Saturday, October 25, 2014

Why are democrats generally, and the president particularly, lying to us about immigration and so many other things?

The Administration continues to not only ignore immigration law, but then they proceed to lie to us about it.

Why?
Why has this administration become the administration of lies?

Why are democrats at all levels down to the legisdlative, so eager gto lie about the issues confronting us?
The administration shouldn’t be releasing ANY illegal aliens: they should depart each and every one they catch; criminal record or not.

The lack of a criminal record should never be the determinant as whether or not illegals stay here: the only question here is this: are they illegal?
And if they are, then why aren’t we deporting them?

Why is the law so unimportant to the left?  Why do they have to lie about it?  How many times were we assured by the same people who assured us that if we liked our plan, we could keep our plan, etc?
  2014 551 post a comment
The Obama Administration lied last year when they informed Congress and the public that the 2,200 people that the Administration released from incarceration to save money had only minor criminal records. 

USA TODAY, gaining the data from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) through the Freedom of information Act, reports that some of the illegal immigrants had been charged with kidnapping, sexual assault, drug trafficking, and homicide.
GOP members were furious when the data was released. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had told Congress that the inmates who were released were “low-risk offenders who do not have serious criminal records.” Records reveal that ICE was readying itself for budget cuts in February 2013 when it released the immigrants, only two-thirds of whom had no criminal records.
After the new information was released, ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen protested, "Discretionary releases made by ICE were of low-level offenders. However, the releases involving individuals with more significant criminal histories were, by and large, dictated by special circumstances outside of the agency's control."
Sen. John McCain, R-AZ., weighed in that it was "deeply troubling that ICE would knowingly release thousands of undocumented immigrant detainees – many with prior criminal records – into our streets, while publicly downplaying the danger they posed."
Normally, ICE releases immigrants with serious criminal records only if their legal status has changed or if they cannot be deported. Every illegal immigrant held in jail costs ICE an average of $122 a day. Last year, GOP members asked ICE Director John Morton for specifics about the immigrants the agency had released. Rep. J. Randy Forbes, R-VA, asked Morton, "No one on that list has been charged or convicted with murder, rape or sexual abuse of a minor, were they?" Morton responded, "They were not." He added that none of the released immigrants had been charged with child pornography charges. White House spokesman Jay Carney echoed that the prisoners who were released were "low-risk, non-criminal detainees."
Yet an ICE spreadsheet reveals one immigrant from Texas had been charged with aggravated kidnapping and sexually assaulting a child, and others had charges including armed assaults or assaulting police officers. One immigrant had been charged with conspiracy to commit homicide. Two more had charges of aggravated assault using a weapon, and another had been charged with sexual assault.

There’s more, of course.  But why is it as a group, they depend on the lie?
I get that they’re terrified of the results if they told the truth.  I get that they understand that their chances of election or reelection would vaporize if they told the actual truth of what’s going on and what they want to do.

But they are going to get killed at the polls this November anyway: why not show som e guts and tell the truth?
You supported Obama?  Don’t be a coward… admit it.

You want to raise taxes?  Don’t be a coward… admit it.
You want a state income tax?  Don’t be a coward… admit it.

You don’t care what we think or say?  Don’t be a coward… admit it.
That’s one of the reasonably admirable traits of Jim “Molehill” Moeller: he’s a fringe-left whackjob who would make Joe Stalin blush.

But he makes no bones about it.
He doesn’t care what the people think or want; none of that makes any difference to him.

And he’s up front about it. Unlike democrats in, say, the 17th or 18th, who would lie to you about the weather and do it with a smile.
But the democrats have lied to us so much, for so long, and told the truth about so little, that they’ll now automatically lie to anyone about anything and do it forever.

As the campaign thankfully winds down, we’re told that the lies about immigration were budget-driven, for example, when that was a lie.  Yet, I would venture to say, for example, that deporting these criminals… literally criminals… would be far cheaper than the damage they will cause and the lives they will take as a result of cutting them loose to score political points that will harm this country.
It simply boggles my mind that not ONLY do they lie, they’re not even subtle about it.

It’s much like the left around here and their obsession over the CRC/Loot Rail scam.
The people of Clark County HASTE the idea of this project.  Democrats here locally know that, and they are willing to fly their plane directly into the ground nose-first, instead of admitting they were wrong or providing any other options.

Proof of this is simple to achieve:  no democrat in Clark County running for anything has offered ANY alternative to the CRC Scam.
None.

By default, that means the East County Bridge Advisory will pass overwhelmingly, because the left has offered precisely zero alternative.
And that is deliberate because they hope against hope that the MCC falls apart with this election and that the CRC will be brought back to life.

Their failure to offer any alternative is a deliberate political strategy wherein they reiterate that they simply do not give a damn what we thing or what we want.
Democrat Former Commissioner Steve Stuart said it best when, during a regular commissioners meeting, he said:

"And I've said it before: I don't speak for the people.. I will NEVER speak for "the people," I speak for Steve and some of you are going to agree with me and some of you aren't."
That abrogation of democracy is the universally shared view of every democrat running from the legislative level on up.

They CLAIM that they’ll listen and “represent all of us,” but we all know that’s yet another lie.
Briggs, for example, repeatedly demanded that the 18th District legislators ignore the vast majority of their constituents and implement his policies and his policies alone when it came to the CRC/Loot Rail scam.

What kind of ego is even capable of such a thing?  What kind of arrogance is even remotely capable of believing that those who are the majority of a district should be ignored in favor of the minority?
Yet, that is the leftist mindset from down here all the way to the very top.

And I have yet to get anyone on the left to explain it to me.

Friday, October 24, 2014

So.... those running for office... who's for the Charter scam? (Update 2)

To date, this is my take on those supporting the Charter scam:  Those who have yet to come out against it actually support it; because it's easy to claim to me that you oppose it, but if you're a candidate, unless you have the guts to come out publicly then that is worthless.

Candidates can feel free to contact me to correct me.

County Offices:

Commissioner:  Pridemore.

Sheriff: Shane Gardner.

Assessor: Wertz

Clerk:  Pauli-Hammond

Auditor: Kimsey (Who has likely broken the law he wants this passed so badly.)

Legislators:

49th District

No candidate running has come out against it that I'm aware of.

18th District.

Brandon Vick and Mike Briggs.

Bully Winningham

17th District

Paul Harris and McClusky

Monica Stonier

Congress

Bob Dingethal and Jaime Herrera.

VanNortwick tells me that he opposes the Charter without equivocation.

I am given to understand that both Colas and Lasher oppose the Charter.

Evidence is out there that Stewart, Weber, and Townsend oppose the Charter.

Golik has not taken a position due to appearance of conflict issues.

Chuck Atkins declared weeks ago he is opposed.

Leftists are busting their girdles over the Jeanne Stewart independent expenditures but are remaining silent on the millions spent to buy initiatives.

Two Initiatives near and dear to the local leftist heart are the gun grabbing initiative I594 and the WEA "rape your checkbook" multi-billion dollar effort, I-1351.

Locally, around $89,000 has been spent on independent expenditures for Jeanne Stewart.

These same leftists of course say nothing about the quarter million or so the WEA has wasted on Monica Stonier, because, as a democrat.... that's different.

It's ALWAYS "different" for the Left.

But of note to me today were the heavy hitters behind the gun-grabber initiative, I-594.

Like Suzan DelBene, who spent $3 million of her own money on her campaign for the WA01 congressional seat to the deafening silence of our local left (Yes, DelBene is a democrat... so that, as always... is "different.) our local leftists who rabidly support the gun grabbers have responded with something less than a collective yawn over the millions dropped on 594.

Billionaire former New York Mayor Micheal Bloomberg has donated a paltry $1.979 million to this effort... like he's going to live here?  Like he doesn't have heavily armed security?

Billionaire Billy Gates has donated a million.  Like he doesn't have heavily armed security?

Nick Hanauer dumped a million into this idiocy:  Like he doesn't have heavily armed security?

Billionaire Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer drops a cool million on it... Like he doesn't have heavily armed security?

Billionaire Paul Allen, owner of the Seahawks and the Blazers... dropped a cool half-million into this insidious effort... And HE doesn't have heavily armed security?

And what do our local fringe-leftists have to say?

Absolutely nothing.

That, you see, is ALLLLLL different.

To be a leftist is by definition to be a hypocrite.  And I want none of it.

Another reason to vote "no" on I-594: their mailers are false.

First of all, they're targeting women because they believe them to be stupid.

There was a piece in our PO box yesterday that described a horrific situation"
"In 2012 my mother was shot by her husband, a man we knew was violent.  Just a year earlier he was arrested for strangling her."
That, of course, does not mean he was convicted of it... and with words having meaning and all, don't you think they would have used the word "convicted" if he had been?

It doesn't say, of course, how or under what circumstances the shooter gain control over the weapon in question.

It doesn't say if he bought the gun, borrowed the gun, stole the gun, built it from spare parts or even come close to mentioning if this gun grabbing initiative would have made any difference whatsoever in this outcome.

It doesn't say that if this initiative passed, he wouldn't have used a knife, or run this poor woman over with a truck or been completely unable to find a way to harm her.  It doesn't say, but certainly infers, that the woman in question was killed.

Instead, it shows a blond and ascribes a quote the campaign made up for her and infers that this initiative would have made a huge difference in that outcome.

They just don't happen to say how or why.

This shooting, in fact, is blamed on a "gun show loop hole," when it doesn't even mention that this guy bought the gun in question FROM a gun show or that he didn't undergo a federally mandated background check.

It doesn't say he was a convicted felon.

It doesn't say how passage of this idiocy would have made any difference whatsoever, or how it would have stopped this tragedy.

Then it falsely claims that:
 "Initiative 594 gives us the chance to help protect women like my mom by closing the background check loophole."
Of course, it doesn't mention HOW that would happen. Had this been in force in Connecticut, for example, it would have made no difference whatsoever in the Sandy Hook shootings.

In the end, this is a gun-grabbing attempt designed to punish the law-abiding as a result of the law-breaking.  For example:
Widows and heirs beware: If your spouse died and you found a couple of handguns in your husband’s sock drawer 61 days after death, then you’d be an accidental felon.

I-594 only allows you 60 days to register those guns; after that, they’d become contraband. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and intent to commit a crime is not an element written into 594. Why write a law that makes inheritance of grandpa’s old guns a crime?

The father who loans a hunting rifle to an adult son during hunting season would commit a misdemeanor (upon the first violation).  When the rifle is returned, both father and son would be two-time offenders, and thus felons under I-594.

Women are targeted by several provisions. Instructors could no longer provide loaner firearms during introductory women’s self-defense classes. And if your sister were being stalked and in fear of her life, and you loaned her a firearm, you would both be criminals. I-594 has an exception to “prevent imminent death,” but the legal definition of imminent means “about to happen.”
It will increase the number of criminals because the passage of this stupidity guarantees that I will become a criminal, since I have zero intention of following the idiotic elements of the law they propose.

This is, in fact, another example of where millionaires are buying an outcome... and our local leftists remain silent about both the fact that the leftists financing this are spending millions, and that the vast majority of those leftists come equipped with very much armed security.

They want their people to have guns... they just don't want us to have guns.

Billionaire former New York Mayor Micheal Bloomberg has donated a paltry $1.979 million to this effort... like he's going to live here?  Like he doesn't have heavily armed security?

Bill Gates has donated a million.  Like he doesn't have heavily armed security?

Nick Hanauer dumped a million into this idiocy:  Like he doesn't have heavily armed security?

Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer drops a cool million on it... Like he doesn't have heavily armed security?

Paul Allen, owner of the Seahawks and the Blazers... dropped a cool half-million into this insidious effort... And HE doesn't have heavily armed security?

Do not be fooled.  I'm all about laws that make a positive difference and increase accountability on those who would ignore our requirements when it comes to firearms as they sit.  But claims that "40,000 people have been stopped from purchasing firearms because of background checks" without also mentioning that precisely NONE of those who failed a background check have been prosecuted for the attempt as provided by law go to the heart of the matter:

Before they punish those of us who possess firearms for protection, perhaps they should more fully enforce/prosecute  those who break the firearms laws we already have. Until they do...

Don't be fooled.  Vote NO on I-594.  It fixes nothing, changes nothing and criminalizes things you simply wouldn't believe.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Jeannie Stewart gets $89,000 in independent expenditures; fringe left nutters flip out: Monica Stonier gets a quarter million from the WEA and not a peep.

To be a local fringe-left nutter is to be a hypocrite.

It's that simple.

Jeannie Stewart's campaign has apparently (I haven't checked... and since when is the democratian a credible source?) benefited from $89,000 from somewhere.

Monica Stonier's campaign is benefiting from almost a quarter of a million dollars from the WEA, with likely more to come.

Are these same fringe-leftist swine bitching about that?

Of course not.

And that's just one of the many reason the leftist haters are so despicable.

Truth being stranger then fiction, I have no trouble with these slime whining that they're being outspent on this issue: it's a low to zero priority for democrats as a party, since they're fighting for their lives in this election legislatively (That is, money for legislative races) but I have a HUGE problem with their institutional failure to hold democrats receiving huge checks from out of state or out of area funders, given how much they've whined and sniveled over David Madore's money.

Have you seen any complaints from these scum over, say, George Soros?  How about fringe-leftist whacker billionaire Tom Steyer?

Seen them complain over Suzan DelBene spending $3 million plus of her own money on her congressional race in the WA01?

Bully Loserham has popped her girdle over Our Liz taking $500 from "Big Oil," although she even has to lie about that, claiming the figure is in the "thousands," all the while remaining absolutely silent about her fellow democrats sucking at the same trough, including our own fringe-left nutter, Jim "Molehill" Moeller... and the entire democrat caucus and several other democrat candidates and organizations.

God, it is said, hates a hypocrite.

These people are ALL hypocrites.

I really don't care where Jeanne Stewart's money came from since she had zero control or input over it, just like WEA lackey ("Pitch-perfect singer..." wasn't that what the cancer on our community called her?) Monica Stonier's campaign gets hers... since she has zero control over it, either.

But these fringe-left morons are falsely claiming it violates the law, or in the case of Pridemore, falsely sniveling about an ethics violation.

Meanwhile, that millions are spent by and on leftist candidates doesn't even cause a ripple among these scum.

And that's what pisses me off the most.

The C3G2 haters ban people, and then whine like cut cats when they are, in turn banned.

They lie like they breathe (How long did they lie to us about this "not being about David Madore?") and then whine when it doesn't work.

Vote for them or their agenda?

They're lucky we don't spit on them in our disgust. 

When lies are all you've got left: Mussolini Mikey Briggs

As a fringe-left whack job, Mussolini has few peers.  He knows now that he's going to get crushed by perhaps THE weakest incumbent in the legislature, Brandon "Lumpy" Vick.

So, being broke because no one will give a loser like this any money, he's reduced to this kind of idiocy:
 

For Mussolini, this is an outright lie on every level:

He will not "respect" you if you're wise enough to disagree with him: he'll ignore you and completely disregard your view.

Do you think for one second this clown would vote against the CRC/loot rail scam if it were to come back up again? Do you think this partisan hack would vote against an income tax, or do anything but bend us over on McCleary?

"Respect?"

He doesn't know the meaning of the word.

How bad does is suck to be a democrat? This bad:

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

The C3G2 hatred: they finally admit it's about Madore.

For the past several months, I've been saying it's all about Madore.

It's NEVER been about "good governance."

It's ALWAYS been about leftist hatred and arrogance.

These scum can't touch the people who killed their decade long dream of raping our local wallets to the tune of $100 million dollars per year for the next 45 years in tolls: let's remember: Greg Kimsey, who seems to have broken the law, deliberately, and lie about the Charter scam was a CRC supporter big time... so he joined with the rest of the leftist haters to attack Madore because he is one of those most responsible for stopping the biggest rip off this corner of the United States has ever seen.

All the months I pointed this out.

All the months the fringe-leftist haters denied it.

And now this is the ad confirming it.

Remember, readers: they've been lying about everything concerning their motives for this rip off.... isn't it time you wondered what else they're lying about?

Well, now you know:



 I have an incontrovertible political law:

If you have to lie to get elected (Most democrats) get your project built (CRC) or to get your initiative/proposition passed...(I-502 (Pot) and the Charter)....

Then you shouldn't BE elected, your project shouldn't BE built and your initiative/proposition shouldn't BE passed.

This is one of those times: Vote NO on the Charter.

You'll be glad you did.

Vick continues to lie about his committee assignments.

For most of his tenure, Brandon Vick hasn't done spit. 

Nothing.  LESS than nothing, because he's been getting paid for it.

He blew off his entire first year, attempting to change precisely dick, satisfied with every law, every rule, every regulation to the point where he didn't even bother to introduce any legislation for a year.

He has, legislatively, accomplished precisely nothing.  A rock could and would have the same list of accomplishments.

And, he continues to lie about "committee assignments."

The rag went along with the lie, of course, knowing it wasn't true.  But here's the fact of the matter, based not only on my SIX years of experience on legislative staff, but also on what insiders I know up there have kept me informed about.

Vick has 6 assignments to committees only because he begged leadership to temporarily let him have vacancies when they came up... purely and entirely as a political ploy to drown out those of us attempting to hold this clown accountable for wasting our time and effort during his abortive tenure in the House.

There's a reason he keeps lying about the committees, and I KNOW he's lying because it is functionally impossible to be on 6 committees when it matters: during session.

When session actually starts, it won't take him long at all to go back to the normal three... if any of the committees will have him.

Meanwhile, he lies about leadership (He has none and is, in fact, a wallflower back bencher) getting called into negotiations (Only to take coffee orders, because no one else cares what he's got to say) and then the stupidity of this committee garbage.

Relying on a democratian endorsement certainly should be all the indication you need that, as a Republican, Vick is worthless.

The only problem is that Mussolini Mikey Briggs is even worse.

Still, Vick needs to actually get off his ass and worry more about serving us then he does the free lunches he's loved so much as an office perk.

Vick, unfortunately, will win because the GOP could run a brick in the 18th and win.

He's living proof of that.

Neo Communist Winningham: I'm a compassionate conservative.

Things are not going well for the left in this country today.

In this election, they have an anchor around their neck called Obama, arguably the worst president this country has ever known... so bad, in fact, that I long for the days of the well-meaning buffoonery of Jimmah Carter.

On the first Tuesday of November, the left stands to get massacred.  As bad as it's going to be for them... and it's going to be horrific... it could have been a slaughter of epic proportions had the GOP just unified behind some messaging... not unlike the massacre of 1994 where we had the Contract With America... and where electing Republicans was essentially a known quantity as to what was going to happen based on the "contract," now... they have nothing.

Pity.

As a group. local democrats stand as a prime example of the tinnest ears in politics.

The multiple failures of Obama have impacted everyone negatively, unless, of course, you're an illegal alien from south of the border.

Here, we have a group of narcissistic leftists who brook no opposition to their positions, philosophies, plans, projects or, in the case of the hated charter scam, their plan to overturn the election of 2012.

A prime example of that idiocy are the two democrats "running" in the 18th District, Maureen "Bully" Winningham and Mussolini Mikey Briggs.

Both are going to undergo political humiliation this November 4th; neither are fit for elective office; one, Winningham, is essentially a psychotic political liar, the other, Briggs, holds positions so far out of the mainstream of the politics of the 18th District that he's more closely aligned with Mao than he is the people...and he's been known to riff a few lies himself.... but nothing close to the psychotic drivel of Bully Loserham.

Loserham is as much a fringe-left hater as Jimmy "Molehill" Moeller... even, perhaps, more so.

Her public presentation shows what a despicable political cretin she really is: here's a video summary prepared by Lew Waters to illustrate the point:



The hell of it is, by now... and in fact, several months ago, Bully, in her own swinish little way, KNEW she was going to be assassinated at the polls here.

She goes full hypocrite by attacking Our Liz for taking oil money/train money when many, if not most... and the entire democrat caucus itself, has taken oil/train dollars as a group, and specifically, our own local fringe-left whack job, Molehill Moeller.

This is the kind of thing that firmly affixes her to the "scum" level.

She has the right to be stupid and is fully exercising that right by pointing out that Pike took this money WITHOUT mentioning that several of her fellow democrats have done the same.

Attack someone else for doing something?  Fine.  That's politics.

FAIL TO MENTION OR HOLD YOUR OWN SIDE ACCOUNTABLE FOR DOING THE EXACT SAME THING?

That's rank hypocrisy.  That's the worst kind of lie... a lie of omission,... a lie where you KNEW what was going on, but refused to allow that to get in the way of your "my opponent bad" meme.

And after all of that... this union scammer (Gotta wonder, did SHE tell all those unions that she was doing all she could to help her employer outsource 50,000 jobs to India?) THEN proceeds to spew THIS stupidity in the democratian puff piece they did for her:
Winningham said she considers herself a compassionate conservative who believes officials should take care of social needs as well as be fiscally conservative.
I literally threw up.

This CRC scamming witch wants to tax us broke.  And yet, she's reduced to a pathetic attempt to portray herself as a Republican in sheep's clothing.

These are the depths to which they've sunk.  To me, the question is simple: will this whining leftist sycophant even break 60%?

I don't think so.  But what do I know?

And Bully, if it isn't too late, maybe you should demand that Heather Stuart refund those thousands of dollars she's scammed from you.  Clearly, whatever she's given you ain't been worth it.

Never liked tattoos, but if I-594 passes, I'm looking to get this one:





The phrase was a motto of the Texas revolution, and has become a favorite of anti-gun control activists. It’s said that when the Persian emperor Xerxes demanded King Leonidas and his Spartan army of 300 men lay down their arms and surrender at the battle of Thermopylae, Leonidas replied “Molon Labe,” which is Greek for “Come and take [them].”

Might go with the one that has a Spartan helmet in between the words.

Why is Greg Kimsey directly lying about the Charter? Has the GOP kicked him out yet?

I have posted and proven many times that once (if) the charter scam is voted in, we can NEVER get rid of it.

So why is Greg Kimsey, fringe-leftist fake Republican, CRC scamming C3G2 hater lying about it?

Look, the only hope these leftist haters have is to lie.  If they were to tell the truth about both the substance of this idiocy and their motives behind it, they'd be lucky to get 1% of the vote.

But Kimsey, who likely violated the law with his lie of a campaign piece he stuffed into the voters pamphlet, is the Auditor,.  And as much as his hatred of all things conservative warps his judgment, he should know better.

So, why did he babble THIS lie over on David Madore's Facebook page?
"Further: If voters adopt a home rule charter, voters may subsequently repeal that charter."
Exclusive of the fact that Kimsey and his ilk demanded that it would require around 50,000 signatures to even modify the charter, IT CAN NEVER BE REPEALED.

Kimsey is flat out, dead wrong.

Is it possible he was ignorant of that kind of garbage?  He's not the first slimeball shilling this garbage to lie about this: Mussolini Mikey Briggs did it as well.

If he didn't know, then how can he babble about what the charter will or will not do?

And if, as is more likely, he DID know, then why is this clown lying?

Guess what: the democratian isn't going to address this issue.  They know it would crush this at the polls if they admitted we were being lied to.

But I'm going to remember this.  Just like I'm going to remember that Kimsey was one of the scum shilling for the CRC Rape.