Sunday, October 26, 2014

Democratian butthurt over Stewart.

I just saw the title of the editorial: there's no point in reading it.

I'm waiting with baited breath for the editorial that asks "Who owns Stonier?"  Or the editorial "Who owns the democrats?"  Or another biggie, "Who owns Inslee?"

Back in the day when, for whatever the reason,  the rag cast Stonier aside with a:
 "....sings pitch-perfect the talking point serenades of the Washington Education Association, the teachers’ union. Stonier shows no inclination to force public employees to incur the same pay and benefits sacrifices that private-sector workers have suffered. Her big campaign advantages over Hash are party connections and political clout. She — and not the eccentric attorney/accountant/computer nerd/rich guy — is the darling of local Democrats."
...non-endorsement, words which, by the way, have proven themselves to be perfectly true, oddly enough, they didn't seem all that concerned with who owned her.

Now, of course, the left has dumped $430,000 into the Wilson-Stonier race... (The WEA alone has trucked in far over a quarter of a million.) over 4 times the amount identified as going for Stewart's independent expenditures, and I've got to ask: where's their concern over "who owns Stonier?" 

No where.

In fact, they don't even mention it because, well, when the democrats do it, "that's different."

That's the kind of fringe-left hypocrisy the democratian exhibits on a daily basis.

Fortunately for us all, the last thing the Columbian is, is the arbiter of anything "right" or "wrong."

I have to tell you: I don't mind all that much that the cancer on our community is examining the money going to Stewart under one condition: that they spend equal scrutiny on ALL candidates.

The special interests of the left dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars into Tim Probst's campaign last cycle, and all this despicable waste of wood pulp could do is complain that Don Benton said they were actually going to do that, and then go to bat for Probst when he lied about getting that kind of money... and then said absolutely nothing when, in fact, he DID get a quarter of a million (Like Benton said he was going to get) only to cover that up.

So, instead of even-handedness and fairness by placing ALL candidates under the same magnifying glass, all these scumbags could do is hammer Stewart for something that is absolutely NOT under her control.

I've got to tell you, if I HAD the money, I'd set up a PAC and dump a half million into to keep Pridemore or anything LIKE a lowlife Pridemore.Stuart clone out of elective office... no matter WHO the candidate running against him was or is.

Having a hypocrite charter supporter (Who, while a county commissioner, made no effort to implement any charter system like THIS scam since HE was in charge) as a county commissioner, a father of the CRC Scam who lied repeatedly about the project and then ignored repeated calls to allow us to vote on that scam is, frankly, nauseating. 

Focusing on what Madore is alleged to have done while ignoring what everyone on the left IS doing?

That's nothing more than Brancaccio's partisan hatred of Madore infecting everything he does.

It cements my support of Jeanne Stewart, who, unlike the scum she's running against and his proven corruption, is a woman of integrity who will be unsullied by the issue of money in this election.

Don't be fooled by these fringe-left slimeballs.

Vote Stewart.  I have.  Don't let another anti-Madore screed dissuade you from doing anything.

Leftist petulance is hardly a reason to do anything.  In this case, it's hardly a reason to vote for the Charter or against Stewart.

No comments: