WARNING: Offensive violence and pictures - Cincinnati city councilor proves she is unfit for elective office.

In yet another portrait of leftist hate and racial bigotry, A Cincinnati city councilor has proven she is unfit for elective office.

Imagine a role-reversal here. Imagine Cincinnati City Councilmember Victoria Parks was the victim. Imagine her attackers being a gang of white thugs.

Imagine if any white elected official of any major elected position... even a Donald Trump... came out and said that Parks had "begged for that beat down."

Riots would have overtaken the entire country, not that leftists and racists need an excuse to riot, burn, loot, murder and rob.

This is a video of the horrific attack on a couple who are white. Nearly beaten to death while cell phones recorded it but no one intervened.

Because... 2025. Because racism. Because savagery. Because entitlement. Because inculcated racist animus. Because blacks killing each other or whites is merely an accepted major part of life in the United States today.

Plainly, the Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett disease is not just a localized case. Victoria Parks is infested with the same variety of hatred Crockett shows on a daily basis.

A total and complete breakdown of the dregs of black society.

One can only wonder what Parks' thoughts might be, her despicable racist bigotry aside, if someone, or some group of someones who happen to be Caucasian, treated her the way she suggests Holly, the woman in this beat down, deserved to be treated?

Like all leftists, she runs on hatred. While I don't wish any such injury on anyone for any reason, it is clear she's unfit for public office.

WARNING: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS VIOLENCE AND RACISM THAT IS OFFENSIVE.

The subtle bigotry of Reid's Expectations.

.
We are cursed with two grade-A Prime bigots running the Senate.

First, we have the Number 2, Dick "Yeah, I said our troops are Nazi's... what about it?" Durbin and Harry "I forgot that DEMOCRATS are the slavery party" Reid.

Yesterday's abysmal performance in support of the fringe-left's socialized medicine scam was a sickening reminder of what people can do TO our country, instead of FOR our country.

When control of the Legislative Branch reverts to the GOP in a year or so, and the scum doing this to us are shut out of all the meetings required to undo their massive damage... what will they do then?

Where to begin? With a straight face (okay, an undertaker’s face) Reid asserts three outrageous falsehoods:

1) Republicans supported slavery.
2) Republicans opposed women’s suffrage.
3) Republicans opposed the Civil Rights Act.

The first is too idiotic to refute. Perhaps Sen. Reid (D-Hinky Land Deals) has forgotten that Abolition was the cause upon which the Republican Party was founded, and that the first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, is known today as the Great Emancipator. Clearly, the “world’s greatest deliberative body” has a moron for a majority leader. But wait – there’s more!

Michael Walsh over at Big Government has much more. But if I was a leftist today, I'd be hanging my head in shame at the scum calling the shots.
.

More Laird idiocy on his specialty: leftist bigotry.

.
The editorial page editor of our local paper is a fringe leftist nutjob.

This clown is both incapable of original thought, fairness or objectivity. He has been fully immersed in shilling for the agenda of that empty-suited, Anti-American racist bigot in the White House, lying, along with him, about everything having anything to do with Obama's destruction of this country.

I have blown so many holes through this moron's lies that it's got to be hard for him to drink coffee because of all the leaks.

His latest spew is completely in keeping with the nazi bigotry exhibited by the left and the leading lights of the minority victims such as Al "Tawana Brawley" Sharpton and other multi-millionaires who made a fortune on their victimhood.

Our local utter leftist moron squeals like a piggy when he says "Limbaugh 'victimized' by capitalism." That's just one of his many lies.

Here, clearly, is an example where Limbaugh was, in fact, 'victimized' by lying, fringe left scum both within and without the media... many of whom now, after the deed was done, are "apologizing" for failing to do what this despicable rag fails to do whenever it suits them: and that is, verify the information they've recieved by checking out the source.

"Capitalism's" roll WILL be central to this issue when, hopefully, Rush takes each and every one of these lying scum, including the entirety of the NFL, to court and sues their collective asses off.

But that's the only place where capitalism is involvedf in this matter. The issue here is the crushing of an individual's financial plans in the form of a desire to become a minority ownership position in arguably the worst team in professional football, the St. Louis Rams.

The issue here is the "why" of it.

The lying scumbag running the NFL, Roger Goodell, claims that the NFL has "high standards."

The owner for the "Leaving Baltimore in the middle of the night because we're cowards" Indianapolis Colts says that, in effect, Rush is a racist and divisive.

So... Rush is, pardon the expression, blackballed not because he's killed someone; not because he's beaten his girlfriend; not because he's assaulted anyone; not because he refuses to follow the NFL's "substance abuse policies". It's not for running a dog fighting ring. It's not for stealing another teams signals. No... it's not for any of those reasons... reasons that failed to cause any of the recently passed practitioners of these activities to be kicked out of football.

Instead, it's for engaging in the very thing THIS idiot does every time his column of bovine feces is printed.

It's because Rush says words and has ideas that these people don't "like."

Odd, isn't it, how one of our most cherished freedoms only applies to leftists... and not to anyone else.

This is not and never has been about "having sympathy" for Rush. Instead, it's about having contempt for leftist scumbags like Laird who are so blinded by their own peculiar bias that when the rights of one are crushed, they fail to grasp that the crushing, in this instance, happened to be someone else.

So, Laird... how would you feel if your job was ended because of the crap in your columns?

Obviously, that'll never happen, since you've been taking a dump on this community since you arrived here, with apparent impunity.

But what if it did, moron? You've regaled us with bigotry, lies, distortion and exaggeration for years.

What if it cost YOU a job, a purchase, a club membership?

Would that be all hunky dory with you, idiot?

Would you want us to have "sympathy" for someone who makes Rush look like a Cub Scout when it comes to bigotry and divisiveness?

Would YOU whine and snivel?

Of course you would.

It's you and toilet scum like you that have caused me to boycott the NFL for the rest of my life. So, the one thing that the National Football League HAS done, with the help of leftist scuzballs like you, is to show their true colors. And that made the decision easy.

I sincerely hope and pray that you will be faced with the same situation. I sincerely hope that you will be humiliated and either lose a job or be disqualified from one... not because of anything you've DONE, but because of what you've said and what you think.

I really, really, REALLY hope that happens to you, and soon.
.

HATERS DENIED! Referendum 71, The "end special rights for gays" initiative, makes the ballot!

.
Earlier, I talked about the left's and the gay's abhorrence of democracy and fear of the will of the people.

A few hours ago, Referendum 71, a referendum to roll back the special rights granted people merely because of their lifestyle choices by a socially leftist legislature, qualified for the ballot.

Gays and their supporters put all of their faith into working hard to deny the people of this state the RIGHT to determine this issue.

That is much like the local politicians and bureaucrats who insist on keeping the people from having a direct say in the monstrosity that is the I-5 Bridge and Loot Rail waste of billions. It's that same arrogance, that same"our judgement is superior to yours" crap pushed by our local paper.

The fear of the will of the people is palpable among the leftists. They long for a Stalinist model with that empty-suited, anti-American racist bigot and his cult of personality in charge.

Now, we'll stand back and watch the leftists and gays hurl accusations of bigotry, precisely like they hurl accusations of racism against anyone smart enough to object to Obama's socialist policies.

I have no idea how this is going to turn out. But the more gays and their allies hurl these allegations of "Nazi" and "Brown Shirt," the more likely the outcome will be the same for them as it is the scumbag representing the 3rd District in Congress.

And they won't like that at all.

The bigotry of Sotomayer: Defense of the Indefensible: Update - dems reduced to lying about this issue.

FACT CHECK: Don't quote Sotomayor on that, Senator

WASHINGTON (AP) - In endorsing Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy did some creative rewriting of history. And he put quote marks around it.

Trying to head off criticism of a controversial comment, Leahy misquoted Sotomayor's own words in kicking off the second day of her confirmation hearings.

Sotomayor's public comments are as much a part of the hearings as her lengthy judicial record. Here's a look at some of the claims made Tuesday about those comments, and the facts.

___

LEAHY SAID: "You said that, quote, you 'would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would reach wise decisions.'"

THE FACTS: If that's all Sotomayor said, the quote would barely have mattered to opponents of her nomination. The actual quote, delivered in a 2001 speech to law students at the University of California at Berkeley, was: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

Leahy's revision dropped the controversial part of the phrase, the part that has attracted charges of reverse racism.

Sotomayor said her words have been misunderstood. She said she intended to tell students that their experiences would enrich the legal system. But she softened her language Tuesday, say that no ethnic, racial or gender group has an advantage in judging.

_________

So... does any reader here believe this revisionst history wasn't planned?

Leahy is a scumbag. Always has been. That he's reduced to lying to attempt, no matter how badly, to cover up Sotomayer's bigotry speaks for itself.

That said, with the recent set up and scamming of the not-terribly-important hispanic vote by Tim Leavitt, racism of all kinds has reared it's ugly head.

For many, they're convinced that only those of us light-complected (that is, "white") can be racist. The absurdity of such a claim is made clear by the racist occupying the White House.

A bigot has been described as a pejorative term to describe a person who is obstinately devoted to prejudices, especially when these views are either challenged, or proven to be false or not universally applicable or acceptable.

This, of course, leads us to yet another in the series of disastrous, racist and incompetent personnel choices our president has made for his Administration.

There are certain aspects of this moronic appointment that are universally accepted. One is, perhaps, the most infamous phrase ever uttered by any sitting judge, anywhere.

I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.

Were I questioning her, I would ask this:

"So, Judge Sotomayer, tell us... about that "wise Latina woman" (Is there some other kind of Latina?) speech... is the reverse also true?

Are there situations where a white male with the richness of HIS experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina woman who hasn't lived that life?"

"And what might those situations be?"

That question will never be asked of this woman, because the leftists running the show believe they're making political points by appointing such a racist to the highest court in the land.

"Racist?"

Yes, racist. As racist as Bull Connor and his German Sheppards. I don't even need to explore what would not be happening to a white male nominee had he said such a thing... and the double standard is despicable.

Racism is racism. The purveyors of racism are not determined by any particular characteristic. There are black, brown, white, male and female racists. Sotomayer, whether she acknowledges it or not... whether she even knows it or not, is one of them.

She is a self-admitted product of the "affirmative action" state. She has reached her various levels of incompetence not because of any judicial stardom, but because she was the token hispanic.

And THIS is who we want sitting on the highest court in the land? THIS is the best the empty suit in the White House could do?

Seriously?

Suddenly, Harriet Miers looks like a brilliant choice in comparison. And the people of this country will be made to suffer for it.
.

The bigotry of gay marriage supporters is hard to fathom.

.
The latest dust up involved trashing President Obama for his pro-marriage views in a way I didn't think was possible. Given how rabid the support of the fringe left was for the empty suit, it's hard to believe they could turn on him this way.

Greg Gutfeld of the Daily Gut lays it all out in his Gregalogue: The Uncommon Bravery of Guliana Rancic.

MONDAY'S GREGALOGUE: THE UNCOMMON BRAVERY OF GULIANA RANCIC

So, it's official: Barack Obama is a bigot.

In a brave stance not seen since the beginning of time, a number of celebrities, journalists and bloggers have called President Obama out on his ignorant, narrow-minded views toward gay marriage.

First, it was renegade blogger Perez Hilton who, after noting Obama`s Christian beliefs, called our President a "stupid bitch." Shortly after that, pageant judge Alicia Jacobs rose up and said she would not have voted for Obama because of his intolerant and freakish views. Meanwhile, outspoken blogs like Queerty and Gawker have started using the b-word against Barack, calling him an out and out bigot. And then – out of nowhere – the Miss California USA pageant has urged Obama to apologize to the gay community! Finally - in possibly the bravest action of all, hard-hitting E News anchor Guliana Rancic tweeted that President Obama is an ignorant disgrace.

This is amazing stuff, people. By coming out against the President over his negative views on gay marriage, these folks are putting their livelihoods at risk.

Okay, they really haven`t actually said Obama by name. Instead, they focused their wrath on Carrie Prejean, the Miss USA contestant who views about gay marriage are entirely the same as President Obama`s. But if Prejean is a bigot for her views, and Obama holds the same views, then clearly Obama is a bigot too.

If A = B, and B = C, then A= C. I learned that when I was ten.

Of course, you won`t hear any of this from those brave voices I mentioned above. I guess views about gay marriage matter if you`re in a beauty pageant, but not if you`re in the White House. Or maybe these folks hold different standards for blonde girls than they do for black dudes.

Meaning, they lower the bar for Obama. Which you could call racist. After all, lowering expectations for someone because of who they are really is the definition of bigotry.

But I prefer not to think that way. Fact is, people like Rancic, Jacobs and Perez are heroes. They know how much tougher it is to beat up on a white Christian chick, than go after the most popular president since Morgan Freeman in "Deep Impact."

For that they deserve a pie of some kind.