Showing posts with label taxpayers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label taxpayers. Show all posts

Thursday, August 29, 2024

The Native American Privilege Card?

More waste of millions from Washington State taxpayers. Not that leftists care.

Since their is no risk of "rising sea levels" (Just ask Barrack Obama with his purchase of a seaside mansion a few years ago) and the likelihood of a tsunami roughly the same as winning powerball, THIS is yet another waste of millions. To, of course, be followed by several million more taxpayer dollars to do something designed to provide this "tribe" with brand new housing in some other location.... not because they HAVE to move... but because they WANT to move.
Where do I get MY Native American Privilege Card?
They want to move?
Swell. I want to move as well, because I might get flooded out by the Columbia River.
Where's MY $3 million? The tribe in question appears to be the Quinaults. You know, the SAME Quinaults who have this thing right on the seaside known as the Quinault Beach Resort & Casino? With casino income, why the hell do they need a dime from us? How many times and in how many ways are these people getting paid off? Are they going to scam the taxpayers of this state to pay them to move their casino as well?

Here's the FB story:

Tuesday, October 06, 2009

The leftists and their lies about I-1033

.
I admit it: I support 1033.

Over time, it has become increasingly clear that leftist scum will lie about anything. For me, that the Vancouver Education Association opposes this initiative is a stand-along reason to support it, since teachers have proven time and time again that their only concern is for themselves.

Their continuing lie that this has anything to do with Colorado's temporarily suspended TABOR law is just that, a lie. But like the local rag and our country's democrat leadership, the left has shown that their is no lie they won't tell to further their agenda.

In all the whining and sniveling in this particular leftist propaganda, absolutely ZERO mention is made of the ability of scum like these to take the simple expedient of ASKING us to fund their greed.

WE pay the bills. The very idea that in times like these, WE should have no say in the matter of when, how and how much is spent is absurd nonsense.

It's the same kind of lies these same kind of people spewed when the late and lamented I-601, or the end of the world as we know it crap of I-200, or certainly the "knock the world off it's axis" of I-695.... or even the out and out lies of the gas tax that we needed so desperately, the gas tax that was going to do OH SO much... only to discover that the project list was and is a fictional sham, long since whacked by around 40%.

The moron running the show, Governor Stupido, was out bleating just the other day that she might have to raise taxes. Well, one could only hope that she tries this stunt next legislative session.... just in time for the spool up to the 2010 general.

The despicable and predictable leftists running the rag will certainly urge us to all vote "no" on I-1033, and cite many of the same lies the scum in this column will use.

But with the tax bit in Christine's mouth, NOW becomes the most important time in this state's history to reign in government.

The very idea so terrifies the leftist with their fangs buried so far in the taxpayer's jugular... that it leads them to lie like these two lied. And because these scum failed to even mention the voter option of I-1033, every thing they sniveled was just that; a lie.
.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

I'm confused: The Seattle Times - Budget comes down to unpleasant choices

.
And what unpleasant choices might those be?

Based on the article, $5 of the so far $8.5 (heading for $10) BILLION deficit is, essentially, taken care of.

That leaves around $3.5 BILLION to take care of.

What confuses me is this: What are the "unpleasant choices?"

First, we eliminate I-728 and I-732 funding. You remember those two initiatives, don't you? Those were the ones that involved classroom size limits and guaranteed pay raises for teachers.

Teachers are government employees.

Now, the WEA thugs who shilled for these two initiatives solemnly swore that we would not need tax increases if they passed; so to get them passed, neither had a designated revenue stream to support them.

Thus the WEA thugs were just the tiniest bit miffed that their initiatives were not funded for a few years... and, based on the WEA's promises, should never had been funded at all.

So, we repeal those initiatives altogether. If the WEA isn't keen on that idea, then they can feel free to float two more initiatives... this time with the taxes attached in the open, instead of hidden.

Next, we suspend all step increases for all government employees at all levels.

Then, we require all government employees at all levels to take 10% pay cuts.

Then we freeze all hiring and implement layoffs until the $3.5 BILLION deficit is eliminated.

Is it unpleasant? Not for me as a citizen. And not nearly as "unpleasant" as the specter of moronic and greedy tax increases.

It's going to be unpleasant for all of the government employee unions; but rest assured, I care exactly as much for them as they do for me.

Many in the legislature have said that our addiction to spending is unsustainable... and they've been saying it for years.

They've also been ignored for years.

The result? An $8.5 BILLION deficit.

Now, the democrats in charge won't implement any of these particular steps... or at least, they won't implement very many of them.

It's not a matter of "choices." It is, instead, a matter of "politics."

We've already seen the Washington State Labor Council's efforts to strong arm the democrats.

There's little doubt that next time they try and muscle their lackeys, they won't do it in any traceable way... but they WILL do it.

So, realistically, we can expect efforts to fund the favorite union programs while "regrettable" cuts will be made to important core services.

Then, the democrats will "regrettably" put BILLIONS in recession-economy-crippling taxes up for a statewide vote... maybe even the dreaded state income tax... again.

They'll portray it completely differently, of course... but that's essentially what we have to look forward to.

Because taking care of the people of this state takes a far, far second place to taking care of the unions that own them.


State budget comes down to unpleasant choices

When it comes to closing the $8.5 billion shortfall in the state budget, the first $5 billion is pretty easy to solve. But that still leaves the state with some gut-wrenching choices to close the rest of the huge budget gap.

Seattle Times Olympia bureau



OLYMPIA — When it comes to closing the $8.5 billion shortfall in the state budget, the first $5 billion is pretty easy to solve.

All the Legislature has to do is drain the state rainy-day fund, spend a few billion dollars in one-time federal money and cut spending in the current fiscal year with some relatively painless moves, at least compared to what's coming, such as a hiring freeze. Those steps alone would shrink the gap to about $3.5 billion.

The problem: It's still the biggest shortfall in state history. The gap continues to grow. And there are no easy fixes left.

Democrats, who control the House, Senate and governor's office, have little choice but to make deep cuts in some of the very programs they've poured money into during the past four years.

"We're getting to stuff that nobody wants to look at," said Sen. Rodney Tom, D-Medina, co-chair of the Senate Ways and Means Committee.

Democratic leaders won't discuss their thinking in detail, but Tom gave a few examples the Senate is considering: eliminating 10,000 slots for students at the state's colleges and universities; cutting $700 million from the class-size initiative, I-728; and reducing sentences across the board for state inmates by 50 to 60 days.

All three areas, higher education, public schools and public safety, were touted as priorities for Democrats in the past. Now they're targets for spending cuts.

More:

Thursday, February 12, 2009

The People win a tremendous victory: Washington State wins lawsuit over union contracts

.
There have been a few unions in that actually get it. Who can forget the local firefighter's decision to at least temporarily fore go pay raises as a result of our doddering economy and reduced government revenues.

Others have been much more moronic in their political tonedeafness and their greed-at-all-cost approach to our state's economic situation.

Among those more self-centered and selfish are the Washington Federation of State Employees. Cementing the idea into the hearts and minds of the people of this state (not to mention their rank and file, who, in the face of forced pay raises would suffer massive layoffs) that those who are SUPPOSED to serve US, instead believe that WE are SUPPOSED to serve THEM is a terrible strategy that is going to cost them in the long run.

Joining with the WFSE in the Gang of the Moron Four, are the SEIU and two of its locals, SEIU Local 1199 and SEIU 925.

These groups have a brain-damaged strategic view. It's a nightmare for the rank and file to see their jobs put at risk in this economy over the issue of pay raises.

The question for the union worker is this: Is it better for SOME to get huge payraises? Or is it better to keep a job with NO pay raise?

Seems simple to me, but unions have never been about the worker as much as they've been about power and thuggery.





Adam Wilson

Wilson:
Adam Wilson Blog

Adam Wilson expounds on Washington state government, workers and politics. Wilson began covering those issues for the Olympian in 2004. He can be reached at: awilson@theolympian.com.


Judge: Gregoire errs, but union lawsuit falters (UPDATED)

• Published February 11, 2009

Gov. Chris Gregoire should have done things differently in negotiating with state employee unions, but her decision to cancel their contracts stands, said Thurston County Superior Court Judge Anne Hirsch.

Gregoire clearly muddied the process when she had her budget director serve both as negotiator and the person who later declared contracts for raises and health benefits financially unreasonable, the judge said today.

But the governor does have the power to back out of contracts after the Oct. 1 deadline to finish talks, Hirsch said, noting the law requires them to be certified by the budget office as feasible.

"The judge punted; we're appealing; stand by," said Greg Devereux, executive director of the Washington Federation of State Employees.

See background here.

UPDATE: Here's an update from Glenn Kuper, of the Office of Financial Management:

It is important to note that the statute on collective bargaining establishes the Labor Relations Office in the Office of Financial Management (41.80.140) and also establishes that the OFM director certifies whether the contracts are financially feasible (41.80.010), so it is misleading to say the Governor “erred” in how she conducted the negotiation process. She simply followed what is dictated in law.