As expected, the Gellatly RINO cult is positioning the local GOP to support democrat Marc Boldt.

It didn't take a genius to figure out this was going to happen.

I am in possession of an email from Davey Delete Gellatly that is so full of lies, half truths and down right misstatements that it must be read to be believed.

So, in this post, I am going to provide the email and then in the follow-on post, I'm going to analyze and interpret Gellatly's lies to tell you what they REALLY mean and, of course, how Davey is going to try to pull this off.

With the RINO stench of the Board majority and the helicopter presence of Carolyn Crain, who Gellatly used as his personal punching bag to me and who set up her fake Republican organization to get my fringe-left brother-in-law elected to county chair combined with the RINO scum who endorsed Ann "Gas Tax" Rivers' RINO puppet in the 18th District... there was little likelihood of any other outcome.

Here's the bogus crap Gellatly has put out to cover his scam.

Enjoy!

From: David Gellatly <davidgellatly@clarkrepublicans.com>
Date: January 8, 2018 at 12:50:20 PM PST
To: XXXXX
Subject: Re: CCCU concerns over comments
Reply-To: David Gellatly <davidgellatly@clarkrepublicans.com>

XXXXX

I included XXX on this clarification[sic] for you with regards to the Columbian. Hope this helps and please keep in mind the agenda of the Columbian often determines the words and quotes they use.

1. Someone "leaked' this board action to the Columbian and focused this action with regards to Marc Bolt[sic], which the Columbian decided to create a story out of. I am not aware who did this.
2. As I stated to the Columbian, the board action was not implemented with this direct purpose in mind but rather the common practice to give the new board a clean slate, which was especially necessary after the faulty decisions of the previous board.
3. It is correct that all previous actions by previous boards do not continue over the the[sic] next, and therefore the censure was lifted some years ago, and any previous sanctions are no longer valid.
4. I have met and "chatted" with nearly every elected official[sic] in Clark County and the City of Vancouver. Marc happens to be one of the few I have not yet had the opportunity to do so with and the only member of the county council I have not yet met with. Discussion in[sic] not considered any type of endorsement but rather the necessary dialogue to give our a party a voice. If we do not communicate with the elected officials in a respectful manner, we can not expect to get any results we hope for.
5. Personally, I will remain neutral in all races until after the primary season and the body of the 180 members of the CCRCC has made endorsements. The chairman does not make endrorsements[sic] for the party, only the majority of its members have this ability. Once these endorsements are made, I will do my best to support these candidates for election.
6. We will support all elected Republicans in between election seasons as per the purpose of the CCRP. However, we will have discussion will all elected officials to give our platform and core values a voice.
7. The CCRP has recently moved in the correct direction and should be much more effective moving forward. Our constituents are very excited to rejoin our party again and make a positive difference in our community. 
8. Thank you for your support for our president! We definitely share in this support and excitement.

Please relay these points to your friends and neighbors who joined in your concern. Please let me know if you have any other questions I can help with.

Have a great week,

David Gellatly

On January 8, 2018 at 2:47 PM David Gellatly <davidgellatly@clarkrepublicans.com> wrote:

XXXXXX

Thank you for reaching out. It is a normal practice for new boards to recind[sic] previous board's policies and decisions which they had in place under their time. The board prior to the current had made many false statements in their decision making process and it was important for us to clean the slate. This is not a controversial[sic] thing to do, it is a common practice and common sense. While the censure of Marc Bolt[sic] was in fact technically lifted at the end of that board's term years ago, the answer to the Columbian is simple and clear; 'our board has a clean slate to make decisions and is not held to previous board's decisions". If the Columbian decided to write about Bolt, as I stated in the article, this was not the purpose our the board's decision.

As far as your concerns with meeting[sic] with elected officials, this is my duty as chair of one of the major parties in Clark County. I meet with the chair of the democrats, I meet with the democratic mayor and yes, I will meet with independants[sic] like Marc Bolt[sic] to ensure our parties' voice is heard on all levels and see were we can work with those our constituents has[sic] chosen for office.

In an election season, we will support the most conservative voice who can win the position. In the day to day processes, we will work with those elected where we can to accomplish common goals and agendas. If anyone questions whether meeting with those elected and working to move our platform forward in Clark County is reasonable, then I would question whether or not they understand how government works. We must have diolague[sic] to make change. Discussion is not an endorsement, it is how things get done.

As far as Trump goes, our party has been extrememly[sic] supportive and communicated this regularly. Our party is and has moved is[sic] a very positive direction in the recent months and should be a much more effective organization. We are very excited about the direction of the party, as are the majority of supporters flooding back now the we have corrected course. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive and we have brought integrity back to our organization and working are now together in a way we can be very proud of. Of course we deal with the continuing lies and trash in radical bloggers writings, but that has no affect on reality nor the majority of opinons,[sic] and of agendas the Columbian pushes.

I communicate with constituents regularly and through out the county and look forward to a great year in 2018. I would love to see you at some of the events so you can stay informed on the direction and progress of the CCRP! I hope this provides clarity for you and those you communicate with. We will have updates which any and all are free to join tostay[sic] informed.



Thanks for all you do.

Sincerely,

David Gellatly


On January 8, 2018 at 2:07 PM wrote:

I'm hoping you are aware that the Republican base is the unincorporated and rural areas.  When these folks vote, they do control the outcome.  That is good for the party, except when the party supports the wrong people, as was seen the last election.  These folks are conservative, some more and some less, but they have one thing in common.  If the Republican party does not support people they want, they either won't vote, or they will vote for the other side.  This is unique to the party.  The opposite party supporters don't do that. This dictates the direction the Republican party must go, regardless of who is in charge.

These are people who just want to be left alone by government and live their lives according to their beliefs and comfort levels.  They are not happy with the majority of the Republicans holding office today, because, except for Liz Pike, they have done very little on their behalf.  They are particularly unhappy with Mark Boldt, Jeanne Stewart and Julie Olson.  We expect you will see them voicing their dissatisfaction at the next election.

A recent article in the Columbian claimed the party rescinded all of the former board's work, which included sanctions on Mark Boldt.  The article went on to say that you were going to meet with him for discussion.  The question your base is asking is just what you will be discussing?  This is a concern to CCCU and should be to you.  There is a distinct line between voting Republicans and voting Democrats.  With all of the upheaval within the Republican party, conservative voters are becoming concerned that the party they usually support, has gone in the wrong direction.

As a review, the voting Republican base supported David Madore, and as you know, he would have won the seat again, if Jeanne Stewart and Tom Mielke had not split the vote.  This would have happened, even when he was not actively campaigning.  Those folks are what you are depending on.  If you do not focus on their concerns, they will not focus on your candidates.   Please consider the direction the party is going, and try to bring it back to true conservative voters.  As you know, the voters are in control, and it only takes one vote to decide an election.

PS.....They are very happy with President Trump and the changes he has made.  This fact can give you an idea of where the party needs to go.

Best Regards,