Wednesday, July 02, 2014

Bully Loserham: "Constitution? We don't need no stinking Constitution!"

First, like most leftists, she has no clue as to what the decision... or the issues... are about.

Second, this was a decision based on the majority of the court protecting the rights enumerated under the First Amendment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]
Fairly straight forward, but ultimately meaningless to Bully and her ilk.

As a commenter pointed out below this idiocy:
In all fairness, Hobby Lobby still provides coverage for 16 other birth control methods that do not include terminating a pregnancy. They pay quite a bit higher than comparable businesses, and have extremely high employee satisfaction; so despite the bad press, they are doing something right.
Clearly, Bully is one of those "3rd trimester, execute in the womb" types who don't believe the document that establishes the very foundation of government in this country means anything.

But then, when it comes to the leftist agenda, when have any of them actually put the Constitution first?

I also notice that Bully didn't seem to have much to say about the SEIU smack down decision.  Wonder why?

1 comment:

Martin Hash said...

I was totally against the FORCED private insurance aspect of Obamacare because I thought it was unconstitutional (as well as being stupid). Well, I bow to the Supreme Court, FORCED private insurance is not unconstitutional - that only leaves being stupid.

I support socialized medicine for lots of reasons. One of which is that this kind of shit wouldn't even come up.