Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Brent Boger, Ann "Gas Tax" Rivers lackey, goes full-blown hypocrite.

One of the many reasons I retired from doing campaigns is that I was sickened by the hypocrisy that was everywhere to a greater or lesser degree.

And the winner of the hypocrite of THIS election cycle award goes to…. Brent Boger.
11 hrs · 
I've been trying to talk less about politics but things happen I feel compelled to comment on. The latest is a hit piece done on Republican Senator Ann Rivers by her opponent Eric Holt. Eric seems to be a nice guy, but he's running a tough race in a Republican-leaning district against one of the most respected Senators in Olympia who can get a lot of support from Democrats.
He attacks Ann for changing her mind on the transportation package. Look at these two pictures. He's changed his mind about something else. The picture on the left is the one he used in his hit piece. The one on the right is what was posted earlier on his Facebook page. He cropped a lot of himself (and his wife and one of his kids out). Why? Is it because he has more tats than the average Pelican Bay inmate? His FB tattoos are a bit over-the-top for the conservative 18th legislative district.
His views are too left and also out-of-line with the district. Yet he seems to have formed an alliance with K.J. Hinton, a local self-styled conservative blogger who has views more consistent with nihilism than conservatism. The mailer is written in Hinton's style and regurgitates his ad nauseam complaints against Rivers posted on his blog.
Not convinced? When Holt was asked who his conservative supporters were, he could only identify Hinton. The people in the room could hardly contain their laughter. (See my first comment below).
Hinton and Holt, because he's embraced Hinton, have no credibility. An angry man of the Left and an angry man of...what I don't know...are working together. Hardly surprising.
Boger, who certainly didn't view me or my blog this way back in the day when HE wanted me to use it to HIS end... or when I defended him repeatedly during, say, his prosecutor’s run or when his now drinking buddy Lou Brancaccio was going to fillet him in his column,... found it convenient to compare his VERY best buddy, Sen. Ann “Gas Tax” Rivers’ betrayal of her district and this county, to the tune of $700 million on her gas tax opposition lie, with what he perceives as an attempt by Eric Holt, Rivers opponent, to cover up tattoos.

Brent Boger snuggling up to the clown who would have gutted him if his fellow leftists hadn't intervened.
Boger is pissed at me because I've done all I can to get rid of that liar he’s attached to closer than most leaches... and the OTHER liar he helped get elected, Scott Weber, who ran on a platform of eliminating his job as an elective position KNOWING he would never do anything to make that happen.
The mailer is written in Hinton's style and regurgitates his ad nauseam complaints against Rivers posted on his blog.
So, Holt is guilty of mailing out the truth about Rivers to this district?  Because I've written about Rivers' lies and dishonesty, Holt shouldn't say anything about those issues?

And isn't it interesting that Boger makes no claim that what I write is false? Or made up? Or even slanted in any way... and that, in fact, he's just whining that I say anything about it at all?

But the dozens of emails I have from Boger related to his campaign for prosecutor among other things and my blog tend to speak for themselves.  Same for Rivers, as far as that goes, where the number is in the hundreds.

Meanwhile, the issue confronting the voters of this district is simple:

Do you reelect a proven liar who has shown she will betray her word and the people of her district if the “price is right?”.

Or do you vote for someone who you may not agree with politically but who appears to be, in every respect, an honest man?

As far to the left a RINO as Boger has proven himself to be, I would have thought that he’d be past his bigotry towards tattoos.  This, oh so much more intelligent and enlightened creature would be the first to tell you that he has no bigotry based on appearance... and, of course, looking at him, that’s by far the best position to take.

But the most bizarre aspect of this is Boger, who seems to think he’s somebody for some reason, claims *I* have no credibility and because I oppose the liar who, if she were to stop suddenly, would cause Boger’s entire head to disappear… and therefore Holt has no credibility either.

Boger, looking and acting like a troll, cannot revise history.  He can call me every name in the book if it makes him feel better.  But that won’t change either his history with me or Rivers’ either, as far as that goes.  And when those two needed me and my blog, they had zero problem asking to use both.

For the record, I have not seen the mailer, had nothing to do with the mailer, and have no idea what it says.  However, for Boger types, mere truth will never stand in the way of his meme.

Note Boger’s careful turn of the phrase: ”He (Holt) attacks Ann for changing her mind on the transportation package.”

That’s not what happened, Brent: no need to lie.

A screen capture of Ann "Gas Tax" Rivers 2012 senate campaign website

She made a pledge to the voters of the 18th District to OPPOSE gas tax and tab fee increases to get elected. (Isn't it odd that Boger avoids calling it what it is?  Why do you suppose he’s such a coward about the whole thing?)

Over 70% of her district opposed the gas tax and tab fee increases that SHE ALSO OPPOSED to get elected and then betrayed us all to implement… the largest gas tax increase in the history of this state.

As a lawyer, I’m pretty sure that even Boger would call violating a pledge a “lie.”  But now... when it comes to Rivers... oh, no.  He's invited to dinner out there... so he can't use the same standards against Rivers that he uses against anyone that's a conservative.

You see, because he and Rivers are so “close” now (She tends to think of him as a family pet, kinda… the Boger-centric conversations Ann and I used to have!) he doesn't care if she lies… about her gas tax scam and her PDC’s where she overstated how much money she’d collected for over a YEAR by $175,000… although the Attorney General might care since that office is reviewing those complaints right now… and so we have this bigotry on full display for anyone and everyone to see.

And that makes this the most bizarre issue of all.

Who knew that a leftist, white bread liberal like Boger would turn bigot for his BFF, Rivers?  And use me as a cudgel of sorts considering back in the day when I worked on his campaigns and he used this blog, or tried to, for his own ends... just like Rivers....

Those commenting under Boger's exercise in wearing out kneepads in front of Rivers on his facebook page are certainly not those I typically agree with.  But I agree with them on THIS, and that Boger can't seem to prioritize between a candidate's appearance and a candidate's complete, proven lack of integrity is inexcusable... but certainly not inexplicable... since I've explained it.

But then, Boger... and Rivers... and Boldt... and Mains... and Stuart... have all tried to get me fired... so I suppose anything is possible.

Hypocrite, much, Brent?  Cause, I gotta wonder: would you be spewing this crap if I was all in for your buddy?

Of course not.  Kind of makes you a clown, don't it?

Politics really CAN make strange bed fellows.  Right, Ann? 

Music to "election" by

Monday, October 24, 2016

More of the Jim Mains influence on his puppet, Boldt: Looks like Boldt's finally dumped Herrera.

As I have been telling you, dear Reader, for the past few years, Boldt has completely flipped to the democrat side.

It's the influence of that leftist punk that runs his political life, Jim Mains, of course...  but that's really not what this is about.  Anyone voting for anyone Mains runs is as moronic as Boldt himself: Mains only runs democrats; his two runnin' buddies, Noland Hoshino (Kicked off the local dems Executive Committee for working for Boldt in 2015) and Temple Lentz, leftists all... and their effort to return this county to democrat control, either actual... or de facto, since the outcome is the same.

It goes without saying that I will not only not vote for any Mains' candidate, but I will do all I can to oppose such candidates... like my moron brother-in-law, Council Chair Marc Boldt.

Mains only works with leftists.  He has taken it upon himself to become the local leftist demigod (Outside of Lying Lefty Lou) and work inside the GOP like the cancer he is to restore this county to democrat control, so he can use this example as a stepping stone to his bigger and better things agenda.

But, no... That's not what this is about: What this is about is Boldt endorsing Jim Moeller's congressional run.

What this is about the local scumbag RINOs doing their best to destroy the local party and install their quasi democrat buddies, like that moron Blom.

This is about the Carolyn Crains and the Brent Bogers who think they are SOOOOOOO smart.... and who did their best to convince us my idiot brother-in-law was something his RECORD clearly indicated he was not.

The irony is that Boldt appears to finally be dumping the woman he is mostly responsible for cursing us to begin with.

Boldt getting chummy with Jim Moeller, democrat candidate for Congress, at a Roman Battan fund raiser recently... just another democrat Boldt supports.

Now, it's not terribly surprising that Boldt would roll out to a democrat fund raiser, particularly when the democrat when I went over to the cardboard cutout of a congresswoman's election website to look to see if Boldt was on her endorsement list...  guess what?


I can understand that.  The number of genuine Republicans endorsing her has been shrinking faster than the budgets that Herrera votes for have been growing... and we're only $20 trillion in debt.

So, while *I* wasn't terribly surprised that she wouldn't have such a list, considering how few Republicans would ask to endorse her, I also wasn't surprised that the Jim Mains produced seduction of Boldt to the "dark side" was ongoing... and the RINOs that rammed Boldt down our throat remain utterly silent in the face of the proof that those same RINOs were lying to us all along.

Don't get me wrong: I don't care if you vote democrat or not.  In fact, my ballot, which is going to be RINO free, likely will look like it was filled out by Moeller himself.

The difference though, is huge: the difference is I stand behind my actions.  They're out there.  I tell you all about them while these fake RINO types work behind the scenes, ignoring those who know, because, as I pointed out, they are SOOOOOOO smart.  And, in fact, I'll be voting for Moeller myself, because I would much rather have a real democrat in there than the fake variety we've got now.

I get why Boldt looks like he's dumped Herrera: she's been worthless since her arrival and it just took him a few years to get where I've always been.

Well, that and the Mains hypnosis... which is so bad that it's like Mains is the county chair and Boldt just does what he's told... kinda like the democratian used to portray him back when I was his legislative assistant some 15 to 20 years ago... and they were so sure that he was MY puppet.

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Confusion over the State GOP campaign: What makes them believe that electing Republicans will stop a state income tax?

The income tax in this state has been, if memory serves, presented to the voters in some form or another on ten separate occasions.  Ten times, the voters have rejected it.

Right or wrong, everyone reading this has to understand that a state income tax CANNOT be implemented without a vote of the people.

Thus, I have two issues with this approach:

2. Either chamber of the Washington State Legislature can initiate an amendment to the state's constitution. Each house (the Washington State Senate and the Washington House of Representatives) must approve the proposal, or a version of it, by a two-thirds vote. If this happens, the proposed legislatively referred constitutional amendment goes on a statewide ballot at the next general election in the state. If it is approved by a simple majority, it becomes part of the constitution.[3]

Having just been freshly screwed by the GOP-controlled State Senate, who allowed the largest gas tax/tab fee increases in this state's history; while simultaneously refusing to put a referendum clause on this tax jack as they used the time-tested democrat ploy of adding a bogus emergency clause to this rip off to make it effectively impossible for the people to gather the needed signatures to put this theft to a vote... I don't believe for one minute that electing anyone in particular will keep an income tax from becoming a problem... GOP or no.

As has been documented here many times, my own 18th District Senator, Ann "Gas Tax" Rivers, ran on a platform of opposing gas tax increases AND tab fee increases to get elected, writing:

...only to betray her district and this county by voting FOR this monstrosity which cost us all a few bucks:

THIS "Republican" put it in WRITING that she would oppose the biggest gas tax increase in the history of this state.

And when the time came, what did she do?  Jam a stick in our eye to take care of her King County buddies by raping our wallets to pay for their boondoggles... costing every man, woman and child in this county in excess of $1500.


Rivers' only regret, according to the video from her town hall meeting of January 9 in Battle Ground?

Not that she betrayed us by shattering her promise... but that she made that pledge at all.

Go to her "issues" page right now and as near as I can tell, the words "income tax" don't appear and even if she claimed to oppose such a tax, how could you believe her?

After all, didn't she also pledge to oppose gas tax increases, etc?  And how did that work out for us?

So the idea that putting or keeping a house or both houses in GOP control as some sort of anti-income tax panacea is simply not true.

The idea that not electing Republicans would result in an income tax somehow is equally, in my opinion, also not true.

The 2/3rds vote requirement and the long history of refusing to implement an income tax prevents that from happening.  But the past cycle taught me well: if you're going o count on the GOP from blowing a hole in our wallets... Then I've got an I-5 Bridge to sell you.

Vote for whomever you like for whatever reason you like.  But do yourself a favor:  don't vote for someone in the GOP because of this.

You're liable to be disappointed.

Friday, October 21, 2016

If only we could believe the media...

One of the problems with our modern information age is the increasingly difficult task of separating fact from fiction.

At every level, media has lost any pretense of fairness or objectivity.  Locally, the cancer on our community has done all they can to shape society into their vision of how things should be... without going through that minor aspect of bothering to consult the people of this county.

Nationally, the lamestream media and their accomplices... everyone from Zuckerberg to Google, has thrown their lot in with a criminal.  They don't even bother to hide their prejudice... their bias... their hatred and their anger at the though of a Trump residency.

Trump cuts the tag off a mattress, so to speak, and Hillary gets tens of millions of dollars of earned media, so to speak and her supporters blind themselves to her crimes, her corruption and her incompetence.

Locally, every allegation against David Madore received massive publicity... even though untrue.  (Yes, I'm well aware that he shot himself in the foot.  I've discussed that here as well, but strategic blunders do not equate to character flaws...)  When the allegations were disproven on the PDC, there was little to no mention of it in our local version of Pravda.

Both locally and nationally, campaigns coordinate with news coverage and lies are presented as truth and those who believe the lies deliberately overlook the inconvenient truths, the blood on her hands, the lies, the crimes she's committed and the corruption at every level of government that has even infected the highest levels of the FBI... a heretofore saintly organization unsullied by the Administration of the day.

As the election moves closer and the ballots are filled out, the efforts by the media to impact the outcome grows.

And my disdain for what they tell us grows with them.

If only they were truthful.  If only they could look beyond their agenda.  If only they just did their jobs and gave us the facts... the unfiltered, unbiased facts... so we could form our own opinions.

But no.  It's opinion masquerading as news.  Endorsements locally based on who's been drinking with Lou, or who buys full page ads for their business or who isn't to the right of Mao.

If only they would tell ALL of the truth... and not just the bits that fit their meme.

If only we could believe the media.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Indicators of who to vote against... most anyone the democratian endorses.

Ballots will be hitting any second, and I'm reviewing the criteria I'm using to make my decisions as to who to vote for.

Our local cancer on our community, The Dmocratian, is a great litmus test as to who to vote against.

Typically, the rag endorses no one unless they're a democrat.

I don't mean by party label; I mean in reality... regardless of what they call themselves.

If the neo-communist cult of personality endorses a candidate, that's like they they believe them to be a democrat where it matters: on their leftist agenda.

As you review their swindle-sheet of endorsements, the pattern becomes clear:

Leftist democrats, Puget Sound liberal Supreme Court justices who make up the law as they go along?


Statewide offices?  (Gov, Lt. Gov, Insurance Commissioner, Public Lands, Auditor, Attorney General, SPI)


Federal  offices/President? (President, senate, congress.)


Legislature?  (Every single office endorsed: democrat or RINO)


County council?


In fact, here’s the breakdown of this supposedly unbiased disgrace to journalism.

Of the seats where two parties are running:

All three Supreme Court justices.

Statewide positions:  six out of seven; and the seventh, Wyman, is another RINO.

Legislative positions:  2, 3, 1, 1 RINO and 1 because of her company’s full page ad revenue (Lefty Lou knows which side of his bread is buttered.)

Federal seats: all 3 are democrats.

Local council seats: 2

The numbers are clear: of the positions available for election, the rag has endorsed a democrat/fake Republican in…. all of them.  All, of course, while that lying punk Brancaccio continually claims his lack of bias.

For me, I won’t be voting for any of them and I appreciate the rag’s handy election round up that enables me to simple either not vote in a race or vote for the opponents of the candidates they endorse.

That does not guarantee that those not endorsed will earn my vote, either.

Refuse to endorse Trump?

I’m voting against you.

Accept money from the Cowlitz as they set about to buy local and legislative government?

I’m voting against you.

Lie to get elected?  (And I’m talking about you, Rivers) and I’m voting against you.

To that end, the local stain on journalism does serve a useful purpose by pointing out, through their endorsements, those unfit to hold elective office.

And for that small service, I thank them.

Do your own research.  Look it up yourself.  Don’t take anyone’s word for it, even mine.  I’m not telling you WHAT to think, I’m telling you TO think.  And remember: the classic definition of insanity is doing the same thing, over and over, while expecting a different outcome.  You send these same people back into their office and expect them to look out for you and keep their promises then you are, in fact, politically insane… and you deserve what you get in the form of bigger government, higher taxes, higher fees and more regulations.

The rest of us?

Not so much.

Monday, October 17, 2016

Why is the left so violent?

Blood has been spilled.  Offices burned.  Cars destroyed...


Why is the left so full of hatred?  Why is it that when people don't agree with them, they get so angry?

Why is it OK for this kind of thing?

Why doesn't it reflect on that criminal democrat running for the presidency?

Can you imagine what we'd be seeing if it had involved the Trump campaign?

Trump supporters have been beaten.  They've been scared.  Their property damaged... destroyed.

They've been attacked in every imaginable way.

Why?  Why is that OK?  Why is political terrorism and censorship acceptable?

Why isn't the leftist leadership speaking out about this outrage?

How much longer until this escalates to bodies?

Time to buy more ammo.

Saturday, October 15, 2016

Courtesy of King5 News: my statewide list of RINOS I will be voting against.

Thanks, King5 News for this handy list!

Chris Vance
Bill Bryant
Mark Miloscia
Duane Davdson
Michael Waite
Steve McLaughlin

Also, of course, our own cowardly Congresswoman, Jaime Herrera.

All of these fake Republicans would rather have #HillBilly Clinton, a criminal psychopath, running this country.

I would rather dive into a pool of molten lava with a boiling hydrochloric acid chaser.

And I will vote against anyone taking a similar position.

I will also be voting against Wyman for her failure to take any action to secure our ballot security for the last 4 years.

I fear for my country. How the left is scamming this election... again.

Two years ago, there was an expose about the thought process behind the Obama Administration's successful efforts to screw us with Obamacare.

The upshot was that those behind this effort concluded, rightfully, that the average American voter is, well, stupid.

That conclusion was properly reached in Obama's reelection, which proved, in fact, the majority of voters in this country, are just that: stupid.  Every leftist from Harry Reid on down lied his ass off to get their boy elected.  And the people let them get away with it.

As a nation, we reelected the worst president this country has ever known.  What other conclusion concerning the voters can be reached?

Now, instead of jettisoning those who have put us in this position, we're appearing to desire to double down on this stupidity because we allow other people to lie us into changing our positions and voting the way they've manipulated us into voting.  They're experts at the art of practicing deception and deflection... masters of the art of bright, shiny object politics... and the American people may be falling for it again.

I'm already reading about what a great job Gov. Pence has done in positioning himself for a 2020 run if Trump doesn't make it this time.

Here's why that won't matter.

What happened to Trump with bogus allegations of sexual and other misconduct will also happen to Pence. And if Trump loses, it won't matter who the GOP runs, this SAME kind of crap will happen to whoever makes it to the 2020 general because it worked to take out Trump.

Doesn't matter that most of it is not true. These guys are following the Alinski rule book to perfection and it's working, if the polls are to be believed, to perfection.

In politics, as in football, you keep running the same play until the other side figures out a way to stop it. If you're explainin', you're losing. Trump is now a million miles off message... defending himself from this fakery... and that's precisely where they want him to be because when he was ON message, he was beating that woman like a drum.

Trump is running a terrible campaign, IMHO, not unlike McCain in 2012.  He's allowed himself to be baited into making stupid statements that only help Hillary.... when there's so many other positive things he could be doing.

There was miles of video out there, including the perfect footage of Joe Biden in the debates saying that Obama wasn't ready to be president... a campaign ad that wrote itself... that McCain never used.

Same situation now: there's all that footage of Obama attacking Hillary and Sanders attacking Hillary and Trump isn't using any of it.

If the GOP can't beat this obvious criminal this time, then they can never beat anybody at any time. And that will include a Mike Pence candidacy to run whatever's left of this country 4 years from now.

Friday, October 14, 2016

Time to put an end to voter fraud. Here's how.

For years now, leftists have been claiming that voter fraud isn't a problem, while most others knew, intuitively if nothing else (Why would ballots and other forms have to be printed in foreign languages if the user was an American citizen?  What would keep anyone from registering to vote since we don't require proof of citizenship and a legal ID?) that it obviously IS a problem.

Leftists lie about this issue for one reason and one reason only: they typically benefit from the illegal vote.

Combine that with the idea that many leftists, such as the Clintons, would sell their own children to get elected and, well, you've got a match made in heaven... or hell, as the case may be.

Recently, more and more proof has surfaced that the left generally are doing all they can to get people... and use people... dead or alive... to vote.  Feast your eyes on this:

Voter Fraud Is Real. Here’s The Proof

Voter Fraud Is Real. Here’s The Proof

Data suggests millions of voter registrations are fraudulent or invalid. That’s enough to tip an election, easily.
John Gibbs

This week, liberals have been repeating their frequent claim that voter fraud doesn’t exist. A recent Salon article argues that “voter fraud just isn’t a problem in Pennsylvania,” despite evidence to the contrary. Another article argues that voter fraud is entirely in the imagination of those who use voter ID laws to deny minorities the right to vote.

Yet as the election approaches, more and more cases of voter fraud are beginning to surface. In Colorado, multiple instances were found of dead people attempting to vote. Stunningly, “a woman named Sara Sosa who died in 2009 cast ballots in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.” In Virginia, it was found that nearly 20 voter applications were turned in under the names of dead people.

In Texas, authorities are investigating criminals who are using the technique of “vote harvesting” to illegally procure votes for their candidates. “Harvesting” is the practice of illegally obtaining the signatures of valid voters in order to vote in their name without their consent for the candidate(s) the criminal supports.

These are just some instances of voter fraud we know about. It would be silly to assume cases that have been discovered are the only cases of fraud. Indeed according to a Pew Research report from February 2012, one in eight voter registrations are “significantly inaccurate or no longer valid.” Since there are 146 million Americans registered to vote, this translates to a stunning 18 million invalid voter registrations on the books. Further, “More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters, and approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.” Numbers of this scale obviously provide ripe opportunity for fraud.

That's the reality.

That the left does not want accurate and legal voter registrations, done by American citizens and American citizens alone, tends to speak for itself.  And it's time to put an end to it.

For years now, I have been demanding that, on a date certain, all voter registrations in the United States be invalidated.


We could set up a period of time, say, 6 months, where we each could register with new voter registrations.  To be accepted, we would have to present ourselves IN PERSON, to either a DMV office with license renewal or a county auditor's office along with a birth certificate or passport or similar proof of identification.

Those unable to do so because of physical infirmity could request that the auditor's office of their county send someone to their location to assist them in filling out their registration.

And on a date certain... say, next August 1st, if you haven't registered with proof of citizenship, IN PERSON, then you can't vote again until you have completed that task.

Is it difficult?  Expensive?  Cumbersome?  Time consuming?

Of course.

But then, how much is the security of our voting system worth?

What if, for example, Hillary gets elected and we discover it was because of illegal voters?

For that matter, what if the DOG CATCHER is elected for the same reason?

Leftists, of course, would flip out at the very idea of it.  But, as I say, that's because they benefit from the illegal vote... which is, in part, why they are so hot to allow illegal aliens to stay and so giddy over the idea of opening our borders to the security risks inherent in unvetted "refugees" who lack the guts to stay home and fight for their freedom.

Naturally, they'll claim that such an idea is racist.  That there would be no restriction based on color and such a plan would be just as likely to nail an illegal from Stockholm as it would from Mexico City is neither here nor there.  They have their boat and they damned sure don't want us rocking it.

At some point, we are going to have to find a way to scrub the voter rolls out.  I've been pondering this for years and the reality is that there is no other way.

If there is one, I'd love to hear it.  But I am sick to death of illegals and dead people voting and it's about time we did something about it.

And now's as good a time as any.

Still waiting on the democratian: $5000 disappears from 2012 Boldt campaign... and not a peep from the rag.

Look, Lynda Wilson's company full page ad and RINO inclination got her the endorsement; if she knocked over a 7-11 and stole a Slurpee machine the rag wouldn't report it.

But Marc Boldt MAY have committed a felony by unlawfully removing $5000 from his 2012 campaign for his personal use... and the rag says nothing about it?

If any leftist out there even THOUGHT about a PDC complaint against David Madore, it was front page news.  Chuckie Green most recently was allowed to lie about Madore in a complaint, for example, that was rightfully tossed on it's head out the door.

I filed a PDC complaint against Boldt because he made $5000 disappear from his campaign by falsely claiming to repay himself a loan from his campaign that he apparently never made TO his campaign.

The Attorney General's office is looking at this, if the PDC Executive Director is to be believed... but that's neither here nor there:

Where's the rag on all of this?

Why haven't they done a story on this about Boldt?

I think we know why; it's a symptom of the same leftist bias that we see at the national level: a bias they don't even bother to deny any more.

Here's the complaint, by the way:
Ticket Number: 1195
Complainant: Kenny Smith
Respondent: Marc Boldt
Created Date: October 29, 2015
Status of Investigations: Investigation of Possible Violation
Description: Kenny Smith filed a complaint against Marc Boldt, a candidate for Clark County Council Chair in 2015, alleging that he violated RCW 42.17A.235 and .240 by failing to file Monetary Contribution reports (C-3 reports) and Campaign Summary Contribution and Expenditure reports (C-4 reports) disclosing contribution and expenditure activities undertaken during the 2015 election cycle.
On September 1, 2016, Kelly Hinton filed a complaint against the 2012 March Boldt Campaign alleging that Mr. Boldt received a $5,000 loan repayment on August 29, 2012, but that the Campaign failed to file a C-3 report and Schedule L disclosing the initial $5,000 loan from Mr. Boldt made to his campaign.

The complaint filed by Kelly Hinton against Marc Boldt has been combined with the earlier Kenny Smith complaint filed against Mr. Boldt. 
The local democrat daily has a rule.  If they like you, they like you, and you could axe murder a school crossing guard and they wouldn't mention it.

Meanwhile, the PDC has had these complaints and others for over a year... and they remain in limbo... likely until after the election date passes.

Wonder why that is?

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Watch the hypocrisy of the left and the RINOs: Obama makes Trump look.... presidential.

We've been treated to the faux outrage of the left and the RINO contingent over a video 11 years old: scum, the lot of them.

Well, now we have video of Obama, taken in 2008 on a campaign plane, where he's showing off his penis, covered as it may be, to the female reporting staff on his campaign aircraft.

Think these same scum are going to condemn Obama?

Think Hillary or any of her minions are going to beat the hell out of the president for doing far worse than Trump?

Hell, no.

This has been up for over 7 years... and not one of these same scum have a problem with it.

You see, it's not just the issue: it's the rank hypocrisy those attacking Trump have when this sort of thing happens.

The result?

Clearly, Obama makes Trump look "presidential" in comparison.