.
By now it should be obvious to everyone but the most ardent Obamaton how damaging the ascension of this empty suited, anti-American racist bigot has been.
There are few areas of America today, either domestically or in the foreign arena, where this total clown of a leftist puppet has not damaged this Nation for untold numbers of generations in our future.
I, for one, will never forget the truest thing ever uttered by any candidate in any election anywhere:
So now, we here locally are matched with the same threat.
Jamie Herrera is, unfortunately, my state representative.
She has proven there is no lie she won't tell; no exaggeration she won't engage in; no person she won't use to get elected.
This woman hadn't even lived in the district for the ten years before a corrupt appointment process gave her the job. During that process, she lied to the commissioners and she lied to us, but no matter; the fix was in from the beginning.
She had not owned a or operated a business, had a private sector job, didn't own any property and, in fact, the only tie she had to this district was an absentee voter registration.
She lied about being responsible for raising millions of dollars for Bush, lied about her position with McMorris (Notice how she always refers to herself as a "senior legislative aide?" A quick check shows that Herrera wasn't EVER a "senior legislative aide" working for McMorris. Why wold she lie?) and lied again when she likened her extensive absence from this district as being the "same thing as being in the military."
Having served, I can categorically state that pouring coffee for McMorris and being a career intern is NOTHING like "being in the military" and it's an outright insult to the millions of us who HAVE served in this Nation's defense.
Now, these observations set the table for the comparison between OUR empty suit: Jamie Herrera, and the empty suit currently, to our everlasting dismay, occupying the White House.
Did either Herrera or Obama serve in the Armed Forces?
No.
Did either Herrera or Obama ever work in the private sector or own a business?
No.
Did either Herrera or Obama have any legislative experience that remotely prepared them for election to the office they seek?
No.
Did both Herrera and Obama lie through their teeth to get elected?
Yes.
Do both Herrera and Obama support organized labor?
Yes.
Do both Herrera and Obama support SEIU?
Yes.
Do either of them have a clue?
No.
There are, no doubt, many other comparisons where these two are the same.
But for me, the question is this: why on earth would we compound our first error of electing an empty suited, anti-American racist bigot by electing another empty suited, absolutely-unprepared-to-be-in-Congress-cheerleader to represent this area as yet another notch in her unearned gunbelt?
Why?
.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query empty suited bigot. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query empty suited bigot. Sort by date Show all posts
Sunday, January 03, 2010
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Haugen lost 3 votes here today.
Look, I admit it: Jaime Herrera is a disaster as a representative in Congress, much like she was in the legislature.
Her pro-bridge/light rail tolls shtick will hurt this area for decades, sucking $100's of millions of dollars out of our local economy in tolls for a bridge replacement, light rail and tolls that we do not want, do not need and cannot afford. There is no way I would ever vote for her for anything except, perhaps a "guilty" verdict.
So, along comes Jon Haugen, democrat (this time) the only one with the guts to take Babs on. His positions on the CRC scam are music to a conservatives ears. I was going to vote for him, as was my wife and kids.
The operative word being "was."
And then, today, I find out he's got a screw loose.
In an email unsolicited exchange between Haugen and Retired Navy Commander Larry Patella (Haugen, too, is a retired Navy Commander) he lifted the mask and showed a true, genuine, whack job:
That said, one may have the opinion that Obama is a muslim without being a bigot in any way. One can have the opinion that Obama and his policies have been a disaster that will take generations to recover from without care or concern over Obama's half-white heritage... and one can feel free to oppose him entirely for political and philosophical reasons, much like I've opposed democrat morons of the past like the previous worst president in the history of this country,. the lily-white Jimmy Carter.
But one can't do and keep MY vote is attempt to brand someone and label someone for an opinion that wasn't apparently, expressed directly to Haugen but instead, through a newspaper (I can't find the article in question) as if the First Amendment was the First Suggestion.
If opposition to the sheer, unadulterated idiocy of that empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot occupying the White House just nowmakes me a "bigot", then I guess I'll have to live with it. But in this instance, that opposition is not because of the color of the source of that idiocy but because of the idiocy and incompetence itself.
That Haugen is so twisted that he either doesn't know or cannot differentiate the difference disqualifies him for consideration for election to anything... including dog catcher.
Her pro-bridge/light rail tolls shtick will hurt this area for decades, sucking $100's of millions of dollars out of our local economy in tolls for a bridge replacement, light rail and tolls that we do not want, do not need and cannot afford. There is no way I would ever vote for her for anything except, perhaps a "guilty" verdict.
So, along comes Jon Haugen, democrat (this time) the only one with the guts to take Babs on. His positions on the CRC scam are music to a conservatives ears. I was going to vote for him, as was my wife and kids.
The operative word being "was."
And then, today, I find out he's got a screw loose.
In an email unsolicited exchange between Haugen and Retired Navy Commander Larry Patella (Haugen, too, is a retired Navy Commander) he lifted the mask and showed a true, genuine, whack job:
From: Jon Haugen [mailto:jthaugen@yahoo.com]As a former commissioner Army officer, I am embarrassed that this kind of political bigotry can be expressed by some one who makes such a big deal, not only about his service but the service of others not even running.
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 8:33 PM
To: Local Mailing List
Cc: WA-03 N David Madore; WA-03 V MOAA BETH BROWN; Clark CC Tom Mielke; WA-03 N Columbian Stevie Mathieu; MOAA Shoemaker; JT Haugen; judgejohnwulle@comcast.net
Subject: WA-03 Larry Patella, bigot
Sunday, 22 July 2012
Hi Larry,
I know you are bigoted toward our President probably because his skin color is not white. You had a letter published in The Reflector claiming Barack Obama was a Muslim when you knew he was not, you lied.
I do not know you well but I have not attended local Military Officers Association of America (MOAA) because of your association with that group.
I hate to say that a fellow retired Navy Commander is a bigot but you have proven your self to be a bigot.
Please remove my name from your mailing list. I do not wish to be associated with you.
Jon Haugen
Commander, Naval Reserve, Retired.
That said, one may have the opinion that Obama is a muslim without being a bigot in any way. One can have the opinion that Obama and his policies have been a disaster that will take generations to recover from without care or concern over Obama's half-white heritage... and one can feel free to oppose him entirely for political and philosophical reasons, much like I've opposed democrat morons of the past like the previous worst president in the history of this country,. the lily-white Jimmy Carter.
But one can't do and keep MY vote is attempt to brand someone and label someone for an opinion that wasn't apparently, expressed directly to Haugen but instead, through a newspaper (I can't find the article in question) as if the First Amendment was the First Suggestion.
If opposition to the sheer, unadulterated idiocy of that empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot occupying the White House just nowmakes me a "bigot", then I guess I'll have to live with it. But in this instance, that opposition is not because of the color of the source of that idiocy but because of the idiocy and incompetence itself.
That Haugen is so twisted that he either doesn't know or cannot differentiate the difference disqualifies him for consideration for election to anything... including dog catcher.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Obama's Keystone-Cop politics.
.
There's an increasingly major element of tragedy that is the comedy in the White House... now that Paterson blames the empty suit for his troubles.
Unforced errors that would make even the newest beginning tennis player blush and hide their heads in shame. An inability to avoid the appearance of incompetence and short-sightedness that is going to cost, if it isn't already costing us, major amounts of spilled blood.
We all know the idiocy that has marked the tenure of the empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot occupying the White House; it would serve no purpose to rehash those elements of a failed presidency here.
So when we look at the stupidity of the White House and Paterson, all we can do is shake our collective heads at the morons running this country and believe we, as a Nation, can actually survive the empty suit's hopefully impeachment-shortened tenure.
The set up? Paterson, something of a major-league adulterer himself, took over for a dumb ass named Eliott Spitzer, who felt the only way he could get laid was to pay for it, in amounts that simply boggle the mind.
The problem is that Paterson has been an abysmal disaster as governor, not unlike most leftists who manage to scam the job.
That he was/is a disaster isn't a particularly difficult problem for the empty suit. The problem is that, unlike our half white president, Governor Paterson is all black... and vision impaired to boot.
Now, any fringe-left scum will tell you that no thinking, sentient being could POSSIBLY disagree with the empty suit's program of turning this country into a Marxist, Socialist Utopia unless they are possessed by the demon racism.
It's an automatic, built in, fall back possession for almost every leftist politician: explain and mute the opposition by running around, screaming, "RACIST!!!!"
It's a crock, of course. But playing the racism card knocks the opposition off message and plays to white guilt.
So... how are we to react to the Empty Suits's interference in New York politics? It's difficult to claim racism under the circumstance. Given the president's half-African, half Caucasian bloodline and Gov. Paterson's black genetic make up, can either party claim "racism?" Can their surrogates, like Obama's Winged Monkeys?
Of course not. Thus the moronic handling of this relatively simple matter again brings to light the rampant stupidity at play here... the frightening incompetence again displayed by the ACORN-in-Chief.
Paterson's insistence on running is a huge help to the GOP. Leftist efforts to clear the field for Cuomo, now exposed as most of their amateurish crap eventually sees the light of day will hurt them with key constituencies and provide the possibilities for major inroads by Giuliani with both minorities and a frequently overlooked group that can still vote in large numbers: those challenged with physical issues can be exploited for purposes of charging, this time accurately, discrimination by those who would sweep Paterson out of the way in the interests of political expediency.
And if those running this show weren't complete idiots, they'd already know that, and this whole sorry episode could have been avoided.
.
There's an increasingly major element of tragedy that is the comedy in the White House... now that Paterson blames the empty suit for his troubles.
Unforced errors that would make even the newest beginning tennis player blush and hide their heads in shame. An inability to avoid the appearance of incompetence and short-sightedness that is going to cost, if it isn't already costing us, major amounts of spilled blood.
We all know the idiocy that has marked the tenure of the empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot occupying the White House; it would serve no purpose to rehash those elements of a failed presidency here.
So when we look at the stupidity of the White House and Paterson, all we can do is shake our collective heads at the morons running this country and believe we, as a Nation, can actually survive the empty suit's hopefully impeachment-shortened tenure.
The set up? Paterson, something of a major-league adulterer himself, took over for a dumb ass named Eliott Spitzer, who felt the only way he could get laid was to pay for it, in amounts that simply boggle the mind.
The problem is that Paterson has been an abysmal disaster as governor, not unlike most leftists who manage to scam the job.
That he was/is a disaster isn't a particularly difficult problem for the empty suit. The problem is that, unlike our half white president, Governor Paterson is all black... and vision impaired to boot.
Now, any fringe-left scum will tell you that no thinking, sentient being could POSSIBLY disagree with the empty suit's program of turning this country into a Marxist, Socialist Utopia unless they are possessed by the demon racism.
It's an automatic, built in, fall back possession for almost every leftist politician: explain and mute the opposition by running around, screaming, "RACIST!!!!"
It's a crock, of course. But playing the racism card knocks the opposition off message and plays to white guilt.
So... how are we to react to the Empty Suits's interference in New York politics? It's difficult to claim racism under the circumstance. Given the president's half-African, half Caucasian bloodline and Gov. Paterson's black genetic make up, can either party claim "racism?" Can their surrogates, like Obama's Winged Monkeys?
Of course not. Thus the moronic handling of this relatively simple matter again brings to light the rampant stupidity at play here... the frightening incompetence again displayed by the ACORN-in-Chief.
Paterson's insistence on running is a huge help to the GOP. Leftist efforts to clear the field for Cuomo, now exposed as most of their amateurish crap eventually sees the light of day will hurt them with key constituencies and provide the possibilities for major inroads by Giuliani with both minorities and a frequently overlooked group that can still vote in large numbers: those challenged with physical issues can be exploited for purposes of charging, this time accurately, discrimination by those who would sweep Paterson out of the way in the interests of political expediency.
And if those running this show weren't complete idiots, they'd already know that, and this whole sorry episode could have been avoided.
.
Friday, September 25, 2009
Gee... having a clueless moron in the White House makes me feel GREAT about now: Iran building SECOND nuke plant.
.
A small poster has been making the rounds on the net over the last few days. It shows George Bush in a rather humorous pose and the title under the picture is "Miss me yet?"
I'm not exactly sure. But if the question were asked a different way, something like: Given the latest news concerning Iran's drive to get a nuke, would you rather have George Bush or Barack Obama at the helm? that answer is easy.
And it ain't the empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot, either.
We have an unpleasant task in front of us. The question here is this: does the ball-less moron that's president get it? Does he have what it takes to do what needs to be done?
No.
I'm not 100% sure that Bush would have what it takes, either. But I think he would be much more LIKELY to have it.
First, Obama and the Russians are too stupid to figure out that WE are number one of their target list... not Israel.
I'm pretty sure that Obama's lack of depth and his built-in anti-semtism, as repeatedly illustrated by his nazi preacher, would oh-so-secretly thrill the empty suit if Israel were the target... and if Iran's chief nutberger actually would blow Israel away.
The trouble with that, however, is Whackjob isn't all that keen on creating 2 to 4 million martyrs at one time.... martyrs that would be laid at his feet. His strategic problem is that he, Whackjob, cannot pop a nuke in Israel without killing hundreds of thousands of Arabs.
But killing millions of Americans? Killing millions of Russians? Why, that's a whole different kettle of fish.
What to do.... what to do.
The scumbag running Iran is fully capable of killing millions.... of us. He's shown his nazi-like tendencies when it came to murdering his own people in cold blood while they were protesting... mostly to the amazingly deafening silence of that idiot in the White House. A dictator capable of slaughtering his own would feel no compunction in slaughtering anyone else.
One wonders: has the thought occurred to the fringe-leftists infesting the White House that all of Whackjob's bluster about Israel is a feint? Is this scumbag's hatred, aimed at Israel, designed in it's entirety, to make his actions "acceptable" to the empty suited idiot running the show in DC?
Question One: Will that idiot we call "President" do anything that will make any difference?
Question Two: Does he fully understand the threat?
Question Three: Does he know what needs to be done?
Question Four: Will he do it?
No.
No.
No and,
no.
The ACORN in chief has spent all of his time paying those who got him elected off, and wasted considerable time on health care reform that is going no where.
During the entirety of the campaign, and years before, the left whined and sniveled about how tough our military was having it. They cried, and bitched about how long and how many tours our ALL VOLUNTEER FORCE had to spend in Iraq.
OK... the leftist scum took power in 06. Their moron became president 9 months ago.
What have they done to fix this?
Nothing.
So now, we're faced with an inability to immediately respond with the force we need for our own security.
Yeah, the leftists ALL knew how to do it SO much better.
Except they didn't.
Unfortunately, we have little ability to put boots on the ground. Further, at this point, we lack the guts/will on the part of the simple-minded idiot running the show. Because of leftist game playing, where NOTHING was done to address this scenario, we only have one choice: Does this country become fully committed to end the threat of Iranian nukes?
Or do we, as I suspect the Coward-in-Chief ultimately will, just accept it as a fate-accompli?
That is the temporary, short-lived solution. That is, putting off the ultimate problem will keep us comfortable for a little while longer.
But then what?
If we fail to act... THEN what?
The now-acknowledged presence of this SECOND (the first was bad enough) nuclear facility DEMANDS action.
FAILURE to act sends a message... just like making the tough decision sends a message.
We must mobilize the entirety of the Armed Forces of the United States.
We must immediately re-implement the draft, to include women.
We must NOT count on our "allies" to help us; we must be prepared to go it alone.
We must NOT allow Russia or China to threaten us out of doing what must be done.
Yes, I know. It will take away some of the comfort that we've experienced for the past 8 years; when we SHOULD have mobilized as a society and a country to defeat the threat; had we done so back then, we wouldn't be facing an Iranian nuclear threat NOW.
But the time to act is NOW.
And our failure to act NOW will cause rivers of American blood to flow later. Not much later... but later.
So the leftist idiots can bury their heads farther and deeper into the sand... so that when these scum get around to hurting us.... they will hurt us really, really, bad.
.
A small poster has been making the rounds on the net over the last few days. It shows George Bush in a rather humorous pose and the title under the picture is "Miss me yet?"
I'm not exactly sure. But if the question were asked a different way, something like: Given the latest news concerning Iran's drive to get a nuke, would you rather have George Bush or Barack Obama at the helm? that answer is easy.
And it ain't the empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot, either.
We have an unpleasant task in front of us. The question here is this: does the ball-less moron that's president get it? Does he have what it takes to do what needs to be done?
No.
I'm not 100% sure that Bush would have what it takes, either. But I think he would be much more LIKELY to have it.
First, Obama and the Russians are too stupid to figure out that WE are number one of their target list... not Israel.
I'm pretty sure that Obama's lack of depth and his built-in anti-semtism, as repeatedly illustrated by his nazi preacher, would oh-so-secretly thrill the empty suit if Israel were the target... and if Iran's chief nutberger actually would blow Israel away.
The trouble with that, however, is Whackjob isn't all that keen on creating 2 to 4 million martyrs at one time.... martyrs that would be laid at his feet. His strategic problem is that he, Whackjob, cannot pop a nuke in Israel without killing hundreds of thousands of Arabs.
But killing millions of Americans? Killing millions of Russians? Why, that's a whole different kettle of fish.
What to do.... what to do.
The scumbag running Iran is fully capable of killing millions.... of us. He's shown his nazi-like tendencies when it came to murdering his own people in cold blood while they were protesting... mostly to the amazingly deafening silence of that idiot in the White House. A dictator capable of slaughtering his own would feel no compunction in slaughtering anyone else.
One wonders: has the thought occurred to the fringe-leftists infesting the White House that all of Whackjob's bluster about Israel is a feint? Is this scumbag's hatred, aimed at Israel, designed in it's entirety, to make his actions "acceptable" to the empty suited idiot running the show in DC?
Question One: Will that idiot we call "President" do anything that will make any difference?
Question Two: Does he fully understand the threat?
Question Three: Does he know what needs to be done?
Question Four: Will he do it?
No.
No.
No and,
no.
The ACORN in chief has spent all of his time paying those who got him elected off, and wasted considerable time on health care reform that is going no where.
During the entirety of the campaign, and years before, the left whined and sniveled about how tough our military was having it. They cried, and bitched about how long and how many tours our ALL VOLUNTEER FORCE had to spend in Iraq.
OK... the leftist scum took power in 06. Their moron became president 9 months ago.
What have they done to fix this?
Nothing.
So now, we're faced with an inability to immediately respond with the force we need for our own security.
Yeah, the leftists ALL knew how to do it SO much better.
Except they didn't.
Unfortunately, we have little ability to put boots on the ground. Further, at this point, we lack the guts/will on the part of the simple-minded idiot running the show. Because of leftist game playing, where NOTHING was done to address this scenario, we only have one choice: Does this country become fully committed to end the threat of Iranian nukes?
Or do we, as I suspect the Coward-in-Chief ultimately will, just accept it as a fate-accompli?
That is the temporary, short-lived solution. That is, putting off the ultimate problem will keep us comfortable for a little while longer.
But then what?
If we fail to act... THEN what?
The now-acknowledged presence of this SECOND (the first was bad enough) nuclear facility DEMANDS action.
FAILURE to act sends a message... just like making the tough decision sends a message.
We must mobilize the entirety of the Armed Forces of the United States.
We must immediately re-implement the draft, to include women.
We must NOT count on our "allies" to help us; we must be prepared to go it alone.
We must NOT allow Russia or China to threaten us out of doing what must be done.
Yes, I know. It will take away some of the comfort that we've experienced for the past 8 years; when we SHOULD have mobilized as a society and a country to defeat the threat; had we done so back then, we wouldn't be facing an Iranian nuclear threat NOW.
But the time to act is NOW.
And our failure to act NOW will cause rivers of American blood to flow later. Not much later... but later.
So the leftist idiots can bury their heads farther and deeper into the sand... so that when these scum get around to hurting us.... they will hurt us really, really, bad.
.
Saturday, September 05, 2009
Van Jones: racist bigot in the White House - Here's a few thousand well-chosen words this scumbag is tied up with
.
There is no question that the American people voted in this utterly clueless, anti-American racist bigot into the White House, so it's not surprising that that this scumbag would surround himself with like-thinking scumbags.
Van Jones is all that. A self-professed communist, Jones has no more business having a position in our government then he does engaging neuro-surgery.
The more time goes on the more the American people are doing the job that incompetent idiot in the White House SHOULD have done before hiring this waste of skin for ANY position, ANYWHERE.
Each minute seems to bring out yet another revelation about what an amoral, fringe-left, dangerous individual Jones is. And here's the latest, courtesy of Big Hollywood:
So, the question is this: What did our empty-suit know, and when did he know it?
There are, really, only two possibilities here:
In his incompetent haste to hire someone reflective of his political and social positions, Obama hired this clown KNOWING that he held these positions and beliefs, positions and beliefs that so closely mirror that of the messiah himself;
OR, his incompetence precluded a thorough vetting process and this scumbag slipped through the cracks.
Either way, this sorry episode amounts to yet another in the now seemingly endless series of reasons why that empty-suited, Anti-American racist bigot occupying the White House should no more be president then their lied-about-getting-from-the-dog-pound dog.
Makes me all warm and fuzzy inside to see what a firm grasp the incompetent leading us has on his own people. Much like the firm grasp he has on health care, foreign policy, domestic policy and military leadership.
In short... no grasp at all.
.
There is no question that the American people voted in this utterly clueless, anti-American racist bigot into the White House, so it's not surprising that that this scumbag would surround himself with like-thinking scumbags.
Van Jones is all that. A self-professed communist, Jones has no more business having a position in our government then he does engaging neuro-surgery.
The more time goes on the more the American people are doing the job that incompetent idiot in the White House SHOULD have done before hiring this waste of skin for ANY position, ANYWHERE.
Each minute seems to bring out yet another revelation about what an amoral, fringe-left, dangerous individual Jones is. And here's the latest, courtesy of Big Hollywood:
So, the question is this: What did our empty-suit know, and when did he know it?
There are, really, only two possibilities here:
In his incompetent haste to hire someone reflective of his political and social positions, Obama hired this clown KNOWING that he held these positions and beliefs, positions and beliefs that so closely mirror that of the messiah himself;
OR, his incompetence precluded a thorough vetting process and this scumbag slipped through the cracks.
Either way, this sorry episode amounts to yet another in the now seemingly endless series of reasons why that empty-suited, Anti-American racist bigot occupying the White House should no more be president then their lied-about-getting-from-the-dog-pound dog.
Makes me all warm and fuzzy inside to see what a firm grasp the incompetent leading us has on his own people. Much like the firm grasp he has on health care, foreign policy, domestic policy and military leadership.
In short... no grasp at all.
.
Monday, October 11, 2010
Who I'm voting against in the general and votes on initiatives and referenda.
The short list.
Murray and Rossi
I don't believe either one should be in the Senate. I believe that Rossi has run a terrible campaign; that he started way too late and will ultimately lose and I have no intention of rewarding arrogance with my vote.
I believe that Murray is as dumb as a plank, has wrongly scammed veterans into think she gives a damn about us, has helped the empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot in the White House spend us into oblivion.
I will write in someone here.
Herrera
My cocker spaniel has spent more time in this district over the past 13 years (and he's a puppy) and with Herrera having everything handed to her on a silver platter, from the conspiracy that gave her the appointment to the state house where she did absolutely nothing besides co-sponsor and support SEIU legislation while selling us out to the left by emptying the last of our state emergency fund to help them spend our money to the despicable campaign ran by those who own Herrera, she has proven herself to be the worst we have to offer, and not the best. I will not reward an empty-suited puppet with my vote.
I will likely write in either my dog's name or Chris Boyd... though I'm leaning to the symbolism of my dog over the obvious substance and integrity of Boyd.
Probst and Stonier (If I were in the 17th)
Probst, while claiming to be a fiscal conservative, is unfortunately for him, a vote for the fringe-leftist whack jobs that run the House who helped jack our taxes up some $800 million during the last session... and that matters a great deal more than his individual positions.
Stonier was an Obama delegate at the National Fringe Nutter Convention. She supports the income tax and every other leftist item on the agenda if she supported a whack job like Obama. As a result, she's unfit for elective office and she would also join with Probst in returning the fringe left, screw the people tax and spenders to House leadership if she were elected.
Moeller and Jacks (If I were in the 49th)
Moeller is as far left as we can possibly imagine. HE IS PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CANDY TAX... a fact that local rag wants to keep from you. There is no tax or fee increase he does not support, and would do all he could to expand funding his various leftist causes. Both he and Jacks also support the unnecessary, unneeded and hugely expensive loot rail project. Both support the state income tax. Both oppose privatization. Both are wrong on all of the initiatives.
Jacks does not APPEAR to be as far to the fringe... but the one measure that matters is his voting record: and it mirrors that of Moeller, where in hundreds of votes, he seems to have only disagreed with Moeller on 4 votes. Four. That makes Jacks as much a fringer as Moeller.
Electing either also amounts to yet another vote for the fringe leftist, Seattle-centric leadership that has spent us into another multi-billion dollar deficit. Neither should be elected.
Kampe
Kampe supports the bridge and tolling. He supports all of Moeller's positions. He is a mirror on the initiatives of the democrats in the 49th.
He dresses himself up as some sort of fiscal conservative, but no fiscal conservative could support a multi-billion dollar increase in revenue to the state like Kampe does. He should not be elected.
Stuart
Stuart is the most obviously corrupt politician locally. He supports the I-5 loot rail project, has no problem stuffing tolls he won't have to pay down our throats on BOTH bridges; he opposes a county-wide advisory vote (as does fake Republican Marc Boldt) has the wrong positions (leftist) on the initiatives and is only in office because David Barnett bought him outright when he ran against Tom Mielke 5 years ago.
He's unfit for any elective office.
Seekins
Seekins, a leftist democrat, only ran because Linda is too sick. Until now, she's never bothered to vote in her entire life... and she's now 53. Is the rag going to do or say or write about this?
Seekins disrespects the process even more than Tim "The Liar" Leavitt, who also frequently blew off voting. Neither are fit for elective office, but Seekins in particular should withdraw from the ballot for that stupidity alone.
And Democratian... we're waiting for the story. (Finally done.)
Lew Waters has the details.
Lasher
Is a democrat who has had the job for two thousand years. It's time for him to go, period.
Parker
Parker is a union thug's wife who has benefited directly from that connection. Her insistence on again arrogantly ignoring the sign laws, even after being warned by the state shows she's unfit for office. Combine that with her party (democrat) and she's toast.
Golik
Golik is a union thugs, and his support comes from union thugs and bail bond companies who want an in. I'm not impressed with either his positions or those of the rag who nonsensically tell us that he needs to be elected because he's a prosecutor now.
Bull. He's always been about the Benjamins, and electing someone who will immediately sell out to his union buds to pay them back, while failing to explain why criminal prosecutions are off 30% tend to show he's also unfit for office. Combine that with his election use of the Storro case... and, well, he shouldn't be elected crossing guard.
Initiatives
.
Murray and Rossi
I don't believe either one should be in the Senate. I believe that Rossi has run a terrible campaign; that he started way too late and will ultimately lose and I have no intention of rewarding arrogance with my vote.
I believe that Murray is as dumb as a plank, has wrongly scammed veterans into think she gives a damn about us, has helped the empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot in the White House spend us into oblivion.
I will write in someone here.
Herrera
My cocker spaniel has spent more time in this district over the past 13 years (and he's a puppy) and with Herrera having everything handed to her on a silver platter, from the conspiracy that gave her the appointment to the state house where she did absolutely nothing besides co-sponsor and support SEIU legislation while selling us out to the left by emptying the last of our state emergency fund to help them spend our money to the despicable campaign ran by those who own Herrera, she has proven herself to be the worst we have to offer, and not the best. I will not reward an empty-suited puppet with my vote.
I will likely write in either my dog's name or Chris Boyd... though I'm leaning to the symbolism of my dog over the obvious substance and integrity of Boyd.
Probst and Stonier (If I were in the 17th)
Probst, while claiming to be a fiscal conservative, is unfortunately for him, a vote for the fringe-leftist whack jobs that run the House who helped jack our taxes up some $800 million during the last session... and that matters a great deal more than his individual positions.
Stonier was an Obama delegate at the National Fringe Nutter Convention. She supports the income tax and every other leftist item on the agenda if she supported a whack job like Obama. As a result, she's unfit for elective office and she would also join with Probst in returning the fringe left, screw the people tax and spenders to House leadership if she were elected.
Moeller and Jacks (If I were in the 49th)
Moeller is as far left as we can possibly imagine. HE IS PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CANDY TAX... a fact that local rag wants to keep from you. There is no tax or fee increase he does not support, and would do all he could to expand funding his various leftist causes. Both he and Jacks also support the unnecessary, unneeded and hugely expensive loot rail project. Both support the state income tax. Both oppose privatization. Both are wrong on all of the initiatives.
Jacks does not APPEAR to be as far to the fringe... but the one measure that matters is his voting record: and it mirrors that of Moeller, where in hundreds of votes, he seems to have only disagreed with Moeller on 4 votes. Four. That makes Jacks as much a fringer as Moeller.
Electing either also amounts to yet another vote for the fringe leftist, Seattle-centric leadership that has spent us into another multi-billion dollar deficit. Neither should be elected.
Kampe
Kampe supports the bridge and tolling. He supports all of Moeller's positions. He is a mirror on the initiatives of the democrats in the 49th.
He dresses himself up as some sort of fiscal conservative, but no fiscal conservative could support a multi-billion dollar increase in revenue to the state like Kampe does. He should not be elected.
Stuart
Stuart is the most obviously corrupt politician locally. He supports the I-5 loot rail project, has no problem stuffing tolls he won't have to pay down our throats on BOTH bridges; he opposes a county-wide advisory vote (as does fake Republican Marc Boldt) has the wrong positions (leftist) on the initiatives and is only in office because David Barnett bought him outright when he ran against Tom Mielke 5 years ago.
He's unfit for any elective office.
Seekins
Seekins, a leftist democrat, only ran because Linda is too sick. Until now, she's never bothered to vote in her entire life... and she's now 53. Is the rag going to do or say or write about this?
Seekins disrespects the process even more than Tim "The Liar" Leavitt, who also frequently blew off voting. Neither are fit for elective office, but Seekins in particular should withdraw from the ballot for that stupidity alone.
And Democratian... we're waiting for the story. (Finally done.)
Lew Waters has the details.
Lasher
Is a democrat who has had the job for two thousand years. It's time for him to go, period.
Parker
Parker is a union thug's wife who has benefited directly from that connection. Her insistence on again arrogantly ignoring the sign laws, even after being warned by the state shows she's unfit for office. Combine that with her party (democrat) and she's toast.
Golik
Golik is a union thugs, and his support comes from union thugs and bail bond companies who want an in. I'm not impressed with either his positions or those of the rag who nonsensically tell us that he needs to be elected because he's a prosecutor now.
Bull. He's always been about the Benjamins, and electing someone who will immediately sell out to his union buds to pay them back, while failing to explain why criminal prosecutions are off 30% tend to show he's also unfit for office. Combine that with his election use of the Storro case... and, well, he shouldn't be elected crossing guard.
Initiatives
.
This is a yes.
.
.
This is a yes.
.
.
This is an obvious and absolute "no."
.
.
This is a yes.
.
.
This is a no.
.
.
This is a yes.
.
.
This is a no.
.
.
I'm a "no" on this.
.
.
Vote "yes."
.
There you have it. Ain't democracy grand?.
Tuesday, December 03, 2013
"You mad, bro?" Nate Silver weighs in: Democrats face massacre in US Senate races, possibly down 12 senators.
As folks are finally getting past the hype (Clearly, the American voter can be quite gullible) and finally figuring out that the president is an empty-suited idiot and his party is bent on the destruction of this country.
Well, the trend is building, and congressionally, 2014 is trending towards a replay of 20 years ago, when the GOP swept the leftists out of office across the land in what amounts to a "reset" of government.
I'm not wild about the PROBABILITY of this outcome, because given GOP ineptitude at most levels, I have no real faith that they won't find a way to screw it up somehow, much like they screwed up 2012.
But the empty-suited, anti_American bigot's incompetence seems to finally be grating on the American people, save the color-blinded black voter, who has been trained to only think in terms of race when they vote (and when things like affirmative action don't go their way): and who will continue to slavishly support that simple idiot in the White House ENTIRELY because of his color, since he has done more TO the black population since his ascension to the throne than Jim Crow.
Link to auto-start video:
http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?freewheel=90085&sitesection=breitbart_nws_pol_sty_vmppap&VID=25402592
Starting with the generic ballot that simply pits Republican lawmakers against their Democrat counterparts, the movement towards the GOP has been striking. In the Real Clear Politics average of these polls, going back as far as the beginning of the year, Democrats have consistently led by 3 to 4 points. During the government shutdown, Democrats leaped to 6 and 7 point leads. Since the disastrous rollout of ObamaCare, though, Republicans are not only in the lead by 2.5 points, they have led in every poll but one since November 10.
This generic polling is reflected in the available polling of individual Senate seats.
Keep in mind that in order to win control of the Senate, Republicans need only pick up 6 seats, and with Democrat incumbents retiring in the redder than red states of South Dakota, West Virginia, and Montana, Republicans pretty much have three Senate pick-ups in the bag. But thanks to ObamaCare and vulnerable Democrat Senators refusing to put their own promises and the well being of their constituents above slavish devotion to Obama, picking off another three should be fairly easy.
More:
Well, the trend is building, and congressionally, 2014 is trending towards a replay of 20 years ago, when the GOP swept the leftists out of office across the land in what amounts to a "reset" of government.
I'm not wild about the PROBABILITY of this outcome, because given GOP ineptitude at most levels, I have no real faith that they won't find a way to screw it up somehow, much like they screwed up 2012.
But the empty-suited, anti_American bigot's incompetence seems to finally be grating on the American people, save the color-blinded black voter, who has been trained to only think in terms of race when they vote (and when things like affirmative action don't go their way): and who will continue to slavishly support that simple idiot in the White House ENTIRELY because of his color, since he has done more TO the black population since his ascension to the throne than Jim Crow.
Polls Show ObamaCare Wave Building Against Senate Democrats
Link to auto-start video:
http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?freewheel=90085&sitesection=breitbart_nws_pol_sty_vmppap&VID=25402592
Recent polling shows that an election wave of anti-ObamaCare sentiment is growing, and it is not only likely to hand the GOP control of the United States Senate, but might wipe out as many as 12 Democrat seats--many of which looked safe just a few months ago.
Back in July, Five Thirty Eight's election guru Nate Silver believed that control of the Senate was a tossup. That has all changed now that voters got their first real look at the brutal consequences of ObamaCare.Starting with the generic ballot that simply pits Republican lawmakers against their Democrat counterparts, the movement towards the GOP has been striking. In the Real Clear Politics average of these polls, going back as far as the beginning of the year, Democrats have consistently led by 3 to 4 points. During the government shutdown, Democrats leaped to 6 and 7 point leads. Since the disastrous rollout of ObamaCare, though, Republicans are not only in the lead by 2.5 points, they have led in every poll but one since November 10.
This generic polling is reflected in the available polling of individual Senate seats.
Keep in mind that in order to win control of the Senate, Republicans need only pick up 6 seats, and with Democrat incumbents retiring in the redder than red states of South Dakota, West Virginia, and Montana, Republicans pretty much have three Senate pick-ups in the bag. But thanks to ObamaCare and vulnerable Democrat Senators refusing to put their own promises and the well being of their constituents above slavish devotion to Obama, picking off another three should be fairly easy.
More:
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Do we have MORE rights now than we did in 2009 when Obama was inaugurated...
....or fewer?
The 2nd Amendment says:
I hear morons like Kithaber in Oregon question why we, as civilians, NEED "assault rifles." Or another idiot in Oregon (there are so very many) a senator by the name of Burdick, ask
This isn't ABOUT hunting.
This isn't ABOUT target shooting.
This IS about defending ourselves from government tyranny... the kind Kitzhaber, who lies when he says he supports the 2nd Amendment, and Burdick, appear to want to ram down our throats.
If Burdick's idiotic "reasoning" is taken to it's logical 3end, that is, the big magazines can "harm our neighbors" then her NEXT act will be to confiscate our guns.
Because when it COMES to guns, it only takes ONE bullet to do that, you empty-suited idiot.
So, the only step left is to remove the MEANS to FIRE a bullet.
When our government gets stupid like this, it makes those of us who Obama said so famously want to "cling to our guns," do so even more.
And here's the deal: My government can't have mine.
Not now. Not ever.
Which brings us back to the original question: do we have more right's on the empty suited, anti-American racist bigot in the White House's watch?
Or fewer?
The 2nd Amendment says:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.The STATE Constitution says: (Article 10, Section 1)
Text of Section 1: Who Liable To Military Duty.
All able-bodied male citizens of this state between the ages of eighteen (18) and forty-five (45) years except such as are exempt by laws of the United States or by the laws of this state, shall be liable to military duty.In a few hours, Obama will again expand his power by bypassing Congress and implementing laws that "infringe" our rights concerning our guns.
I hear morons like Kithaber in Oregon question why we, as civilians, NEED "assault rifles." Or another idiot in Oregon (there are so very many) a senator by the name of Burdick, ask
"Even hunters are restricted from using large capacity magazines: there is a five cartridge limit for large game hunting, and three for bird hunting," wrote the Portland Democrat, a longtime advocate of gun control. "If we limit capacity for hunting animals, why do we not extend that principle to guns that may harm our neighbors?"Because, you morons: why I have assault rifles or 10,000 round magazines if I feel like it is none of your fricking business.
This isn't ABOUT hunting.
This isn't ABOUT target shooting.
This IS about defending ourselves from government tyranny... the kind Kitzhaber, who lies when he says he supports the 2nd Amendment, and Burdick, appear to want to ram down our throats.
If Burdick's idiotic "reasoning" is taken to it's logical 3end, that is, the big magazines can "harm our neighbors" then her NEXT act will be to confiscate our guns.
Because when it COMES to guns, it only takes ONE bullet to do that, you empty-suited idiot.
So, the only step left is to remove the MEANS to FIRE a bullet.
When our government gets stupid like this, it makes those of us who Obama said so famously want to "cling to our guns," do so even more.
And here's the deal: My government can't have mine.
Not now. Not ever.
Which brings us back to the original question: do we have more right's on the empty suited, anti-American racist bigot in the White House's watch?
Or fewer?
Monday, December 28, 2009
So... are you all feeling any safer?
.
Time's up, Mr. President.
I've got to ask you: What's your self-delusion brought us?
Half of the folks you've released from Gitmo are now engaged in terrorist operations against us.
The scumbag who tried to blow up the plane? Clearly an enemy combatant... and yet you treat him like an American who tried to steal some luggage.
YOU continue to operate in a mental vacuum while you stupidly try to get us to actually believe that these actions are just the efforts of a misguided few instead of an extension of millions that want to kill us.
Well, Mr. President... here we are. Your fellow fringe left whack jobs used to snivel that Bush policies didn't make us feel any safer.
You sent your Secretary of Homeland Security out to lie yesterday when that moron told us that "the system worked," when you know damned well it didn't.
For God's sake... will you tell us the truth about SOMETHING.... ANYTHING? Just for the sheer thrill of hearing it?
I don't "feel" safer now, Mr. President. In fact, I don't go anywhere without my .45, thanks in part to your moronic efforts.
Here's a brief reminder, written back in September. Time is up, Mr. President. Iran is some Bad Boys. What you gonna do when they come for us?
Time's up, Mr. President.
I've got to ask you: What's your self-delusion brought us?
Half of the folks you've released from Gitmo are now engaged in terrorist operations against us.
The scumbag who tried to blow up the plane? Clearly an enemy combatant... and yet you treat him like an American who tried to steal some luggage.
YOU continue to operate in a mental vacuum while you stupidly try to get us to actually believe that these actions are just the efforts of a misguided few instead of an extension of millions that want to kill us.
Well, Mr. President... here we are. Your fellow fringe left whack jobs used to snivel that Bush policies didn't make us feel any safer.
You sent your Secretary of Homeland Security out to lie yesterday when that moron told us that "the system worked," when you know damned well it didn't.
For God's sake... will you tell us the truth about SOMETHING.... ANYTHING? Just for the sheer thrill of hearing it?
I don't "feel" safer now, Mr. President. In fact, I don't go anywhere without my .45, thanks in part to your moronic efforts.
Here's a brief reminder, written back in September. Time is up, Mr. President. Iran is some Bad Boys. What you gonna do when they come for us?
Leftists and other Iran supporters are all about a "measured response." They want "sanctions" and other garbage like that to get Iran to behave on the nuclear issue... and, perhaps, others as well.And here's another one for your viewing pleasure:
Can someone.... anyone... tell me when "sanctions" have EVER worked.... ANYWHERE?
What did "sanctions" do to Saddam and his policies? What did "sanctions" do against Japan? What have "sanctions" done against the NorK's?
The reason that Iran is ignoring the rest of the world, particularly now, is because they rightfully believe that the rest of the world lacks the will to DO anything to stop them.
Iran believes that they hold their foot on the oil hose in the middle east. They believe that the rest of the world is powerless and terrified because of the threat of cutting off our oil.
The simple idiot in the White House plays into that perfectly by refusing to open up every possible area in the United States for exploration and drilling. As a result, we've done NOTHING to gain energy independence... and ARE doing nothing to gain that independence... precisely as the Iranians and the rest of the oil producers KNOW we won't.
So... why should Iran behave? Why should they end their military nuclear program, when they know we lack the will, if not the capacity, to FORCE them to do end it?
We have a gutless leader in the White House, incapable of taking the tough stand and equally incapable of making the case to the American people that we ALL need to sacrifice in the name of our security.
He doesn't want to be the bearer of bad news. He doesn't want to be the next George Bush.
And many of us are going to die as a result.
"Sanctions?" Iran treats such threats with the contempt they deserve. The Russians will say anything, but do nothing. The Chinese will foster Iranian intransigence under the "confusion to our enemies" rule... and Americans will continue to die.
Yeah.... sanctions. Sanction the hell out of these people, and watch them laugh out loud at our rank stupidity... while they continue to build their nukes.
A small poster has been making the rounds on the net over the last few days. It shows George Bush in a rather humorous pose and the title under the picture is "Miss me yet?"
I'm not exactly sure. But if the question were asked a different way, something like: Given the latest news concerning Iran's drive to get a nuke, would you rather have George Bush or Barack Obama at the helm? that answer is easy.
And it ain't the empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot, either.
We have an unpleasant task in front of us. The question here is this: does the ball- less moron that's president get it? Does he have what it takes to do what needs to be done?
No.
I'm not 100% sure that Bush would have what it takes, either. But I think he would be much more LIKELY to have it.
First, Obama and the Russians are too stupid to figure out that WE are number one of their target list... not Israel.
I'm pretty sure that Obama's lack of depth and his built-in anti-semtism, as repeatedly illustrated by his nazi preacher, would oh-so-secretly thrill the empty suit if Israel were the target... and if Iran's chief nutberger actually would blow Israel away.
The trouble with that, however, is Whackjob isn't all that keen on creating 2 to 4 million martyrs at one time.... martyrs that would be laid at his feet. His strategic problem is that he, Whackjob, cannot pop a nuke in Israel without killing hundreds of thousands of Arabs.
But killing millions of Americans? Killing millions of Russians? Why, that's a whole different kettle of fish.
What to do.... what to do.
The scumbag running Iran is fully capable of killing millions.... of us. He's shown his nazi-like tendencies when it came to murdering his own people in cold blood while they were protesting... mostly to the amazingly deafening silence of that idiot in the White House. A dictator capable of slaughtering his own would feel no compunction in slaughtering anyone else.
One wonders: has the thought occurred to the fringe-leftists infesting the White House that all of Whackjob's bluster about Israel is a feint? Is this scumbag's hatred, aimed at Israel, designed in it's entirety, to make his actions "acceptable" to the empty suited idiot running the show in DC?
Question One: Will that idiot we call "President" do anything that will make any difference?
Question Two: Does he fully understand the threat?
Question Three: Does he know what needs to be done?
Question Four: Will he do it?
No.
No.
No and,
no.
The ACORN in chief has spent all of his time paying those who got him elected off, and wasted considerable time on health care reform that is going no where.
During the entirety of the campaign, and years before, the left whined and sniveled about how tough our military was having it. They cried, and bitched about how long and how many tours our ALL VOLUNTEER FORCE had to spend in Iraq.
OK... the leftist scum took power in 06. Their moron became president 9 months ago.
What have they done to fix this?
Nothing.
So now, we're faced with an inability to immediately respond with the force we need for our own security.
Yeah, the leftists ALL knew how to do it SO much better.
Except they didn't.
Unfortunately, we have little ability to put boots on the ground. Further, at this point, we lack the guts/will on the part of the simple-minded idiot running the show. Because of leftist game playing, where NOTHING was done to address this scenario, we only have one choice: Does this country become fully committed to end the threat of Iranian nukes?
Or do we, as I suspect the Coward-in-Chief ultimately will, just accept it as a fate-accompli?
That is the temporary, short-lived solution. That is, putting off the ultimate problem will keep us comfortable for a little while longer.
But then what?
If we fail to act... THEN what?
The now-acknowledged presence of this SECOND (the first was bad enough) nuclear facility DEMANDS action.
FAILURE to act sends a message... just like making the tough decision sends a message.
We must mobilize the entirety of the Armed Forces of the United States.
We must immediately re-implement the draft, to include women.
We must NOT count on our "allies" to help us; we must be prepared to go it alone.
We must NOT allow Russia or China to threaten us out of doing what must be done.
Yes, I know. It will take away some of the comfort that we've experienced for the past 8 years; when we SHOULD have mobilized as a society and a country to defeat the threat; had we done so back then, we wouldn't be facing an Iranian nuclear threat NOW.
But the time to act is NOW.
And our failure to act NOW will cause rivers of American blood to flow later. Not much later... but later.
So the leftist idiots can bury their heads farther and deeper into the sand... so that when these scum get around to hurting us.... they will hurt us really, really, bad.
Monday, September 20, 2010
A snapshot of delusion: The Clark County Democrats.
I always enjoy reading the democrat's newsletter... because, well, unlike the GOP with it's focus on infighting and backstabbing, at least they HAVE a newsletter... and a downloadable one at that. You know, like the GOP SHOULD have... but doesn't?
Any who, their newsletter this month is a microcosm of the reasons why democrats nationally are getting their collective butts kicked.
Self delusion is a terrible burden. Democrat Dena Horton, who dumped fellow democrat Royce Pollard to work her hiny off for new democrat Tim "The Liar" Leavitt in the mayor's race where he lied his ass off to win the job, puts her imprimatur on an article of delusion so beyond the
pale... well, it's almost as if Horton doesn't understand that the left is despised across the country and this election will be a democrat bloodbath, with political bodies strewn around at every level.
The newsletter has a function, of course, and that's to hearten the troops. But this edition is an
all out swindle sheet:
You see... this is where the self-delusion aspect starts.THE DEMOCRATClark County Democratic Party Newsletter
Volume 19, Issue 9 Serving Democrats with News and Opinion
September 2010
Let’s win this thing in November
The results of the August 17 primary election should give heart to the grass-roots workers who constitute the Democratic Party of Clark County (and most of the readership of this newsletter.)
Seriously.
"Give heart?" Politically speaking, democrat mass suicide would be a more accurate assessment. And a failure to acknowledge the political reality confronting the left is part and parcel as to why they are in such serious political trouble. That they refuse to admit it?
Why... that's par for the course.
Top to bottom — U.S. Sen. Patty Murray down to the Democratic precinct committee officer who snared 20 votes in a sparse precinct along Fifth Plain Creek — there is great hope for a rousing refutation of the pundits who have been predicting a surge of regression to the politics of fear and continued diminution of the middle class.
Waking up to discover that the fringe left version of hope and change includes bankrupting those of us who can still pay taxes to scumbag government employees can get pay raises and the legislature jacks up our taxes by hundreds of millions of dollars while STILL spending us into a multi-billion dollar deficit is not the trite phrase Heywood uses here: the "politics of fear."
It is the reality.
And it is the reality that Horton and her cohorts have accomplished with absolute power at every level of government, from the top on down.... with Murray being the worst individual offender followed by Gregoire.
The requisite spirit was demonstrated when Murray stopped by Vancouver August 20 on her round of kickoffs and got a rousing reception from a noontime crowd of more than 300 at Hamilton Hall in Vancouver Barracks. Murray deftly accentuated the progressive values she has followed in her three terms while eviscerating the big-biz mantras of the banking and real estate mogul who challenges with his promises to dismantle everything accomplished over the past two years.
More accurately described as a "wake," preaching to the tone-deaf choir accomplishes nothing.
"Accomplished?" Seriously?
Making us the laughing stock of the world? Burying us in a mountain of debt that our kids kids won't see the end of is an accomplishment? Telling the American people to f&^* off while they rammed a horrific health care plan down our throats that we don't want, worked diligently to provide amnesty to illegal aliens, bailed out unions left and right on our dime, and caused this
Nation to teeter on the brink of fiscal catastrophe.
Nation to teeter on the brink of fiscal catastrophe.
And Murray was a huge part of that.
A criminally stupid observation.Denny Heck came out of the primary in strong position to hold the 3rd Congressional District seat being given up by Rep. Brian Baird.
It's a democrat turn out issue... and their turn out sucked.
Heck should fire his entire campaign organization and start over, given how miserable his numbers were generally and the democrat's numbers specifically.
While it's a shame that Ridgefield Barbie came out of the pack to make it into the top two, the fact is that it happened because the GOP put together around 57% of the vote... in a democrat held district. Heck is down 9% in the most recent poll and we're told he's in a "strong position?"
No. He isn't. And to suggest he is?
Self-delusional incompetence.
To be sure, some of the numbers are scary. If the general election tallies replicate the primary, Democrats could lose a couple of legislative seats as well as positions in county government.
The understatement.
When the numbers hold up, every legislator outside the Soviet Socialist Republic of Vancouver in Clark County will have an "R" after their names.
Every elected official in Clark County government save the treasurer will have an "R" after his name.
The rep for Congress will have an R after her name, even if that R is an empty-suited moron who doesn't know if she's been punched or bored.
At the federal level, the more that empty suited, Anti-American racist bigot screws up, the less likely the State Cow will be to win again.
That can only happen if Democrats don’t get out and work but instead allow the election to be bought by the likes of a high-tech plutocrat who hopes to ride a no-toll hobby horse to control of local political decisions.
That's no way to talk about David Nirenberg.
Rep. Tim Probst, seeking a second two-year term in Legislative District 17, explained the situation in a post-primary email to supporters:
“After all that’s happened to the political mood over the last two years, my primary election numbers are exactly the same. In the 2008 primary I received 48.17 percent of the vote. In the 2010 primary I received 48.18 percent of the vote.
“And that is with a heavily contested Republican Congressional primary affecting the turnout numbers, as well. The voters know me well, and the national mood has not dented my numbers.
“The 17th District consistently shows higher Republican numbers in primaries, because fewer Independents and Democrats turn out. With many more Independents and Democrats voting in the general election, I expect an outstanding result this November. In 2008, for example, my general election result was 55.76 percent …”
Proving once again that figures don't lie... but liars figure.
Probst left out the part where he was running against an idiot frequently crucified by the paper in 08.
He left out the part where he out spent his GOP opponent about 3 to 1 before the primary.
And he left out the fact that he's an incumbent.
His email and this article defy reality and serve as the beacon to light the way to the leftist disaster coming in 40 odd short days.
His would-be seatmate, Monica Stonier, takes heart from that gap closure. Her Republican opponent took about 56 percent in the primary. She got 33 percent, with Martin Hash getting better than 11 percent for his eccentric effort. Stonier knows she will have to continue working even harder than she worked before the primary. Stonier, an avowed fringe leftist Obama delegate is toast.
The people don't want communists elected except in the communist 49th.
Most normal people aren't interested in supporting someone who wants to bury his district in billions of debt for loot rail and a bridge we neither want nor need. As the income tax is crushed here locally, supporters, like Kampe, will be crushed with it.In the 18th Legislative District, with six varied conservatives bidding to replace the one who ran for Congress, Democrat Dennis Kampe snagged first place in the top-two primary with 32 percent of the vote. That’s six points better than the Republican he’ll face in November.Kampe, the only democrat, received less then 1/3rd of the vote. The GOP put together almost 2/3rds.
He has no chance, and in more realistic moments, likely would admit it.
County Commissioner Steve Stuart, County Clerk Sherry Parker and County Treasurer Doug Lasher all faced challengers backed by the no-tolls mogul. If the usual pattern of November voting holds, they should all prevail.Yeah. And if frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their butts every time they jumped.
Stuart is a corrupt, bought by the casino, pro-bridge toll democrat; in the wrong party at the wrong time. His buddies are out of money this time, and there's no tribal Knight to come along and launder $100,000 through progressive majority this go-round like he did last time.
Of course, that kind of corruption is perfectly OK with leftists.... right?
Parker, the incumbent, got spanked by her GOP opponent; her insistence on using illegal campaign signs typical of the arrogance of the left and the contempt for the laws of this state.
Democrat Tony Golik, bidding to succeed Prosecutor Art Curtis, got just short of a majority in a three-way race where the former chair of Clark County Republicans placed second with 44 percent.Golik is a union thug supported by the bail bonds people who's managed to forget that his primary job was SUPPOSED to be to lock people up. Wrong party and his union affiliation equals a dandy reason to vote against this fringe leftist... unable to get a majority in the primary, he's likely to lose.
Janet Seekins nailed the top spot over three Republicans with 43 percent of theThe combined GOP vote was 57%. Seekins, who wasn't even endorsed by the fishwrapper for the top two (But who no doubt will be this time around for the general) is toast.
vote to succeed County Assessor Linda Franklin.
So's Shotwell for Sherrif.
In this most recent primary, democrat turnout was the lowest since at least 1930 while GOP turn out was the highest in the history of elections.
The fact is this: a massacre of epic proportions is shaping up for the left, and Clark County is no exception. And that the democrats refuse to acknowledge that?
Well, it's just like the rest of the realities they ignore. And now, they're going to suffer for it accordingly.
Monday, September 13, 2010
I guess I'm not the only one who views Obama as "anti-American."
.
For months now, I've frequently prefaced the word "Obama" with the phrase "Empty suited, anti-American racist bigot."
The empty suit aspect has pretty much been adjudicated; calling him and "empty suit" does a disservice to clothing generally.
His racism and bigotry? Proven by his idiocy that led to the "Beer summit."
His anti-Americanism?
Take a look:
For months now, I've frequently prefaced the word "Obama" with the phrase "Empty suited, anti-American racist bigot."
The empty suit aspect has pretty much been adjudicated; calling him and "empty suit" does a disservice to clothing generally.
His racism and bigotry? Proven by his idiocy that led to the "Beer summit."
His anti-Americanism?
Take a look:
Conservative author Dinesh D’Souza recently published an insightful, much-discussed article in Forbes, “How Obama Thinks.”
Drawing upon Obama’s writings and history, D’Souza concludes that his policy agenda—so at odds with traditional American values and principles—is rooted chiefly in the anti-colonialist intellectual influence of his Kenyan-born father:
What then is Obama’s dream? We don’t have to speculate because the President tells us himself in his autobiography, Dreams from My Father. According to Obama, his dream is his father’s dream. . . .
[T]o his son, the elder Obama represented a great and noble cause, the cause of anticolonialism. . . . Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America . . . .
Obama Sr. was an economist, and in 1965 he published an important article in the East Africa Journal called “Problems Facing Our Socialism.” Obama Sr. . . saw state appropriation of wealth as a necessary means to achieve the anticolonial objective of taking resources away from the foreign looters and restoring them to the people of Africa . . . . As he put it, “We need to eliminate power structures that have been built through excessive accumulation so that not only a few individuals shall control a vast magnitude of resources as is the case now.” The senior Obama proposed that the state confiscate private land and raise taxes with no upper limit. In fact, he insisted that “theoretically there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”
Like father, like son, says D’Souza:
Because we, as a nation, didn't even use a magnifying glass, let alone a microscope to check this clown out before we, as a nation, put him in charge, we've sustained damage that untold generations will suffer for.
Because we did not listen to those like Biden, who's statement that Obama wasn't ready to be president was, for whatever the reason, completely ignored by the GOP and certainly the lamestream press, we have this monumental disaster of a president who is starting to make me long for the days of Jimmy Carter... who, while a complete disaster asd president, was at least funneh while he held the job.
.
Monday, July 27, 2009
The racist who is President of the United States.
.
I've been referring to our president as that empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot since long before he was, quite unfortunately, elected to the highest office on the face of the planet, the Presidency of these United States.
I've been concerned about his paper-thin depth, his complete lack of experience, his utter lack of vision, his undeniable lack of credibility and the complete lack of respect for the man and his policies in the foreign policy arena.
Obama is a bigot. He is inculcated in the victimhood that all races so-called minorities have been brainwashed into believing and using for excuses for their failures for decades. I've known this; anyone watching Obama during the Wright debacle, wherein he sat in the church of a fringe leftist racial bigot that would have put anyone in the Klan to shame (purely for political gain, you understand) has known it, and his miserable, racist handling of the Gates matter, wherein his racist, knee-jerk position was automatically to believe ANOTHER racist black professor, who's unconscionable acts were not caused by his race but by his victim-hood, wherein he lied and claimed to be a victim of the racist actions of a white police officer DOING HIS JOB.
The lowlife occupying the White House called a police officer, DOING HIS JOB, “stupid.” He called him that because he has been programmed to automatically assume the officer is wrong any time any member of the black intelligentsia whines or whimpers the “racism” card.
Mr. President, if anyone here is “stupid,” (Besides those who voted for you and continue to support your moronic, clueless administration) it is YOU.
Your utter cluelessness; your race-based presidency that flies directly in the face of EVERYTHING YOU PROMISED, frightens us.
And it has to stop, before you destroy everything.
.
I've been referring to our president as that empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot since long before he was, quite unfortunately, elected to the highest office on the face of the planet, the Presidency of these United States.
I've been concerned about his paper-thin depth, his complete lack of experience, his utter lack of vision, his undeniable lack of credibility and the complete lack of respect for the man and his policies in the foreign policy arena.
Obama is a bigot. He is inculcated in the victimhood that all races so-called minorities have been brainwashed into believing and using for excuses for their failures for decades. I've known this; anyone watching Obama during the Wright debacle, wherein he sat in the church of a fringe leftist racial bigot that would have put anyone in the Klan to shame (purely for political gain, you understand) has known it, and his miserable, racist handling of the Gates matter, wherein his racist, knee-jerk position was automatically to believe ANOTHER racist black professor, who's unconscionable acts were not caused by his race but by his victim-hood, wherein he lied and claimed to be a victim of the racist actions of a white police officer DOING HIS JOB.
The lowlife occupying the White House called a police officer, DOING HIS JOB, “stupid.” He called him that because he has been programmed to automatically assume the officer is wrong any time any member of the black intelligentsia whines or whimpers the “racism” card.
Mr. President, if anyone here is “stupid,” (Besides those who voted for you and continue to support your moronic, clueless administration) it is YOU.
Your utter cluelessness; your race-based presidency that flies directly in the face of EVERYTHING YOU PROMISED, frightens us.
And it has to stop, before you destroy everything.
.
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Once again, I have to disagree with Don Brunell, President of AWB.
.
Brunell is an interesting guy.
Most recently, he parachuted in to tell US that WE need to get screwed for billions on a project we DON'T need, and DON'T want.
He does represent the Association of Washington Business. But his lies about the bridge project make anything he writes automatically suspect. Reading Brunell talk about government is like reading Goebbels talking about the Greater Reich.
He told us here:
Washington View: There are no easy budget choices for Gregoire, Legislature.
Of course he's wrong. Dead wrong.
Once government recalls who they work FOR, the rest is easy.
Here's the list of cuts:
Eliminate pay raises.
Eliminate step increases.
Reduce budgets and staffing levels back to 2004 levels.
Those who remain after the cuts can always quit, right? I mean, where do they have to go?
And, of course, we can start at the very top. In ONE YEAR (2005), both the governor and lieutenant governor's offices increased THEIR budgets on the order of 37%.
There's nothing "daunting" about it.
Close up The Mansion. Get rid of the vehicles and staff. Move into a 2 bedroom apartment. After all, isn't that what Governor Moonbeam did when he ran that tiny state of California?
Unlike the empty-suited, Anti-American racist bigot in the White House who throws these massive parties EVERY WEEK, put the entirety of government on an austerity budget.
The moron running our government has screwed us for a minimum of $30 billion on the Chrysler/GM bail out... a bail out that shouldn't EVER have happened, but a bail out necessary to pay off his union masters.
So, unlike Mr. Brunell, I say the budget choices really ARE easy:
Remember WHO YOU WORK FOR. And then, reduce pay, benefits and workers enough to fill the gap, while cutting your own budgets at least the 37 percent figure to set the example and lead the way.
Unlike Emperor Empty Suit, who parties and golfs while the rest of us suffer, our government can act. It can stop being about pay offs, and it can START being about fair governance.
And what's so hard about that?
.
Brunell is an interesting guy.
Most recently, he parachuted in to tell US that WE need to get screwed for billions on a project we DON'T need, and DON'T want.
He does represent the Association of Washington Business. But his lies about the bridge project make anything he writes automatically suspect. Reading Brunell talk about government is like reading Goebbels talking about the Greater Reich.
He told us here:
Washington View: There are no easy budget choices for Gregoire, Legislature.
Of course he's wrong. Dead wrong.
Once government recalls who they work FOR, the rest is easy.
Here's the list of cuts:
Eliminate pay raises.
Eliminate step increases.
Reduce budgets and staffing levels back to 2004 levels.
Those who remain after the cuts can always quit, right? I mean, where do they have to go?
And, of course, we can start at the very top. In ONE YEAR (2005), both the governor and lieutenant governor's offices increased THEIR budgets on the order of 37%.
There's nothing "daunting" about it.
Close up The Mansion. Get rid of the vehicles and staff. Move into a 2 bedroom apartment. After all, isn't that what Governor Moonbeam did when he ran that tiny state of California?
Unlike the empty-suited, Anti-American racist bigot in the White House who throws these massive parties EVERY WEEK, put the entirety of government on an austerity budget.
The moron running our government has screwed us for a minimum of $30 billion on the Chrysler/GM bail out... a bail out that shouldn't EVER have happened, but a bail out necessary to pay off his union masters.
So, unlike Mr. Brunell, I say the budget choices really ARE easy:
Remember WHO YOU WORK FOR. And then, reduce pay, benefits and workers enough to fill the gap, while cutting your own budgets at least the 37 percent figure to set the example and lead the way.
Unlike Emperor Empty Suit, who parties and golfs while the rest of us suffer, our government can act. It can stop being about pay offs, and it can START being about fair governance.
And what's so hard about that?
.
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Once again, I have to disagree with Don Brunell, President of AWB.
.
Brunell is an interesting guy.
Most recently, he parachuted in to tell US that WE need to get screwed for billions on a project we DON'T need, and DON'T want.
He does represent the Association of Washington Business. But his lies about the bridge project make anything he writes automatically suspect. Reading Brunell talk about government is like reading Goebbels talking about the Greater Reich.
He told us here:
Washington View: There are no easy budget choices for Gregoire, Legislature.
Of course he's wrong. Dead wrong.
Once government recalls who they work FOR, the rest is easy.
Here's the list of cuts:
Eliminate pay raises.
Eliminate step increases.
Reduce budgets and staffing levels back to 2004 levels.
Those who remain after the cuts can always quit, right? I mean, where do they have to go?
And, of course, we can start at the very top. In ONE YEAR (2005), both the governor and lieutenant governor's offices increased THEIR budgets on the order of 37%.
There's nothing "daunting" about it.
Close up The Mansion. Get rid of the vehicles and staff. Move into a 2 bedroom apartment. After all, isn't that what Governor Moonbeam did when he ran that tiny state of California?
Unlike the empty-suited, Anti-American racist bigot in the White House who throws these massive parties EVERY WEEK, put the entirety of government on an austerity budget.
The moron running our government has screwed us for a minimum of $30 billion on the Chrysler/GM bail out... a bail out that shouldn't EVER have happened, but a bail out necessary to pay off his union masters.
So, unlike Mr. Brunell, I say the budget choices really ARE easy:
Remember WHO YOU WORK FOR. And then, reduce pay, benefits and workers enough to fill the gap, while cutting your own budgets at least the 37 percent figure to set the example and lead the way.
Unlike Emperor Empty Suit, who parties and golfs while the rest of us suffer, our government can act. It can stop being about pay offs, and it can START being about fair governance.
And what's so hard about that?
Brunell is an interesting guy.
Most recently, he parachuted in to tell US that WE need to get screwed for billions on a project we DON'T need, and DON'T want.
He does represent the Association of Washington Business. But his lies about the bridge project make anything he writes automatically suspect. Reading Brunell talk about government is like reading Goebbels talking about the Greater Reich.
He told us here:
Washington View: There are no easy budget choices for Gregoire, Legislature.
Of course he's wrong. Dead wrong.
Once government recalls who they work FOR, the rest is easy.
Here's the list of cuts:
Eliminate pay raises.
Eliminate step increases.
Reduce budgets and staffing levels back to 2004 levels.
Those who remain after the cuts can always quit, right? I mean, where do they have to go?
And, of course, we can start at the very top. In ONE YEAR (2005), both the governor and lieutenant governor's offices increased THEIR budgets on the order of 37%.
There's nothing "daunting" about it.
Close up The Mansion. Get rid of the vehicles and staff. Move into a 2 bedroom apartment. After all, isn't that what Governor Moonbeam did when he ran that tiny state of California?
Unlike the empty-suited, Anti-American racist bigot in the White House who throws these massive parties EVERY WEEK, put the entirety of government on an austerity budget.
The moron running our government has screwed us for a minimum of $30 billion on the Chrysler/GM bail out... a bail out that shouldn't EVER have happened, but a bail out necessary to pay off his union masters.
So, unlike Mr. Brunell, I say the budget choices really ARE easy:
Remember WHO YOU WORK FOR. And then, reduce pay, benefits and workers enough to fill the gap, while cutting your own budgets at least the 37 percent figure to set the example and lead the way.
Unlike Emperor Empty Suit, who parties and golfs while the rest of us suffer, our government can act. It can stop being about pay offs, and it can START being about fair governance.
And what's so hard about that?
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
So, Mike Heywood stopped by.
.
Erstwhile, increasingly perennial candidate Mike Heywood swung by to mention his web site for his campaign:
The problem is that now I have to blow more holes in his positions than a wheel of Swiss cheese.
I've written about Mr. Heywood in the past; those so inclined can search this blog by using the "search" function in the upper left corner.
I'm struck by this phrase on his home page:
If he's not in their pocket... then how come he sounds precisely like they do?
Does he:
Support the massive and unconscionable waste of an unneeded and unwanted I-5 Bridge replacement that has already wasted tens of millions of dollars in planning?
Support the massive and unconscionable waste of an unneeded and unwanted loot rail system?
Support nailing the people with a massive toll every day as they commute to work?
Oppose giving the people of this county a vote?
Support massive annexations so that Vancouver may achieve the utterly worthless position of the second largest city in the state... as if that mattered?
Support the many tax and fee increases the City has rammed down the people's throats?
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes and yes.
Now, tell me... how does that differ from either the downtown mafia or the Columbian?
Will he continue the battle against the Barnett Mafia ramming a massive casino down our throats? He seems to have avoided a position on that.
So, what we have is an avowed leftist (Much like he was when he was running the Columbian's editiorial page... and much like John Laird is now) who wants to continue fighting for every item the downtown mafia and the Columbian want, but somehow Mike is not taking his "... marching orders from The Columbian, and I am not in the pocket of downtown interests."
It is for the reader to decide if the exact similarity between the Downtown Mafia/Columbian positions and those of Mr. Heywood are sheer coincidence.
Oddly, I seem to remember a relatively recent election where the empty suit that we elected never missed the opportunity to compare John McCain with George Bush.
Now, Mike should be aware of that. After all, he seems to exhibit a high level of pride for his support of that anti-American, anti-business, incompetent empty-suited racist bigot to the presidency. It's absolutely no reason to vote for Mike, of course, but he is apparently unaware of that.
That said, how come ol' Mike rabidly supported a candidate who never hesitated to compatre McCain with Bush; while we cannot compare Mike with the downtown interests who own him? Odd, that.
In the end, Mike is wrong in his positions, including the position that would cost every commuter over the criminally stupid I-5 Bridge/Loot Rail debacle over $1200 a year; a fee that, like 99% of the resty of the Bridge Humpers, HE will not have to pay.
And that just goes to illustrate how easy it is for Mr. Heywood to advocate the spending of other people's money, precisely the attitude we DON'T need in this or any other economy.
Mike is endorsed by every living democrat and union, particularly the union scum that will benefit from the massive waste of building an unneeded replacement bridge with loot rail.
Big whoop.
He offers no reason, compelling or otherwise, to get rid of Jeannie Stewart. So, if voting in yet another fringe leftist member of the Amen choir, determined to do the bidding of the Downtown Mafia and the newspaper is what you think needs to happen, then by all means, vote for Mike.
.
Erstwhile, increasingly perennial candidate Mike Heywood swung by to mention his web site for his campaign:
I've put a lot about my positions on my web site, Mikeforvancouver.com. Given the tone and tenor of your posts, I doubt you will find much there to admire or agree with.He's right about that. But, I do admire the fact that he came here to let me know about his website.
Mike Heywood
(Anonymous) 6/16/2009
The problem is that now I have to blow more holes in his positions than a wheel of Swiss cheese.
I've written about Mr. Heywood in the past; those so inclined can search this blog by using the "search" function in the upper left corner.
I'm struck by this phrase on his home page:
"I do not, however, take marching orders from The Columbian, and I am not in the pocket of downtown interests."But a careful review of Mike's positions fail to show where he has any different position from either.
If he's not in their pocket... then how come he sounds precisely like they do?
Does he:
Support the massive and unconscionable waste of an unneeded and unwanted I-5 Bridge replacement that has already wasted tens of millions of dollars in planning?
Support the massive and unconscionable waste of an unneeded and unwanted loot rail system?
Support nailing the people with a massive toll every day as they commute to work?
Oppose giving the people of this county a vote?
Support massive annexations so that Vancouver may achieve the utterly worthless position of the second largest city in the state... as if that mattered?
Support the many tax and fee increases the City has rammed down the people's throats?
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes and yes.
Now, tell me... how does that differ from either the downtown mafia or the Columbian?
Will he continue the battle against the Barnett Mafia ramming a massive casino down our throats? He seems to have avoided a position on that.
So, what we have is an avowed leftist (Much like he was when he was running the Columbian's editiorial page... and much like John Laird is now) who wants to continue fighting for every item the downtown mafia and the Columbian want, but somehow Mike is not taking his "... marching orders from The Columbian, and I am not in the pocket of downtown interests."
It is for the reader to decide if the exact similarity between the Downtown Mafia/Columbian positions and those of Mr. Heywood are sheer coincidence.
Oddly, I seem to remember a relatively recent election where the empty suit that we elected never missed the opportunity to compare John McCain with George Bush.
Now, Mike should be aware of that. After all, he seems to exhibit a high level of pride for his support of that anti-American, anti-business, incompetent empty-suited racist bigot to the presidency. It's absolutely no reason to vote for Mike, of course, but he is apparently unaware of that.
That said, how come ol' Mike rabidly supported a candidate who never hesitated to compatre McCain with Bush; while we cannot compare Mike with the downtown interests who own him? Odd, that.
In the end, Mike is wrong in his positions, including the position that would cost every commuter over the criminally stupid I-5 Bridge/Loot Rail debacle over $1200 a year; a fee that, like 99% of the resty of the Bridge Humpers, HE will not have to pay.
And that just goes to illustrate how easy it is for Mr. Heywood to advocate the spending of other people's money, precisely the attitude we DON'T need in this or any other economy.
Mike is endorsed by every living democrat and union, particularly the union scum that will benefit from the massive waste of building an unneeded replacement bridge with loot rail.
Big whoop.
He offers no reason, compelling or otherwise, to get rid of Jeannie Stewart. So, if voting in yet another fringe leftist member of the Amen choir, determined to do the bidding of the Downtown Mafia and the newspaper is what you think needs to happen, then by all means, vote for Mike.
.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Yet another in the series of moronic plays by the messiah: screwing us in Afghanistan
.
Leftists always think they know better. Afghanistan, the so-called (by the messiah) "good war" is spooling up in a very big, very bad way.
Most observers with any knowledge of the military (Which, of course, leaves out the moron voted in as ACORN in Chief) have suspected that more boots on the ground in Afghanistan are just as appropriate there as they were in Iraq.
Of course, the leftist scumbag leaders in the House and the Senate repeatedly told us all what a bad idea the Surge was; who can forget the moron running the Senate, one Harry"The War Is Lost" Reid, fringe-left Senate Majority Leader who did everything he could to aid the insurgent effort by lying to the American people... something his leader is famous for.
Stanley McChrystal is a four star general. Named to command US Forces Afghanistan, and NAMED TO THAT COMMAND BY THE IDIOT RUNNING THE SHOW, Gen. McChrystal, having examined the situation upon ascension to his command, indicates that he needs 40,000 additional troops.
That number may, in fact, be even larger. Each troop in the field requires logistical support... so, ultimately, that number may even become twice that much.
But there can be no question that many more boots are needed on the ground, both tactically and strategically, to achieve success of the mission.
Failure on the part of our pro-terrorist leadership to immediately provide the needed troops, while not surprising, would be an affront to every serving member of the Armed Forces of the United States; their families.... to anyone who has ever served... or shed their blood.... or made the ultimate sacrifice, particularly in Afghanistan.
President Obama is, of course, so concerned that he's discussed this situation with GEN McChrystal precisely ONCE in the past 70 odd days.
Can you believe it?
THE most important Area of Operations on the planet, and the empty suit has found time in his busy schedule of regular golf, Wednesday parties and flying to Denmark to shill for his masters in Chicago so they can suck hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars out of our wallets to get the 2016 Olympics.
But no time to see McChrystal?
GEN Stanley McChrystal is obviously one of the bravest soldiers in the military today. While not publicly stated, can there be any doubt why the General felt compelled to go on 60 Minutes to take his case to the public while Emperor Obama fiddled?
This is a no-brainer. When it comes to military operations, fringe-left and all other politics must be put aside for the sake of the troops in the field.
The empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot running this country is now causing the unnecessary spilling of American blood because he's an indecisive clown, learning on the job at the expense of the finest men and women this country can produce.
Leftist resistance and support of terrorists; neglect and indecision are the biggest obstacles to whatever "victory" is supposed to look like over there.
Yeah, yeah... I know he's talking to Gates. And other generals talk to Gates before he talks to Obama, as well as the Intel types and so on and so on.
But in the end, the ONLY way the president knows he's getting the real, unfiltered deal; the ONLY way he can be sure he isn't being "handled" is to GET HIS INFORMATION FROM THE SOURCE.
If the president didn't want to talk to the man, then why the hell did he give him the job in the first place?
He doesn't.
And we are dying because of it.
.
Leftists always think they know better. Afghanistan, the so-called (by the messiah) "good war" is spooling up in a very big, very bad way.
Most observers with any knowledge of the military (Which, of course, leaves out the moron voted in as ACORN in Chief) have suspected that more boots on the ground in Afghanistan are just as appropriate there as they were in Iraq.
Of course, the leftist scumbag leaders in the House and the Senate repeatedly told us all what a bad idea the Surge was; who can forget the moron running the Senate, one Harry"The War Is Lost" Reid, fringe-left Senate Majority Leader who did everything he could to aid the insurgent effort by lying to the American people... something his leader is famous for.
Stanley McChrystal is a four star general. Named to command US Forces Afghanistan, and NAMED TO THAT COMMAND BY THE IDIOT RUNNING THE SHOW, Gen. McChrystal, having examined the situation upon ascension to his command, indicates that he needs 40,000 additional troops.
That number may, in fact, be even larger. Each troop in the field requires logistical support... so, ultimately, that number may even become twice that much.
But there can be no question that many more boots are needed on the ground, both tactically and strategically, to achieve success of the mission.
Failure on the part of our pro-terrorist leadership to immediately provide the needed troops, while not surprising, would be an affront to every serving member of the Armed Forces of the United States; their families.... to anyone who has ever served... or shed their blood.... or made the ultimate sacrifice, particularly in Afghanistan.
President Obama is, of course, so concerned that he's discussed this situation with GEN McChrystal precisely ONCE in the past 70 odd days.
Can you believe it?
THE most important Area of Operations on the planet, and the empty suit has found time in his busy schedule of regular golf, Wednesday parties and flying to Denmark to shill for his masters in Chicago so they can suck hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars out of our wallets to get the 2016 Olympics.
But no time to see McChrystal?
GEN Stanley McChrystal is obviously one of the bravest soldiers in the military today. While not publicly stated, can there be any doubt why the General felt compelled to go on 60 Minutes to take his case to the public while Emperor Obama fiddled?
This is a no-brainer. When it comes to military operations, fringe-left and all other politics must be put aside for the sake of the troops in the field.
The empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot running this country is now causing the unnecessary spilling of American blood because he's an indecisive clown, learning on the job at the expense of the finest men and women this country can produce.
Leftist resistance and support of terrorists; neglect and indecision are the biggest obstacles to whatever "victory" is supposed to look like over there.
Yeah, yeah... I know he's talking to Gates. And other generals talk to Gates before he talks to Obama, as well as the Intel types and so on and so on.
But in the end, the ONLY way the president knows he's getting the real, unfiltered deal; the ONLY way he can be sure he isn't being "handled" is to GET HIS INFORMATION FROM THE SOURCE.
If the president didn't want to talk to the man, then why the hell did he give him the job in the first place?
He doesn't.
And we are dying because of it.
.
Monday, November 23, 2009
MORE hypocrisy by the Columbian? When the "will of the people" matters.
.
One of the biggest problems I've got (and there are many) with our local excuse for journalism is their situational ethics.
They wrongly proclaim they're mainstream, with no leftist bent, yet in the last partisan elections, they endorsed democrats and democrats only fr any open seat, from the president on down to the local level.
That, of course, is their privilege. But when they do endorse, they are much less likely to hold those they endorse up to anything approaching the same standard as those they oppose... the largest local examples being that of their glowing endorsement of the empty suited, anti-American racist bigot they wanted to win the presidency and their efforts to rehab the image of the Cowardman, our local congressman who faked a death threat to avoid facing his constituents over the empty suit's socialization health care programs.
He has done a spectacularly abysmal job in every area. He's piled lie upon lie, exaggeration upon exaggeration. But when it comes to those righteous editorials slamming that moron, what do we get?
Nothing but crickets chirping.
So, today's effort, as innocuous as it is, gave yet another glimpse of this left wing rag's double standard. Here's the money quote:
Which, of course, brings us to the crux of the matter:
WHY is the so-called "will of the people" so damned important when this stain on journalism supports what the perceive to be that will, but not nearly so important when this despicable rag fears the probable outcome?
And there's the rub. The stinking, rank hypocrisy of the positions of this waste of wood pulp is but one of the many reasons why they're circling the drain.
IF "The will of the people" is important on an issue like "trails," THEN IT'S IMPORTANT ON ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING ELSE.... LIKE $4 BILLION BRIDGES AND LOOT RAIL THAT WE NEITHER NEED.... OR WANT.
I've been waiting, with growing impatience, for this despicable crap pile to demand that the will of the people be sought in a county wide vote before we waste another dime on studies with pre-ordained outcomes that have vaporized $100,000,000.
This isn't the only instance this garbage heap has talked about the "will of the people" when it suits them. Now, if they'd only apply the SAME standard to this horrific waste of billions of dollars that THEY want, but that THEY won't have to pay for, why, I'd be EVER so grateful.
.
One of the biggest problems I've got (and there are many) with our local excuse for journalism is their situational ethics.
They wrongly proclaim they're mainstream, with no leftist bent, yet in the last partisan elections, they endorsed democrats and democrats only fr any open seat, from the president on down to the local level.
That, of course, is their privilege. But when they do endorse, they are much less likely to hold those they endorse up to anything approaching the same standard as those they oppose... the largest local examples being that of their glowing endorsement of the empty suited, anti-American racist bigot they wanted to win the presidency and their efforts to rehab the image of the Cowardman, our local congressman who faked a death threat to avoid facing his constituents over the empty suit's socialization health care programs.
He has done a spectacularly abysmal job in every area. He's piled lie upon lie, exaggeration upon exaggeration. But when it comes to those righteous editorials slamming that moron, what do we get?
Nothing but crickets chirping.
So, today's effort, as innocuous as it is, gave yet another glimpse of this left wing rag's double standard. Here's the money quote:
In listening to the will of the public, and in supporting the construction and maintenance of trails, local governments show their commitment to recreation and public health
Which, of course, brings us to the crux of the matter:
WHY is the so-called "will of the people" so damned important when this stain on journalism supports what the perceive to be that will, but not nearly so important when this despicable rag fears the probable outcome?
And there's the rub. The stinking, rank hypocrisy of the positions of this waste of wood pulp is but one of the many reasons why they're circling the drain.
IF "The will of the people" is important on an issue like "trails," THEN IT'S IMPORTANT ON ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING ELSE.... LIKE $4 BILLION BRIDGES AND LOOT RAIL THAT WE NEITHER NEED.... OR WANT.
I've been waiting, with growing impatience, for this despicable crap pile to demand that the will of the people be sought in a county wide vote before we waste another dime on studies with pre-ordained outcomes that have vaporized $100,000,000.
This isn't the only instance this garbage heap has talked about the "will of the people" when it suits them. Now, if they'd only apply the SAME standard to this horrific waste of billions of dollars that THEY want, but that THEY won't have to pay for, why, I'd be EVER so grateful.
.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
No media bias here: Thousands show up to see Glenn Beck and who does the Seattle Times write about? 30 protesters.
.
Yup.... thousands of people went to Safeco Field to see Glenn Beck... and who did the Seattle Times write about?
Thirty or so fringe left haters.
The obvious issue here is for the whacked out left to bring in their own mouth piece.
Of course, they don't HAVE one that could fill a stadium... or fill a phone booth, for that matter, but they could at least go through the motions.
Now, I can take Beck or leave him. He drives leftists even more insane then they already are, since being a leftist requires questionable sanity to begin with.... which certainly means he can't be all bad. He comes on strong. But doesn't he need to, given the lies, incompetence, and blood the ACORN in Chief is going to spill?
Anything that drives those lemmings over the edge has to have some redeeming value. Check out leftist scum writer Joel Connelly's hissy fit on Beck for just one example.
People have problems, apparently, with Beck referring to the messiah as a racist. I don't have a problem with it, myself, since the empty suit IS a racist and sat in a black Klan style church for years to prove it.
One wonders, though: those with the problem they may have about Beck (or me, for that matter, since I've referred to Obama as that empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot for months) need to be asked:
Did you people have a problem with all the names your ilk called President Bush?
What's that?
Of course you didn't.
Hypocrites.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that if it were some leftist like Bill Clinton at the stadium, this paper would have worshipped at his feet and ignored anyone disagreeing with him.
.
Yup.... thousands of people went to Safeco Field to see Glenn Beck... and who did the Seattle Times write about?
Thirty or so fringe left haters.
The obvious issue here is for the whacked out left to bring in their own mouth piece.
Of course, they don't HAVE one that could fill a stadium... or fill a phone booth, for that matter, but they could at least go through the motions.
Now, I can take Beck or leave him. He drives leftists even more insane then they already are, since being a leftist requires questionable sanity to begin with.... which certainly means he can't be all bad. He comes on strong. But doesn't he need to, given the lies, incompetence, and blood the ACORN in Chief is going to spill?
Anything that drives those lemmings over the edge has to have some redeeming value. Check out leftist scum writer Joel Connelly's hissy fit on Beck for just one example.
People have problems, apparently, with Beck referring to the messiah as a racist. I don't have a problem with it, myself, since the empty suit IS a racist and sat in a black Klan style church for years to prove it.
One wonders, though: those with the problem they may have about Beck (or me, for that matter, since I've referred to Obama as that empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot for months) need to be asked:
Did you people have a problem with all the names your ilk called President Bush?
What's that?
Of course you didn't.
Hypocrites.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that if it were some leftist like Bill Clinton at the stadium, this paper would have worshipped at his feet and ignored anyone disagreeing with him.
.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
A prime example of why I write with rage: Jobs "saved or created" in congressional districts that don't exist.
.
As a people, we should not require a filter that will enable us to determine when the empty suit is lying and when he and his henchmen are telling the truth.
However, since almost every domestic policy our ACORN-in-Chief has attempted to implement of any size, from the Porkulus through cap and swindle to this utterly moronic plan to give terrorist scum the largest stage on earth in New York... all have been rife with lies, miscalculations and utter incompetence.
Beating them all, however, is the pathetic effort to get us to believe that the economy, so artfully talked down by the empty suited, anti-American racist bigot occupying the White House during his "No Lie I Won't Tell If You Suckers Will Buy It" campaign is now, magically, recovering... all due to the messiah's OWN efforts, you see... thus the recovery.gov campaign website.
And this is where the rage starts. The story speaks for itself, but it does represent the primary reason why I always "mute" the TV or radio whenever the Liar-in-Chief or any of his minions are speaking. What's the point? Their lips are moving, therefore they lie.
This explains it:
Exclusive: Jobs 'Saved or Created' in Congressional Districts That Don't Exist
Human Error Blamed for Crediting New Stimulus Jobs to Nonexistent Places
More:
Why? Why does the scumbag running this country have to lie to us? When can we start believing him? Of COURSE it was "human error" that caused this crap. The "human error" that led to this moron getting caught in yet ANOTHER lie. And it is a lie.
So, when does he start telling the truth so we can believe him when he talks, good or bad?
What's that?
We can't? Ever?
Didn't think so.
.
As a people, we should not require a filter that will enable us to determine when the empty suit is lying and when he and his henchmen are telling the truth.
However, since almost every domestic policy our ACORN-in-Chief has attempted to implement of any size, from the Porkulus through cap and swindle to this utterly moronic plan to give terrorist scum the largest stage on earth in New York... all have been rife with lies, miscalculations and utter incompetence.
Beating them all, however, is the pathetic effort to get us to believe that the economy, so artfully talked down by the empty suited, anti-American racist bigot occupying the White House during his "No Lie I Won't Tell If You Suckers Will Buy It" campaign is now, magically, recovering... all due to the messiah's OWN efforts, you see... thus the recovery.gov campaign website.
And this is where the rage starts. The story speaks for itself, but it does represent the primary reason why I always "mute" the TV or radio whenever the Liar-in-Chief or any of his minions are speaking. What's the point? Their lips are moving, therefore they lie.
This explains it:
Human Error Blamed for Crediting New Stimulus Jobs to Nonexistent Places
Here's a stimulus success story: In Arizona's 15th congressional district, 30 jobs have been saved or created with just $761,420 in federal stimulus spending. At least that's what the Web site set up by the Obama administration to track the $787 billion stimulus says.
There's one problem, though: There is no 15th congressional district in Arizona; the state has only eight districts.
And ABC News has found many more entries for projects like this in places that are incorrectly identified.
Late Monday, officials with the Recovery Board created to track the stimulus spending, said the mistakes in crediting nonexistent congressional districts were caused by human error.
"We report what the recipients submit to us," said Ed Pound, Communications Director for the Board.
Pound told ABC News the board receives declarations from the recipients - state governments, federal agencies and universities - of stimulus money about what program is being funded.
"Some recipients clearly don't know what congressional district they live in, so they appear to be just throwing in any number. We expected all along that recipients would make mistakes on their congressional districts, on jobs numbers, on award amounts, and so on. Human beings make mistakes," Pound said.
The issue has raised hackles on Capitol Hill.
Rep. David Obey, D-Wisc, who chairs the powerful House appropriations Committee, issued a paper statement demanding that the recovery.gov Web site be updated.
"The inaccuracies on recovery.gov that have come to light are outrageous and the Administration owes itself, the Congress, and every American a commitment to work night and day to correct the ludicrous mistakes."
Related
ABC News was able to locate several examples on the government's Web site outlining hundreds of millions of dollars spent and jobs created in Congressional districts that have been misidentified.
For example, recovery.gov says $34 million in stimulus money has been spent in Arizona's 86th congressional district in a project
Why? Why does the scumbag running this country have to lie to us? When can we start believing him? Of COURSE it was "human error" that caused this crap. The "human error" that led to this moron getting caught in yet ANOTHER lie. And it is a lie.
So, when does he start telling the truth so we can believe him when he talks, good or bad?
What's that?
We can't? Ever?
Didn't think so.
.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)