On December 5th, I called out the democratian for lying.
Again.
They're lying, of course, because lying is what these scum do.
And here's just another example of where us "responsible gun owners" damned sure WILL "notice" it.
Yeah.
We won't notice it.
Again.
EXPANSION OF BACKGROUND CHECKS WON'T BE NOTICED BY RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERS
They're lying, of course, because lying is what these scum do.
And here's just another example of where us "responsible gun owners" damned sure WILL "notice" it.
WAFLAGMore:
I-594: The Department of Revenue Reacts
The Washington Department of Revenue has issuedguidance on the tax effects of I-594 and begins to unravel some of the mystery surrounding the ill-considered new law.The critical take-away’s include that while the dealer in a non-dealer to non-dealer transaction is not required to collect sales or use tax from the buyer/transferee (person receiving the gun), the recipient is required to pay use tax. Failure to pay this tax leaves the recipient vulnerable to a range of legal penalties, much as does non-payment of any other tax.Where in the past, use tax was often overlooked and enforcement was rare as a casual transaction between two individuals was, at best, difficult to track. Post-594, the Department of Revenue requires that records of the transfer business transaction be retained by the FFL for four years (plus the current year), making tracking back unpaid use tax merely tedious (audits, lots of audits) rather than the near impossibility of the past.
Yeah.
We won't notice it.
No comments:
Post a Comment