Showing posts with label lying scum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lying scum. Show all posts

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Is the stupidity of the bridge cheerleaders genetic?

.
So, another "have to build it the way the paper wants it" article in the Cancer on the Community (aka, The Columbian) website.

We actually HAVE 6 through lanes; they WANT 6 thru lanes... but they feel compelled to dress it up with 4 wasted lanes... all to bring loot rail into Vancouver (which is, of course, the only reason to replace an otherwise perfectly functional, safe, serviceable bridge) so we go out and pay consultants to tell the CRC what they want to hear (The very idea that they're not doing any one of a half dozen better, cheaper, more realistic ideas is proof of that) an voila'! Any smaller, cheaper version of the bridge isn't good enough.

Well, the moron writing this article tells us:
“The conclusion that jumped out to us was a capacity issue,” said Ted Rutledge, URS transportation manager based in Denver. “Both northbound and outhbound[sic] were really at or over capacity. So based on that alone, it’s not going to meet the need.”

Well, the "experts" have already shown that a new bridge with their fantasy 12 lanes won't do any better, and we've known that for years:

Congestion on new I-5 bridge back to today's level by 2030, study finds

Planners and elected officials who back the project are aware of the shortcomings, but say it's better than doing nothing

FACTBOX

Monday, July 07, 2008
DYLAN RIVERA
The Oregonian Staff

A $4.2 billion project designed to relieve the Interstate 5 bridge bottleneck will -- in two decades -- return congestion to about the same level drivers experience today.

Less than 30 mph traffic at the new Columbia River bridge will thwart trucks and commuters alike for 3.5 hours each morning by 2030, up from about two hours today. And thousands driving south into Portland every day will stack up for miles behind the already difficult Rose Quarter bottleneck -- a separate problem altogether.

Much more:

So, here, we have an outcome anyone with 2 firing brain synapses could arrive at for free, unlike the tens of millions that have been wasted for the billions they WANT to waste that has vaporized already:

NO bridge, of ANY size, will do ANYTHING to decrease congestion or increase freight mobility; which, along with safety (which, according to Don Wagner, doesn't apply here) stand as the only justifications to spend transportation dollars in the first place.

But the fact is that no other solution was EVER acceptable to the downtown mafia, who want to blow a $100,000,000 per year hole in our local economy for tolls to pay for a horrific, multi-billion dollar waste of money because THEY want loot rail in downtown Vancouver while WE have to pay for it.

The obvious solution to addressing bridge capacity is to build additional bridges... and screw loot rail.

We don't want it, we don't need it, we've crushed it at the polls, and if my brother in law had any guts, we'd be crushing it at the polls AGAIN this November to put an end to this turd.

So, The Steaming Crap Pile again ignores the massive opposition to ANY bridge replacement idea as formulated, and they do so under the guise of their self-serving brand of agenda-furthering "journalism."

Sunday, June 20, 2010

John Laird is a Wienerville Whiner? Doesn't he have a mirror in his hovel?

.
Wienerville is the Planet of The Columbian, where morons with keyboards seem to believe they're imbued with the right to not only tell US how to live... but to coerce both us and government into meeting THEIR expectations... as if they are somehow superior to our own.

They're not.

Whoda thunk it? A moron who thinks when authority yells, we should just cave to whatever they want, what those of us who pay the bills want be damned.

I AM surprised that Laird would bitchslap Koenninger with this observation describing that spender of our money and trampler of our rights thusly:
Well, the dominant trait is worshipping the status quo, or maybe even the status
quo ante. If you are overly reminiscent, if you abhor change and believe our
best days are behind us, then you might be a Hound of Whinerville.
How many dozens of "back in the day" columns has Tommy the K subjected us to? How many reminiscing efforts have leapt off his keyboard? That's no particular reason, of the many reasons, to jump up in that moron's face and remind him how much harm he's caused this community and some of the people in it.

Why, using The Laird of Planet Wieinerville philosophy, we can just get rid of democracy altogether, instead of the situational employment so advocated by the cancer of our society.

Here's an example of this simpleton's babble that fits that bill completely:

Another characteristic is chronic disregard for established expertise. If you believe another guy’s education, training, certification and experience make him no smarter than you, then you might be a Hound of Whinerville.

Here. Let me translate:

If someone with a title or a bunch of letters after their names tells us to do something, well, by golly, we're retarded if we just don't do what we're told!

One of the many reasons to trash the rag and their efforts to ignore the will of the people is this kind of attitude.

Take, for example, the crock of cow crap they babble on about incessantly, AKA the unneeded and unwanted I-5 Bridge replacement/loot rail project. Lying, utterly worthless polls, but a psychotic fear of putting this up to the only poll that matters.... a vote of the people.

Using unlimited amounts of OUR money to go out and find the millions-sucking consultants who agree with them and their perspective while simultaneously ignoring those who don't. Building a complete waste of money THEY won't have to pay for.

And that, of course, is what makes the babble off of Laird's keyboard criminally stupid:

Completely ignoring the other side.

In everything from a pre-ordained outcome study where many people, including me, knew months in advance that the only acceptable outcome to the Scum at the Planet of The Columbian would be the absolutely unnecessary replacement of the I-5 Bridge entirely to get loot rail into Vancouver while completely ignoring the many cheaper, much more viable alternatives; to supporting their position with lying, utterly worthless polls, this stain on journalism has done everything they can to burden this local area with an unnecessary, multi-billion dollar debt.

And the rank hypocrite leading the pack?

John Laird.

Here's just one example: Laird babbles about ignoring "another guy’s education, training, certification and experience."

In Wienerville, they have all been trained to "Respech mah authority!" Well, if THEY LIKE that authority.

Just yesterday, these morons attacked a Woodland city councilman for his fine effort to respect the law these clowns don't care about, when he ran a resolution supporting Arizona law HB 1070.

Exclusive of the fact this despicable rag lied about the impacts of this resolution, what else did they do?

Well, they ignored the "education, training, certification and experience" of the councilman in question.

So, what does that make these scum?

Taking it to the next level, the idiocy of The Columbian's positions in this regard, COMPLETELY ignores the "education, training, certification and experience" of those who examined this steaming, economy-killing crap pile and discovered it was a total waste of time and billions, but that scum like Laird felt that it was "better than nothing."

So, when LAIRD comes out and does the exact same thing he accuses other of doing... what does that make him?

I think we know the answer to that, don't we?
.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Jon Stewart disassembles Keith "Fringe Left Scumbag" Olbermann

.
Keith Olbermann is scum. He and his ilk?

Scum.

The network they work for?

Scum.

In fact, he's SUCH a waste of skin and space that Jon Stewart took the time to, well, ask a few questions about him.

It's about 7 minutes or so. Enjoy.... I know I do.


.

Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Yet ANOTHER Dem bails: Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Criminal) pulls the pin.

.
With the stench of corruption permeating everything democrats do, yet another of those most responsible for the collapse of our mortgage and banking system read the writing on the wall and saw....

...pain.

Criminal Christopher Dodd, Senator from Connecticut, wised up and decided to join with the other weasels and bail out.

The political bleeding has just started for the empty suit.

But then, we knew that, right?
.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

In my view Dec 19: new web site doesn't change the fact: the paper still sucks.

.
The now immortalized phrase of Sarah Palin, used to such massive impact in her VP acceptance speech concerning lipstick on a pig not changing the fact that it's still a pig certainly applies with the moronic web site change the Columbian is so giddy about (Read Brancaccio's tripe for a quick snapshot... but warning: don't eat first, because you won't be able to keep it down.)

What these idiots don't understand is that without a substantial change in content, this paper has no chance. None. The best they could hope for would be a Seattle PI kind of operation.

Continuing on as a leftist propaganda rag isn't going to increase the numbers of people putting their money down on the counter. In fact, it will continue to have the opposite effect.

The paint job ultimately won't matter. Bragging about the "depth" of this despicable rag's efforts without addressing the hard left bent and selective reporting means there wasn't any substantive change, even if the jumble of a web site is different.

For example, this idiocy:

Jeers: To Portland Mayor Sam Adams and others who complain that the Columbia River Crossing project will only shift congestion into the Rose Quarter area of Portland. For one thing, a careful analysis of traffic patterns shows that two-thirds to three-fourths of motorists using the Interstate 5 Bridge enter and exit the freeway between Hazel Dell and North Portland, considerably north of the Rose Quarter bottleneck.

The opposition also fails the logic test. Even if every driver was headed to Adams’ comfortable downtown office, why would the mayor give up so easily on fixing Portland’s problems? In the 100 years a new crossing will last, isn’t it ridiculous to think that Portland won’t address traffic in its own city center? Or, maybe bridge opponents will convince everyone in the city to just ride bicycles and take the train.

This represents an out and out lie.

That this despicable waste of paper has an editorial policy of lies is why it's the laughing stock here locally, and among the reasons no one buys this POS.

This disgusting stain on journalism accuses the opposition of that with which they are the MOST guilty, the "logic test."

There is no reason of any kind to replace the current bridge. None.

The current bridge is safe. The current bridge has the same number of through lanes as the proposed bridge replacement. A new bridge will do absolutely nothing to improve freight mobility or decrease congestion. In fact, the ONLY thing a new bridge will do is bring the massively expensive and unwanted loot rail into Clark County. And, of course, a new bridge won't be paid for by the feces demanding it the loudest.

And these morons accuse the opposition of "failing the logic test?"

What hypocritical scum they are. And what a sickening rag, lipstick or no, they work for.
.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Montana Senator Max Baucus (D-Tiger Woods) had his girlfriend working on his divorce 8 months BEFORE the Baucus's even SEPARATED??????

.
(Thanks to poster "Dave" for correcting the state I had originally listed. It IS Montana, and not Wyoming as I earlier indicated that Baucus represents in the Senate. My bad, and I apologize.)

Yeah... it takes a real piece of work to have a staffer who's a girl friend... a staffer being paid to have sexual liaisons with you using tax payer dollars... and a staffer working on your divorce 8 months before you even separate from the poor woman you're married to.
Sen. Max Baucus’ former state director — and now his live-in girlfriend — met at least twice with the senator’s divorce attorney to discuss the Baucuses’ divorce eight months before the senator and his wife, Wanda, separated.

The meetings took place in the summer of 2007, according to billing documents obtained by Lee Newspapers.

Contacted this week by Lee Newspapers and asked about these documents, Wanda Baucus said she knew nothing about those discussions in 2007 and that the couple had never had a discussion about getting a divorce.

Baucus is obviously scum. He should resign immediately and take that inflatable doll with him.

And while you're at it, Senator, take Ensign and Vitter with you.

Those that lead us should have some basic level of character. They should have some level of integrity.

Do we expect those who apply for the job to be saints?

Of course not.

I'm no saint. Few of us are. But at some point, there has to be a line. We would, I believe, want those who lead us to have, and exhibit, at least a basic understanding of honor.

For those like Baucus, Ensign and Vitter, this definition seems to have escaped them. This leads to the crux of the matter:

If these scum are willing to compromise on their honor in their personal lives... how difficult would it be for them to compromise their honor in their public lives?

Why... not difficult at all.

We have enough trouble with out clueless leadership at the top. Now, we need those with integrity and character they actually live by to lead us... to blunt and then reverse the horrific damage this out of control empty suit is doing to us.

But that's just me.
.

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

The subtle bigotry of Reid's Expectations.

.
We are cursed with two grade-A Prime bigots running the Senate.

First, we have the Number 2, Dick "Yeah, I said our troops are Nazi's... what about it?" Durbin and Harry "I forgot that DEMOCRATS are the slavery party" Reid.

Yesterday's abysmal performance in support of the fringe-left's socialized medicine scam was a sickening reminder of what people can do TO our country, instead of FOR our country.

When control of the Legislative Branch reverts to the GOP in a year or so, and the scum doing this to us are shut out of all the meetings required to undo their massive damage... what will they do then?

Where to begin? With a straight face (okay, an undertaker’s face) Reid asserts three outrageous falsehoods:

1) Republicans supported slavery.
2) Republicans opposed women’s suffrage.
3) Republicans opposed the Civil Rights Act.

The first is too idiotic to refute. Perhaps Sen. Reid (D-Hinky Land Deals) has forgotten that Abolition was the cause upon which the Republican Party was founded, and that the first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, is known today as the Great Emancipator. Clearly, the “world’s greatest deliberative body” has a moron for a majority leader. But wait – there’s more!

Michael Walsh over at Big Government has much more. But if I was a leftist today, I'd be hanging my head in shame at the scum calling the shots.
.

Saturday, December 05, 2009

Jeers to the morons at the Columbian for slamming the voters of Clark County over R71

.
In what seems like one of the usual, and therefore, pathetic, efforts by John Laird in his babbling editorial; that scumbag again takes the opportunity to slam the majority of people in the region his despicable rag of a paper serves who were wise enough to oppose the institutional discrimination in R 71.

That it passed statewide might mean something to Laird and his boyfriend, but to the rest of us, it once again means that King County runs the entirety of the state with it's useful tools like Laird who front for their fellow fringe-leftists every chance they get.

Yes, in the end, those who had a clue simply couldn't overcome the leftist idiocy that runs this state. We had no difficulty, however, overcoming the rank hypocrisy and stupidity of morons like Laird here, locally. That was done with ease, and yet that scumbag couldn't help but insult those of us smart enough to just say "no" to yet another incremental step of mainstreaming a behavior as if it were on the same level as race, gender, or any other actual minority trait.

Here's the moronic quote of the day:
Jeers: To critics of last month's Referendum 71 who insisted that expanding benefits to domestic partners would trigger all kinds of social upheaval. Fortunately, R-71 was approved by 53 percent of voters statewide (Clark County voters rejected the measure by 54 percent), and guess what happened on Thursday? Virtually unnoticed, Senate Bill 5688 (which was affirmed by R-71) quietly took effect and as best we can tell, the world did not end and the institution of marriage seemed to be surviving quite well.

We should've known that no crisis would have erupted on Thursday because, since R-71 passed on Nov. 3, the number of domestic partnerships has seen a rapid increase with no apparent impact on anyone's health or well-being. About 90 same-sex couples and opposite-sex senior couples have been registering each week since the election, about double the pre-election rate. More than 13,000 domestic partnerships now exist in the state, and we're still waiting for the catastrophic impacts predicted by the alarmists.
As Laird is such an obviously lying lowlife, (Because, of course, NO ONE predicted a "crisis would erupt on Thursday") that's what lends itself to my belief that it was that scummy little worm who attacked us with his cowardly keyboard.

Like the loss of our freedoms, social engineering doesn't take place over night like this blithering idiot infers. The steps are incremental. Allowing "opposite-sex senior couples" to registers as anything is as blatant a form of discrimination as anything that asswipe ever whined about. But his utterly rank hypocrisy keeps him from saying anything about THAT.

So, we mark this up as yet another blow against this steaming pile of crap's legitimacy as any force in our community.

Let me re-iterate: I will never buy this disgusting pile of dung.... EVER... as long as that scumbag is employed there.

Yes, the people of this state have spoken. This is their will, for now, and because the tyranny of the majority has once again been visited upon the minority, we have to live with that.

But those of us wise enough to see the crass discrimination and bribery needed to pass this pile of crap at the polls do not need the judgement of cretins like Laird as a result.

To quote some comedian babbling about Rush, "I hope HIS kidneys fail." And soon.
.

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

The delusion of Tim "The Liar" Leavitt continues: exempt locals from paying for the bridge.

.
Every time this liar opens his mouth, it reinforces what a colossal mistake the people of Vancouver made in choosing him.

"Stupidity" doesn't begin to cover it. With a campaign built on a lie (That Leavitt opposes tolls) he now segues into sheer idiocy as he positions himself to avoid confronting the 65,000 people in Clark County that HIS efforts, along with those of fellow traveler Steve "Cold Hard Cash" Stuart (Who helped run Leavitt's campaign and who also has been a rabid bridge/loot rail supporter, even though he's screwing 65,000 people in this county with his tolls) will cause to pay $1300 per year to BEGIN with in extra tolls in addition to the Oregon income tax they ALREADY have to pay.

Apparently, this idiot didn't get the memo: YOU HAVE NO SAY. The City of Vancouver HAS NO SAY. This, in fact, is as moronic as that asinine, last minute idiocy of jacking up everyone's property taxes over a three county area to pay for this monstrosity.

The now-confirmed ignorance of the local GOP, who carried this guy's water like Gunga Din, EVEN THOUGH DEMOCRATS UP TO THE CLARK COUNTY DEMOCRAT CHAIR RAN HIS CAMPAIGN, just serves to reinforce my decision to leave their ranks long ago.

Leavitt's sad lack of testicular fortitude, wherein he' lacks the guts to oppose this thing WHEN tolls are REQUIRED and WHEN WE ALL HAVE TO PAY THEM (except, of course, for this massive waste of money's biggest cheerleaders... who, oddly, won't be commuting to Portland and PAYING the toll every day) refuses to oppose this unbelievably criminal waste of money under any circumstances.

This blithering idiot doesn't get it. He doesn't understand that first, HE HAS NO SAY, and the ONLY issue is this: does he SUPPORT this criminal waste of money? OR does he have the balls to oppose it?

He doesn't understand that THERE IS NO MONEY AT THE FED TO PAY FOR THIS. He doesn't understand that WE DON'T WANT THIS GARBAGE HEAP. THAT BUILDING THIS CRAP PILE WILL DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DECREASE CONGESTION OR INCREASE FREIGHT MOBILITY, AND THAT THE ENTIRE REASON FOR THE STEAMING PILE IS TO GET LOOT RAIL INTO CLARK COUNTY.

Good God. How the people of Vancouver generally and the right wing particularly could support such a moron is simply beyond my comprehension.

Even the idiots that supported this lying scumbag who now know they were hosed STILL support him... just like he was counting on. Why SHOULD he tell the truth, when he knows the group of cretins supporting him will continue to do so, even AFTER they figure out what a lying little worm he is.

Next, this scumbag will be demanding a set of teleprompters, just like his hero Obama. Won't THAT waste of money look good?
.

Monday, November 23, 2009

Comparisons between Tim "The Liar" Leavitt and Barack "The Empty Suit" Obama. Could a teleprompter be next?

.
The first one is obvious. They agree on everything, which is why the The Liar was an early endorser of The Empty Suit. I'm sure the fringe-right whack jobs with their situational ethics who signed on to a campaign run by local democrats (including the county democrat chair) are thrilled!

And how well THAT vision has worked! What a spectacular failure The Empty Suit has been, out-Cartering even the most hopeless moron to ever sit in the White House!

The second one is equally obvious. Both The Liar and The Empty Suit are consummate liars.

The list of Obama's outright lies dwarfs even his massive and false exaggerations.

With The Liar, the moment he started lying about his support of tolling the bridges (and he does support tolling BOTH of the bridges) as a way to replace (no matter how unnecessarily) the I-5 Bridge so he and his fellow henchmen can bring loot rail into the first few feet of Vancouver; he totally became Obama's shadow.

And his last second, late surprise package of trying to force everyone alive in a 3 county area to pay for a bridge and light rail we don't need by raising ALL of our property taxes.... why, that was the master stroke! It's the same thing as the moron in the White House scamming us all in health care!

The only thing missing from the package, besides a Klingon princess wife, is a teleprompter or two.

But The Liar couldn't be THAT stupid, could he? I mean, then I'd change his dwarfish little name to TelePrompter Timmy... and wouldn't THAT be rich?
.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Will the Columbian's idiocy ever end? In our view, Nov. 16: Pro Baseball? Here?

.
Among the many moronic plans this scumbag newspaper has for our community besides the economic black hole and massive waste of an unneeded and unwanted multi-billion bridge-replacement with loot rail, we can now add the stupidity of an unneeded and unwanted baseball stadium... at taxpayer expense, of course.

Here's the moronic money quote:

... There are three ways to view the notion of pro baseball coming to Vancouver:

No. Period.

Only if no public money is used.

Perhaps with public funding, but only if a powerful economic benefit is accurately projected.

We like the third view, accompanied by a believe-it-when-we-see-it caveat.
Of course these idiots would like the third view. If you demand that we waste billions, what's a few hundred million more wasted on a baseball stadium for a multi-millionaire in comparison?

But you know what? The money I would use to go see these baseball games and build this clown his stadium at public expense?

Well, THAT money is going into the $1300 per year in tolls these idiots want ME to pay, even though THEY won't.

And naturally these numskulls "like" the idea of building unneeded and unnecessary crap like a baseball stadium with public money; what projects have they slammed lately if they're built with public money and make Vancouver (the community with the second-largest inferiority complex on the west coast (Behind Portland)) look good?

"Powerful economic benefit is accurately projected?"

In a paper where figures don't lie, but liars figure: a paper where they've actually convinced themselves that the $4 billion or so they want to spend of OUR money for loot rail actually makes sense... a paper that stupidly and wrongly believed that a tax-subsidized Pollard Hilton was a GOOD idea, there are precisely ZERO numbers they won't believe if they add up the way this despicable rag wants them to.

Repeated lies about loot rail ridership projections. Repeated lies about the COSTS of loot rail. (A brief review of Sound Transit would show to anyone willing to read what lies can do) repeated lies about the economic impacts of the Porkulus, repeated lies about unemployment ceilings.... all without peep one from our local rag.... because, after all, they SUPPORT loot rail and they ENDORSED the Main Liar responsible for burying us in debt, so they wouldn't want to be held accountable for their stupidity... would they?

It appears to me that this rag WANTS this guy to throw some lies out there, so this stain on journalism can embrace them like it has so many others.

Naturally, like those morons backing the megacasino, those shilling for a baseball stadium paid for by a group of grateful taxpayers will assure us that the "investment" in question, precisely like the moronic Hilton, will solve every economic problem known to man. Of course, when none of the projections are met and we have to bleed MORE taxpayer dollars into this operation (see the Clark County Amphitheater) proving how bad this rag's "judgment" (using the term loosely) truly is when it comes to their view of "what's best for us."

Our waste of wood pulp has made the assignment to the idiots that want to stiff US with the tab for this idea: make up a set of numbers that WE think will make sense, and you'll get our powerful backing, millions of dollars worth of free publicity, and no end to the lies, exaggerations and distortions of anything even remotely resembling the truth... just like we did when we cheerleaded the lawsuit against the citizens to shut them up about downtown redevelopment; just like we do with any area democrat running for office; and just like we are doing in our effort to ram an unneeded and unwanted waste of billions of dollars down the throats of the taxpayers without asking them.

All you have to do is "lie" up some numbers, and, by golly, there we are.

There is no end to this rag's stupidity.
.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Brian Baird: Coward (XXXIV) here's the blurb from other sources since the Columbian lacked the balls to post it.

Baird has "no comment?"

The cowardly, lying little scumbag couldn't SHUT UP when he was using it as an excuse to avoid facing us.

Originally published Wednesday, November 11, 2009 at 8:42 AM in the Seattle Times

The Seattle Times

Local News

Comments (0) E-mail E-mail article Print Print view Share Share

FBI no longer investigating threat to Rep. Baird

The FBI is no longer investigating a threat against Rep. Brian Baird.

The Associated Press

VANCOUVER, Wash. —

The FBI is no longer investigating a threat against Rep. Brian Baird.

A spokeswoman for the agency, Lindsay Godwin, told The Vancouver Columbian that agents did not feel a phone message left at Baird's D.C. office was serious. She said Tuesday the FBI has closed its case.

On Monday, Capitol Police told The Columbian the FBI was handling the investigation.

Baird's spokeswoman, Kelly Love, says he has no comment.

During the health care debate in August the Vancouver Democrat said on MSNBC that the disruptions at town hall meetings reminded him of the atmosphere that led to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

Four days later someone left the message that there was a Ryder truck with his name on it.

---

Information from: The Columbian, http://www.columbian.com

_________________________________


Of course, he also refered to those of us smart enough to oppose the empty suits plan to screw up our country as Nazis and Brown Shirts... but this article doesn't seem to mention that.

.