Thursday, October 24, 2013

Wonder if Jamie Herrera thinks selling us out was such a great idea now.


“Like it or not," the Princess of the press release babbled, "the White House and Senate have blocked House efforts to address the issues with the Affordable Care Act. (You know... what the rest of the planet calls "Obamacare?") Nothing positive will be achieved by prolonging the shutdown any longer, for crossing the debt limit threshold.  It’s time for my colleagues to face reality.”

I wonder how this empty suit feels about this now.  But it's hard to say, because like so many other of the major issues confronting us today, she's keeping her pie hole shut.

Sen. Ted Cruz from Texas, was, of course, correct.  Our fringe left wing nut, Jamie Herrera, was wrong.

And is wrong.

The entirety of Obamacare has shown itself to be an unmitigated disaster, from start to finish.  This “we have to pass the bill to see what’s in it,” nonsense doesn’t cut it.

On one hand, the simple idiot claims she “still opposes Pres. Barack Obama’s health care reforms.”
And then, on the other, she proceeds to cave... Just like the rest of the democrats in enabling it to engage in this sorry implementation.

And that’s the reality that she faces...  Along with the rest of the sellouts in the Washington state delegation.

In fact, Jamie Herrera is the single biggest reason I no longer count myself as being a Republican… Since because of her, I’m ashamed to call myself one.

Stunningly enough, I agree with Obama: we should have an immigration bill by the end of the year…

(Dictated by Dragon Naturally Speaking 12.5)

Just not the one he thinks.

This is a very hot issue for the Republicans… One the GOP cannot win.

The GOP can do what they did with the vast majority of other government issues and spending bills and cave to Obama, in which case the GOP will take the blame for having gone this long without caving to Obama; or the GOP can do what needs to be done and accept nothing less than the proposals below.

Since the GOP can't win, then what say they try something increasingly bizarre... like sticking to the principle that if you're here, or going to come here illegally... we don't reward you for that?

The fringe left Obama plan will be just as disastrous as Reagan’s amnesty.  For history buffs, we were assured back in the day that giving all the illegals that were here violating our laws amnesty would absolutely solve this problem.

How did that work out for us?

There are many, many ways that are much simpler, easier, and cheaper.

First and foremost, we have to understand that no matter what the GOP agrees to here, it’s not going to make any difference when it comes to the issue of illegal aliens.  No matter what laws are passed, no matter what accommodation is made, we will continue to have millions of illegals within this country that will not do what needs to be done to be legal.  That’s a given.  We know this, because after the last amnesty, millions around this country then still did not go forward and do what needed to be done to become legal.

This issue is rarely if ever brought up, but it’s a fact.  So now that we’ve established that, what can happen this time?

The same thing.

And it’s going to happen because we will not take the steps that we need to take to take care of the problem.

The steps are relatively easy, easy to understand, easy to implement.

All of the steps in question have to be done in such a way so that the United States ceases being the destination resort for illegal aliens.  This means doing some relatively straightforward yet simple and undeniably unpleasant actions that will actually serve to put an end to this problem.  The issue of illegal aliens will not stop being a problem because we go through charade of legalizing it.

Like so many other problems we face; the United States, as well as the various states and communities within our country, lack the will needed to address these issues… We somehow seem to believe that by playing pattycake with those would violate our laws we are somehow going to resolve the problem.

Technically, you could make murder legal it the states had the will.  Would making murder legal in the eyes of the law make it go away as a problem?

Of course not.  So what we have here is a president who’s bent on making this problem disappear, by changing a few words in our laws.  In a more sober moment, the president would acknowledge that no matter what we do with the law, it will not resolve the problem.…  If the laws are not written to end the incentive for illegal aliens to come here in the first place.

He’s unconcerned about the billions of additional dollars he would waste on these illegals; he’s completely shown a disregard for the impacts on our job market by these illegals; in short, he cares more about the illegals, it would seem, than the American people themselves.  Who knew?  I always thought it was Americans that were supposed to be his primary concern.

Now, when the illegal aliens get caught, or arrive at the border, they are so knowledgeable about the system, that they can game it indefinitely.  They’ll just asked for amnesty.  And as a result, we let them go, until they get a hearing… If they bother to show up.

Why should they avoid coming here when they know that were going to be waiting for them with open arms and social programs and in food stamps and housing and free medical care….  All it little to no cost to them.

As I’ve already pointed out, the solutions to these problems are relatively simple.

First and foremost: no illegal alien, no person of any variety who cannot prove their legal status, should be allowed to receive any city, state or federal benefit of any kind.

That’s right: no food stamps, no medical, no shelter, no nothing.  And those who distribute these benefits, would be required by law to ascertain citizenship status before one dime moved.  Those whining about how their job as a law enforcement, can always feel free to quit and go work at McDonald’s were nobody will care.  But if they are representatives of the government or of any of the governments within this country there number one job is to obey the law.  And if that makes them uncomfortable?

Tough noogies: they can feel free to quit.

That includes schooling for illegal alien children.  That includes reduced tuition for illegal alien college students.  That includes taking it a step further by ending the practice of putting out of state or out of country students to the head of the line when it comes to getting seats in our colleges and universities.  This means that those attending are schools in the United States would have to prove their citizenship status.  And that means like it or not (and I really don’t give a damn if they like it or not) that the schools would be required to find proof of citizenship, or deny entry of students into their school.

Second: make it illegal for illegal aliens to own any property.  That means that those who are here illegally, when they earn a living illegally, and buy things, the owner (and that would include de facto owners) discovered to be an illegal alien, would have their assets treated the same as if an American citizen was discovered to be a drug dealer, and they should suffer forfeiture as a result.

Third: get rid of this idiocy of illegal aliens having driver’s licenses.

Fourth: denying anyone who is or who has ever been an illegal alien the opportunity to find a “pathway to citizenship.”

Fifth: make anyone who hires or makes money in any way off of the illegal alien subject to the same laws as drug dealers: that is, if they hire illegal aliens to work for them or utilize them in some other capacity, they become subject to the same forfeiture laws as a drug dealer.  Personally, I believe that this would make it much less likely that illegal aliens would be employed in the United States, if those doing the employing ran the risk of losing everything.

At this point, some are no doubt thinking, that this requires some sort of federal ID card.  I don’t have a problem with that.  I served in countries that have federal ID cards, most notably six years in Germany, where all citizens, 16 and over are required to have this ID known as a “personalauswies.” (Personal aus vice) These laws are relatively straightforward, easy to understand, lack a lot of technical elements, and should be broadcast far and ride wide around the world.

Some out there would object to such an idea.  Those who object the strongest.  However, have yet to come up with an idea that would supersede this in such a way that it would dramatically impact are a illegal alien population.  This does not represent any kind of a sacrifice to me, my driver’s license has served essentially the same function for a long time.  But it would put an end to many issues concerning welfare fraud, voter fraud, and of course it illegal alien issues.

Now some reading this would break their own job is screaming that I’m a xenophobe.

Nothing could be further from the truth; I was once married to someone who was born outside this country, but who went through the legal process of becoming a US citizen.

And that’s what I advocate.

I would be the first to agree that our current system of enabling legal immigration is as screwed up as the VA claims situation.

So for my purposes, I’m fully in favor of immigration reform… But not the immigration reform the fringe left wants… the immigration reform that they see as a way to keep themselves in power forever.

My immigration reform plan would have the five elements listed above, as well as an actual overhaul and expansion of our current bureaucracy to ensure that requests for legal immigration are handled expeditiously and legally, so that they meet the requirements of law currently in place, but typically ignored by a government that really doesn’t give a damn about the letter of the law, except when it suits them.

And if the criteria cannot be met?  Then you cannot come into this country.

Folks, this isn't rocket science; the fringe leftists amongst us are open border advocates that really don’t care about issues like border security and economics of having millions of the illegals in our country, taking the jobs away from citizens.  That makes them no nevermind because they see each and every one of them is a potential Democrat voter and that, ladies and gentlemen, is all they give a damn about.

My concerns extend far beyond that.  My concerns are related to our security, and our economy.  Not to mention the fact that frankly, I am sick of billions of our scarce tax dollars going to fund the illegal alien resort factory that the United States of America has sadly become.

Even more Obama idiocy.



Memo to the ODOT director Matthew Garrett: when lying liars lie.

With a decade-long trail of lies, exaggeration, a complete lack of transparency, and a total disregard for public input by CRC policy, one wonders: how many more lies can these clowns come up with?

One of the longer-lasting lies was the so-called September 30 deadline.  We were bombarded by utter nonsense by the pro-CRC scammers, who insisted on lying to us about the impacts of failing to secure federal dollars by September 30.  Had they been telling the truth, then this project would of been buried for over a month and we wouldn’t even be talking about it.  So once again, they’ve lied to us.  And now to get a keep on lying, until they get what they want...  No matter what we want.

Of course at this point, the federal money for this project is long since been distributed.  In short, there is no federal money.

So when another one of these morons comes along, and Garrett, I’m talking to you; and tells us, “Oregon must act now to keep CRC on track,” that has all the credibility of Barack Obama raping us with Obamacare: and how’s that working out for them?

In case Garrett and the rest of the morons schilling this scam haven’t noticed, this project is not on track.  It’s essentially been off track… ever since Tim Probst lost in the last election.  That tells me the Garrett isn’t paying attention.

Garrett’ s babble has several problems with it; not the least of which is that as democrat Oregon Senate President Peter Courtney has already stated, there will be no special session.  So when Garrett finally gets that memo will his head explode? 

I might remind Garrett that he is not capable of forcing the Senate to do anything, in either Oregon or Washington.  The problems that he has with trying to force this hand, include two major issues: first and foremost, the people of Clark County do not want this ripoff scam.  Secondary to that, the state Senate of Washington will never support this and I know damned well will do whatever it takes to stop this scam.

We’re not only a nation of laws, we’re a state of laws, and the idea that some clowns can get together and get’s snockard and come up with a plan to ram this crap down our throats does not mean it’s ever going to see the light of day.

No state wants to be dictated to by any other state.  You can bet that if Washington was attempting to ram a third bridge down Oregon’s throat they’d be bitching like cut cats.  There’s been no effort to compromise on Oregon side, or that any other CRC scammer side.  And until an effort to compromise, realistic compromise, which includes raising the bridge height and stripping light rail off of it, is put on the table… Then this scam is D.O.A.

Soon, the people of Clark County will go to the one indisputable poll of all polls that are available: the voting box.  No action of any kind needs to be taken until after the people of Clark County of spoken.  And if we reject this… as I expect that we will reject this massive theft and extortion of billions of dollars and 40 years of yoking the people to Oregon’s fetish for light rail… Then that is what they will have to do.

And no amount of kicking this dead horse, particularly by a bureaucrat like the ODOT director, is going whip it back in to life.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Ron Onslow is feelin' it. (Updated)

First, that a low-life like Mike Briggs supports Onslow would be reason enough to oppose him, given that Briggs himself has no integrity and has been a butt-boy for the CRC Scam from the beginning.

That said, Onslow sold out the people of not only Ridgefield but the entirety of SW Washington when he voted to enable the unconstitutional act of allowing full control of eminent domain to go to TriMet without a hearing or public review.

Nothing that he's written here excuses that, and he's still not fit to be elected dog-catcher.
There seems to be much confusion regarding a vote that I made as representative of the C-Tran board.
A little history:  Jim Irish, mayor of LaCenter, is our usual representative on the C-Tran board. I am the alternate. We always communicate before a meeting. Both Ridgefield and LaCenter Councils have voted to support the RTC (regional transportation commission) agenda.

Simply put, THE VOTE in question was:

IF the bridge is built, and
IF light rail is built, then

WHO would do the O & M (operations & maintenance) in Clark County?

I voted yes, for C-Tran to do that job. That yes vote was one of the majority votes. A choice that was turned down was for Tri-Met to run the O&M (because of state line issues). Other choices were 1) Vancouver, 2)a newly created government agency, or 3) do nothing.

The flyer opposing my vote says I voted “because of special interests”. I would like to reply that MY ONLY Special Interests are Ridgefield.  When I meet with potential companies looking at locating in Ridgefield, one of the concerns is that of transportation in the I-5 corridor and the interstate bridge.
My focus is Ridgefield, but we are part and parcel of Clark County as a whole. Example: We received funding for our new overpass and roundabouts because of our work and that of the RTC. The RTC works for the county and its cities as a whole.

I truly love Ridgefield and its citizens. I act on behalf of our city council which is comprised of wonderful, giving individuals. I support those presently running for council that are on the council: Don Stose, John Main and Sandra Day. I also ask that you vote for me. Please vote, it’s a terrific right.

Ron Onslow, Mayor, City of Ridgefield

Of course, the correct choice was "3) do nothing."

It's difficult to believe that Onslow is so ignorant that he actually believes this rip off would have any positive impact on congestion or freight mobility; and I believe he's flat out lying over what some unnamed "potential companies" (and what does the phrase "potential company" mean, anyway?  Does that mean they won't exist unless this moronic project goes through?) may have asked.

I, personally, could care less if he was subbing for CRC Buttboy Jim Irish: that's irrelevant.  Further, stupidity from a city council doesn't replace his individual judgement, which was to screw the people of his city, this county and this region of the state.

His vote was the deciding vote.  He could have gone the other way and delayed this until after the people voted... or delayed it until we at least had the ability to review the contract.

But noooooooo.... why wait, when you can screw the people right now?

Onslow should not only not be re-elected as Mayor, he shouldn't be elected dog catcher.

I urge those who can to vote for Tim Wilson.  He will fight to present the view of the people, and not the view of the CRC Scammers.

UPDATE:  David Madore nails Onslow's effort to scam out of his vote:

David Madore Debbie Nelson, thank you for posting Ron Onslow letter. I had not seen it before. He is the first to say why he voted for TriMet.

Allow me to refute it:

Point 1: 
Onslow violated the standing RTC policy that was adopted as a condition of approval of the CRC Locally Preferred Alternative. See the following policy on page 56 of the LPA that shows the RTC resolution that says “Any means chosen to finance operations of the HCT component of the CRC project shall be submitted to impacted C-TRAN voters for approval.” 
http://www.columbiarivercrossing.org/.../IRP/IRP_TabG.pdf

Point 2:
Both Jim Irish and Ron Onslow are not to represent themselves. They are to represent the citizens of their cities. The majority of the citizens in both cities rejected light rail funding in the 2012 General Election. Proposition One was “to fund the C-TRAN share of the maintenance and operations costs only of the Columbia River Crossing Project light rail extension between Expo Center and Clark Park & Ride and the local capital share and operations and maintenance costs of the Fourth Plain Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit project.” – page 11 of the voter pamphlet:
http://www.clark.wa.gov/...

Key word definitions:
Commitment: an agreement to do (or not to do) something in the future, an assurance of a future action, to give one’s word to fulfill a future obligation

Betray: to abandon a commitment, to forsake a promise, to prove faithless in obligations, to prove untrustworthy, to abandon an assurance