.
And the winner is this particularly scummy effort that would have made Obama's hero Nazi-Propaganda Minister blush. You can skip the first minute of agaony and get right down to the chunk-blowing nonsensical garbage point of this video at about 1:07.
I owe all this to the Gut
.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
The bigotry of faux racist victims: "You can't vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man."
.
It's a shame that for the most part, the black community of the United States is led by racebaiters and scum like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.
One has to wonder: is equality their motivation? Or is it more a matter of dollars and cents?
After all, under any other circumstances, a lying little bitch like Al "Tawana Brawley makes a great ad for Glad Bags" Sharpton and a sleazeball like Jesse "Hymie Town - adultery is my middle name" Jackson wouldn't be allowed to run an elevator, let alone be given the national spotlight on demand.
I have frequently wondered why anyone would give a crap what either of these two scum think, see, want, desire or care about. Continued racist division, fostered by these two (among others) is a growth industry keeping them in expensive suits, first class restaurants and the national spotlight. Why is it in their best interests to actually strive to unify when working so hard to divide pays so well?
And for a scumbag to play the race card for anyone black and smart enough to vote against this moronic socialization of healthcare is part of the reason that I despise scum like this... and ANY race-based consideration of anything.
More:
.
It's a shame that for the most part, the black community of the United States is led by racebaiters and scum like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.
One has to wonder: is equality their motivation? Or is it more a matter of dollars and cents?
After all, under any other circumstances, a lying little bitch like Al "Tawana Brawley makes a great ad for Glad Bags" Sharpton and a sleazeball like Jesse "Hymie Town - adultery is my middle name" Jackson wouldn't be allowed to run an elevator, let alone be given the national spotlight on demand.
I have frequently wondered why anyone would give a crap what either of these two scum think, see, want, desire or care about. Continued racist division, fostered by these two (among others) is a growth industry keeping them in expensive suits, first class restaurants and the national spotlight. Why is it in their best interests to actually strive to unify when working so hard to divide pays so well?
And for a scumbag to play the race card for anyone black and smart enough to vote against this moronic socialization of healthcare is part of the reason that I despise scum like this... and ANY race-based consideration of anything.
Jesse Jackson: 'You can't vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man'
- 11/18/09 05:42 PM ET
The Rev. Jesse Jackson on Wednesday night criticized Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.) for voting against the Democrats’ signature healthcare bill.
“We even have blacks voting against the healthcare bill,” Jackson said at a reception Wednesday night. “You can’t vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man.”
Davis, who is running for governor, is the only black member of Congress from Alabama.
He is also the only member of the CBC to have voted against the healthcare bill earlier this month.
Davis referred to Jackson’s 1988 run for president in a statement, issued through his office, that said he would not engage Jackson on his criticism.
“One of the reasons that I like and admire Rev. Jesse Jackson is that 21 years ago he inspired the idea that a black politician would not be judged simply as a black leader,” Davis’s statement said. “The best way to honor Rev. Jackson’s legacy is to decline to engage in an argument with him that begins and ends with race.”
.
Since we already have a coward representing us in Congress, why would we want Jon Russell?
.
I have posted just under 40 times since August about the fake death threat fiascoes wherein our current Cowardman, Brian Baird, has shown a level of cowardice almost unfathomable in it's depth and breadth.
There is no doubt that Baird is a political dead man walking. The next general shapes up to be a bloodbath of 1994-esque proportions. That, of course, begs the question: why would we want to replace one coward with another?
Washougal City Councilman Jon Russell set local speed records in tossing now former Mayor Stacee Sellers under the nearest bus in his haste to avoid any responsibility for the credit card/$100,000 debacle... all the while, neglecting to mention that HE, PERSONALLY, was among the three member committee with personal oversight over the use of the city's credit cards.
Now, it's bad enough that he lacked the ability or interest to actually EXERCISE that oversight. And now, people are actually starting to ask: why hasn't Russell been held accountable for HIS failure to do HIS job in the midst of all of this?
Instead of taking responsibility for his actions, Russell engages in Obamaesque excuse making, shucking, jiving, ducking and running. And what's his explanation?
Why, it's this:
Good.
God.
I have never in my life read such a huge crock of self-serving cow manure in the entirety of the twenty-plus years I've been following politics.
Here, for the time-impaired, is the Cliff Notes version of why Russell thinks he bears no responsibility for his failure to act under these circumstances.
If our erstwhile Congressional wannabe lacked the testicles to take on a low-rent lowlife like Sellers....
.... what makes anyone believe for one second that he has what it takes to go up against Pelosi, Reid, or that empty-suited anti-American racist bigot running the show?
In short, why would we replace one coward, Baird; with another coward, Russell?
Do you think for one minute that *I* would have settled for being put off, ignored, intimidated?
Is this clown so helpless that he couldn't have written the county or state auditor's office, asking for assistance and an investigation LONG ago if he saw (but as it turns out, failed to act on) so many "red flags" he allegedly observed?
He almost clownishly mentions that
And then this laughable pap:
What the hell does THAT mean?
I was "unable to write and provide facts causing an investigation to the State Auditor's office." I was "unable to call a reporter." I was "unable, for that matter, to even call Lars Larsen."
There is a major difference between "unable," and "unwilling."
So, here we have it. When allegedly confronted by incompetence and illegality, what did our young, crusading, city councilman do?
Why, he did absolutely nothing.
Well DONE, Mr. Russell. My confidence in your incompetence increases by the second. And the sure knowledge that you share the trait first mastered by Baird; specifically, that you won't take responsibility for any of the many things you do wrong reinforces to me my decision to do everything I can to keep you out of any elective office that includes me.
"Restore 'trust'," Mr. Russell? The only thing your lack of character and integrity does to me is restore nausea.
.
I have posted just under 40 times since August about the fake death threat fiascoes wherein our current Cowardman, Brian Baird, has shown a level of cowardice almost unfathomable in it's depth and breadth.
There is no doubt that Baird is a political dead man walking. The next general shapes up to be a bloodbath of 1994-esque proportions. That, of course, begs the question: why would we want to replace one coward with another?
Washougal City Councilman Jon Russell set local speed records in tossing now former Mayor Stacee Sellers under the nearest bus in his haste to avoid any responsibility for the credit card/$100,000 debacle... all the while, neglecting to mention that HE, PERSONALLY, was among the three member committee with personal oversight over the use of the city's credit cards.
Now, it's bad enough that he lacked the ability or interest to actually EXERCISE that oversight. And now, people are actually starting to ask: why hasn't Russell been held accountable for HIS failure to do HIS job in the midst of all of this?
Instead of taking responsibility for his actions, Russell engages in Obamaesque excuse making, shucking, jiving, ducking and running. And what's his explanation?
Why, it's this:
10/30/09
Dear Russell for Congress Supporters,
As I am sure many of you have read in the papers, the City of Washougal is undergoing a special investigation by the State Auditor to track down over hundred thousand taxpayer dollars and other mismanagement issues by the current Mayor. I take no delight in leading our council in an inquiry of our current Mayor’s troubles. Mayor Sellers appointed me to the Washougal Parks Board and eventually was the tie breaking vote to have me appointed to a seat on the City Council in 2006. However, after I won election in 2007, I began to see some things that raised big red flags. Here are some examples:
1.) While having a city finance committee, in title only, they did not meet to discuss expenditures in a coordinated fashion. Usually, whatever councilmember was available to quickly review the expenditures would sign off on the accounts payable. Even those not assigned to the committee signed off on accounts payable. In 2009, I asked to be appointed to the finance committee in hopes of moving the committee into a functioning body that would meet routinely to scrutinize every expenditure. I brought forward the idea on several occasions, but there was no desire on behalf of others to make such a commitment.
2.) Our Mayor created an internal rule that Council members could not ask anything of department heads. All correspondence had to go through the Mayor. Department heads were instructed to not to speak with Council members. This made the Council’s job very difficult when seeking to provide substantial oversight of the administration. Again, I was the only one to question this internal rule.
3.) For two years I have been asking for a profit-loss statement for the different city events that the administration had sponsored. Those profit-loss statements never came.
4.) Over the last year we have lost two substantial members of our city staff, our city administrator and finance director. These two individuals left abruptly to take jobs elsewhere. It is my opinion that these two departures some how factor into the bigger mystery that now confronts us.
Rightfully so, this is a very difficult time for our city as we endure public ridicule and scrutiny. I would appreciate your prayers as we work through the administration’s chaos and try to bring a clearer picture to the citizens of Washougal. I am convinced that with a newly elected, conservative Council, coming in January, we will provide a way out of the disaster created by this progressive administration.
For years I was unable to rally any alarm because of the extreme loyalty of the progressive majority on the Council, which followed the Mayor in lockstep. At that point I started to piece together a plan to bring about a conservative majority on the Council. In 2008 I was joined by one other conservative and by the summer of 2009 we gained another. On the eve of the 2009 election, we stand to take a conservative majority on the Council. In the meantime, we in the minority have had to endure policies and procedures that have made us very uncomfortable.
This experience has given me a deeper appreciation for what I am trying to do on a national level. We need sweeping government reform, which brings more accountability to government and places more scrutiny on government than on individuals. Too much control in the hands of the few will always result in disaster and corruption. As your next Congressman, I will fight for open and transparent government. The people deserve to know the truth.
Sincerely,
Jon D. Russell
Republican for U.S. Congress
(WA-3)
Good.
God.
I have never in my life read such a huge crock of self-serving cow manure in the entirety of the twenty-plus years I've been following politics.
Here, for the time-impaired, is the Cliff Notes version of why Russell thinks he bears no responsibility for his failure to act under these circumstances.
Never one to avoid contriving a political gain from something, even when he clearly shares fault; Russell is thrilled to find something he thinks he can twist to his advantage. He was placed on the city finance committee, and never saw anything worth mentioning until the Sellers stupidity. He comes up with a dozen different lies to support his failure to first, act, and second, do anything about a set of nonsensical, unenforceable and "unofficial" rules that precluded siting council members from exercising their First Amendment rights to talk to anyone they want, whenever they want, PARTICULARLY when Russell failed to DO anything about any of these so-called "internal rules."I would ask you, gentle reader, this one very big question:
If our erstwhile Congressional wannabe lacked the testicles to take on a low-rent lowlife like Sellers....
.... what makes anyone believe for one second that he has what it takes to go up against Pelosi, Reid, or that empty-suited anti-American racist bigot running the show?
In short, why would we replace one coward, Baird; with another coward, Russell?
Do you think for one minute that *I* would have settled for being put off, ignored, intimidated?
Is this clown so helpless that he couldn't have written the county or state auditor's office, asking for assistance and an investigation LONG ago if he saw (but as it turns out, failed to act on) so many "red flags" he allegedly observed?
He almost clownishly mentions that
"In 2009, I asked to be appointed to the finance committee in hopes of moving the committee into a functioning body that would meet routinely to scrutinize every expenditure."So, tell us again, Jon... why is it that YOU couldn't have done this ON YOUR OWN???? Like it or hate it, THAT WAS YOUR JOB, A JOB YOU ASKED FOR.
And then this laughable pap:
For years I was unable to rally any alarm because of the extreme loyalty of the progressive majority on the Council, which followed the Mayor in lockstep. At that point I started to piece together a plan to bring about a conservative majority on the Council."Unable to rally any alarm?"
What the hell does THAT mean?
I was "unable to write and provide facts causing an investigation to the State Auditor's office." I was "unable to call a reporter." I was "unable, for that matter, to even call Lars Larsen."
There is a major difference between "unable," and "unwilling."
So, here we have it. When allegedly confronted by incompetence and illegality, what did our young, crusading, city councilman do?
Why, he did absolutely nothing.
Well DONE, Mr. Russell. My confidence in your incompetence increases by the second. And the sure knowledge that you share the trait first mastered by Baird; specifically, that you won't take responsibility for any of the many things you do wrong reinforces to me my decision to do everything I can to keep you out of any elective office that includes me.
"Restore 'trust'," Mr. Russell? The only thing your lack of character and integrity does to me is restore nausea.
.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Obama Brand Condoms: "When HOPE is not enough."
.
This way, the people can do to each other what Obama is doing to us.
Huge hat tip to Doug Ross @ Journal and El Marko
.
This way, the people can do to each other what Obama is doing to us.
Huge hat tip to Doug Ross @ Journal and El Marko
.
Well, SOMEBODY seems just a might upset at my Barnett post.
A fine, upstanding and obviously ignorant individual stopped by and left this little tidbit:
But I'm wagering (heh.... "wagering") that the person who dropped this particular bag of feces off at my door step was/is unaware of Mr. Barnett's history... a history of crime, of corruption, intimidation and documented efforts to interfere with out elections so he could, literally, buy a government friendly to his reservation shopping scheme.
I would ask this mystery poster (and it's not TOO much of a mystery who he is... I've got the IP address) this: when we're confronted with such an individual leading such an underhanded and low life effort against our community.... precisely how much sympathy and concern is one supposed to have when that person, who would do severe injury to this community, is, in turn, injured himself?
Oh, on the surface, I can see where the "nice" thing to do would be to put all that aside, join hands around the campfire and sing "Kumbaya" as we shed a tear over Mr. Barnett's predicament.
I understand that he does have family in the sense that he's the modern, post-divorce Dad. And, I suppose, there is an argument that no children should be deprived of their parent.
But here is a man who has spent tens of thousands, if not millions of dollars to do grievous harm to MY COMMUNITY. Why should I have, or express, sympathy and caring for him, given his lack of sympathy and caring for us?
The particular "Native American" you refer to has precisely ZERO problem using HIS race to ram HIS project down OUR throats.
Let my tell you a little secret: If this "project" had to meet all the same requirements that those of us not possessed of Native American blood had to meet, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
The people of this state have done away with both race-based advantages and disadvantages via I-200. ALL businesses should have to meet the SAME requirements, REGARDLESS of the race of the owners.
And, of course, this little fact: If the city of LaCenter wanted to get rid of the card rooms, they could easily do that. They could just pass a law, and POOF! They're GONE!
Tell me: could they do that with this massive casino operation, a casino that will be one of the largest on the face of the planet? What's that? Did you say "NO?"
Obviously, that'll make ALL the difference to YOU, won't it?
Oh. That's right. You only live about 200 miles north of here... so I guess my answer to that question is, well, "no."
This isn't ABOUT "regulation." This is about the damage this massive cancer on our community will cause.
Whatever you've seen anywhere else is irrelevant. What I'VE seen HERE are threats and intimidation and underhanded dealings, and I've SEEN them from your sainted Mr. Barnett, much like, come to think of it, Dave Somers saw them up in Snohomish.
That may be the kind of relationship that YOU crave.... but me?
Not so much.
THERE"S a good chap.
.
Wow, lets talk about Karma shall we? Anyone who wishes the death of another will have his or her Karma day(s) soon. It is funny how racial people can be about successful Native Americans. I am wondering if YOU are tied to one of the small town "thugs" gaining a "big check" from one of the 3 casinos already in La Center! Talk about "craming"[sic] a casino down ones throat, that area is already choking (as long as it is owned by white people it's okay, right?!) That brings up the "massive criminal impact" theory. Tribal casinos are way more regulated than your small town trash casinos which have attributed to more shadey[sic] action than any I have ever seen at Spirit Mountain, Chinook Winds etc. There will be a casino there, with any luck at all.... Publish Reject (Anonymous) 4:40 PMGee... imagine such anger... directed at little ol' me!
Wow, lets talk about Karma shall we? Anyone who wishes the death of another will have his or her Karma day(s) soon.Well, I'm not exactly sure that I wish the death of Mr. Barnett. In the best of all worlds, Barnett would pick up his football and LEAVE, so the presence of his economic black hole would not infect our local community, acting as a vacuum cleaner to line his pockets and that of the Mohegan Tribe on the other side of the country, and now the Paskenta Tribe down in California.
But I'm wagering (heh.... "wagering") that the person who dropped this particular bag of feces off at my door step was/is unaware of Mr. Barnett's history... a history of crime, of corruption, intimidation and documented efforts to interfere with out elections so he could, literally, buy a government friendly to his reservation shopping scheme.
I would ask this mystery poster (and it's not TOO much of a mystery who he is... I've got the IP address) this: when we're confronted with such an individual leading such an underhanded and low life effort against our community.... precisely how much sympathy and concern is one supposed to have when that person, who would do severe injury to this community, is, in turn, injured himself?
Oh, on the surface, I can see where the "nice" thing to do would be to put all that aside, join hands around the campfire and sing "Kumbaya" as we shed a tear over Mr. Barnett's predicament.
I understand that he does have family in the sense that he's the modern, post-divorce Dad. And, I suppose, there is an argument that no children should be deprived of their parent.
But here is a man who has spent tens of thousands, if not millions of dollars to do grievous harm to MY COMMUNITY. Why should I have, or express, sympathy and caring for him, given his lack of sympathy and caring for us?
"Funny?" You have a bizarre sense of humor.It is funny how racial people can be about successful Native Americans.
The particular "Native American" you refer to has precisely ZERO problem using HIS race to ram HIS project down OUR throats.
Let my tell you a little secret: If this "project" had to meet all the same requirements that those of us not possessed of Native American blood had to meet, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
The people of this state have done away with both race-based advantages and disadvantages via I-200. ALL businesses should have to meet the SAME requirements, REGARDLESS of the race of the owners.
I am wondering if YOU are tied to one of the small town "thugs" gaining a "big check" from one of the 3 casinos already in La Center!
Absolutely. Why, they pay me MILLIONS just to hammer this project on my blog. In fact, every non-tribal casino in the Western United States pays little ol' me and I spend this time and energy beating back this effort not because, unlike you, I actually LIVE here.... but because of the millions I make every year on just this issue alone!
Wow. You sure got me on THAT one. It's ALL about race. NONE of it is about the damage this monstrosity will do to my community; the extra taxes *I* will have to pay, the fact that while the Mohegans pay Connecticut $400 million per year for their operation. and these 3 CARD ROOMS (You DO know the difference and the limitations between massive tribal "megacasinos" and card rooms, right?) pay millions to LaCenter, Barnett won't have to pay the state a dime; or unemployment; or worker's comp, or minimum wage, or for the massive traffic improvements required by as many as 19,000 additional daily trips in an already saturated I-5 corridor, not to mention the social costs that WE will have to pay... no... NONE of that has ANYTHING to do with ANY of this.Talk about "craming"[sic] a casino down ones throat, that area is already choking (as long as it is owned by white people it's okay, right?!)
And, of course, this little fact: If the city of LaCenter wanted to get rid of the card rooms, they could easily do that. They could just pass a law, and POOF! They're GONE!
Tell me: could they do that with this massive casino operation, a casino that will be one of the largest on the face of the planet? What's that? Did you say "NO?"
Obviously, that'll make ALL the difference to YOU, won't it?
Oh. That's right. You only live about 200 miles north of here... so I guess my answer to that question is, well, "no."
Is that what it brings up? It didn't take you long to shift from Karma to crime, did it?That brings up the "massive criminal impact" theory. Tribal casinos are way more regulated than your small town trash casinos which have attributed to more shadey[sic] action than any I have ever seen at Spirit Mountain, Chinook Winds etc.
This isn't ABOUT "regulation." This is about the damage this massive cancer on our community will cause.
Whatever you've seen anywhere else is irrelevant. What I'VE seen HERE are threats and intimidation and underhanded dealings, and I've SEEN them from your sainted Mr. Barnett, much like, come to think of it, Dave Somers saw them up in Snohomish.
That may be the kind of relationship that YOU crave.... but me?
Not so much.
There will be a casino there, with any luck at all....You don't mind awfully if I take a stand, outing those corrupt politicians like Clark County Commissioner Steve Stuart who gratefully used the $100,000 provided by Saint Dave Barnett to corrupt our local government while doing everything I can to keep this crap pile from dumping here, do you?
THERE"S a good chap.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)