The REAL Steve "Easy Money" Stuart's arrogance and hypocrisy seeps through:

.
I almost upchucked on my keyboard when I read the sewage that spewed from Steve"I Can Be Bought" Stuart over his incredibly lucky victory in the election:

“I don’t think you build a movement by trying to buy elections and deceive voters,” Stuart said; “by recruiting, bankrolling and propping up my opponent; by handing out checks to a bunch of others and dumping a bunch of his money into a campaign to deceive voters.”

Good God. Where to start.

Without 4 $25,000 checks from David Barnett, there never would have been a Commissioner Stuart to begin with.

So, to a corrupt slimeball like Stuart, "buying an election" is swell... when he's the one being bought.

And, of course, Easy Money was the brains behind the most deceptive campaign in local political history. Stuart was the guiding force behind Tim "The Liar" Leavitt's mayoral campaign, one of the slimiest frauds ever perpetrated by a politician... and it was Stuart's doing, start to finish.

So, a slimebag like Stuart complains about some other campaign being "deceiving?"

So clearly, to a total scumbag like Stuart, "bankrolling and propping" someone up is perfectly fine, as long as he, Stuart, is the one benefiting.

And does that mean that Easy Money won't be accepting any more money from David Nierenberg? You know, the leftist behind 10's of thousands given to Stuart to buy HIM and prop HIM up?

Or is that just another example of the typical leftist hypocrisy that Stuart's becoming increasingly known for?

And, of course, the chief fringe-left nuttberger, democrat chair Dena Horton, was also up to HER bangs in The Liar's campaign.

Actually, I have a simple solution to the bridge issue. I've advocated it for years, my brother in law, alleged Republican Marc Boldt lied to my face about it, and it's simplicity in itself.

Hold a vote on the project.

Let us decide.

I mean, after all, if Horton really IS hearing the Who, then it shouldn't have any problem passing.... should it?

Nope. Bridger/Looters have no intention of letting the people speak on this issues. So when a scuzball like Horton shoots off her mouth, all I can do is point out her involvement in the despicable Liar Leavitt campaign and let that speak for itself.

As for Madore, addressing these issues are easy:

1. Stop fooling yourself. The notolls.com campaign was a disaster... which, come to think of it, I TOLD you it would be.

2. Get someone to run the show who knows what they're doing. Clearly, you are not possessed with such an individual.

3. Get the commuters organized. Each of them have 1300 reasons to pay attention to you and put a stop to this nonsense.

4. Pick A TARGET, and TAKE THEM OUT.

5. Stop doing interviews with the Columbian. They are NOT your friend, and all this article allowed was yet another opportunity to beat the hell out of you in their typically biased way; while there was no mention from any candidate or official who supported your actions or your goal... as if they didn't exist.

Do you suppose your campaign would have been met with such yawning indifference by these slimeballs if you had taken Stuart out?

Otherwise... well, otherwise, just knock this stuff off and give the money away to a charity. Because in this campaign you were firing BB's at an elephant instead of a cannon at a gnat.
.