Expect a mirror image of the 2022 primary again this time around... with an antifa Marie win in the general.

I hope against hope that I'm wrong.

As the congressional primary heats up here locally... I expect a replay... with the same outcome... of the last primary that was a bloodbath here and which resulted in antifa Marie's win.

It's why Lewallen is running on the GOP side and once again. I expect establishment RINOS to spend millions at the last minute to keep Kent out.

The same people that did it last time are still here. They're still active. And they still don't care if the GOP maintains House control or not. In fact, our local fake Republican billionaire would prefer democrat control.

I've suspected this effort since the last election. They will do it again this election because it worked last time, so they have no reason not to do it again.

THIS time, they're not even trying to hide it.

Here's an indicator of why my conclusion is supported:

Media hiding reality. Is it based on raced?

Recently, two teenagers were found shot to death within a mile of each other on I-5 in the vicinity of the North 85th Street on-ramp towards North Seattle.

This was the headline picture on KIRO 7 News:



Couple of happy, sweet-looking kids... maybe 5th graders.

But that's not the reality of today. THIS is the reality of today:



You won't see or read anything about this in the story by KIRO 7's Debra Horne.

Why won't you?

Why was this left out?

I appreciate Debra Horne's reportage. But sometimes, I get the feeling that we're not being told the whole story for some reason. And why might that be?

These were not "children". Why are they being portrayed that way? Why is their gang-banger wannabe profile being withheld? Why not tell the WHOLE truth? Why show their pictures as if they were 11?

Is this a tragedy? Perhaps. But if so, it was a tragedy years in the making with this inevitable outcome and all this "grief" is a product of those portrayed as parents and relatives and who are definite accessories for this outcome.

If black lives are to matter... then why didn't the lives of these kids matter back when something could be done to impact this horrific outcome?

Why is this being soft-sold? Why not tell the WHOLE truth? 

Is the picture with these kids playing gangster stereotypical?

Absolutely. But that's neither here nor there. It's ALSO the TRUTH.

Was it left out so as to not possibly interfere with the obligatory GoFundMe rip off pages set up for the funeral of these gangsters? (As of this writing, just under $25,000 has been raised in part due to Horne's advertisement and pictures showing then-innocent children as opposed to now, the not-so-innocent gangster types)

There's an element of fraud to all of this. And Horne, et al, damned well know it.

This is more than a blatant attempt at total manipulation. They knew it, and anyone reading their tripe knew it.

And this is why media becomes increasingly less-trusted and more despised.

Had Horne laid out the WHOLE story, the families wouldn't have made a dime off this inevitable outcome. So, she didn't.

Simple, really, when you think about it.

I wrote this a year ago: still applies today. Today’s random thought: why does the media hide war and violence from us?

The thought occurred to me this morning that in America, we don’t see real violence. We don’t see real war. We don’t see real murder. We don’t see the results of a DUI where innocents are killed and/or maimed. We don’t see people getting shot or stabbed to death. We don’t, for example, see the bodies of children blown apart by Russian missiles/bombs. We live in a pixilated reality.

Why?

The irony of all of this is we’re regaled with the FAKE, FICTIONAL variety of those acts all the time. But when we see it in a movie or the odd TV show, we don’t react nearly as much as we would if we saw the real thing because our conscious mind is typically able to separate the fictional from the real.

For example, right now in Iran, the government of that country routinely arrests, murders and sexually assaults women who refuse/protest against their idiotic hajib rules. As many as 1200 girls were recently poisoned in schools over this issue. THERE female oppression is VERY real.

But we don’t see it. We’re not allowed to see it. Because what the media shows us are vague, pixilated shots that could be anything but which only vaguely resembles the outline of what could be a human being.

We don’t see actual mangled bodies. We don’t see people blown to pieces. We don’t see torture victims. We’re left to imagine it if we believe it’s happened at all.

Why is that? Who made the decision that we can’t be “offended” by reality?

Another example is gun shots. Media plays word games: In real life, someone shot but not killed is “wounded,” not “injured.”

Athletes get “injured.” Since when was the decision made to expand the word “injured” to cover bullet or other wounds inflicted as a result of war or crimes?

Many reading this have never noticed these nuanced uses of words. Few seeing these pixilated images that force us to take the narrator’s word for it as opposed to making our own judgments by using our own eyes (After all, didn’t someone at some point say that “a picture is worth a 1000 words?”) to see for ourselves, even realize it.

I believe that these decisions have become policy to keep us from becoming inflamed with true outrage.

What would America’s attitude towards those pushing fentanyl be if we were shown the actual corpses of the children who died from these overdoses?

How much would we be favoring allowing anyone to drink/use drugs and then drive, slaughtering thousands on our roads every year in the face of our own legislature refusing to drop the blood alcohol content for a DUI standard while hundreds will die on this state’s roads because these same people, floating on a sea of mostly free alcohol, refuse to put themselves at risk for these charges and refuse to do that which they demand we do: don’t drink and drive?

King County has no more room at the morgue because of drug use. Would it be helpful if we were shown what actually happens if you OD on drugs? Would the ignorant in, say, Oregon, which is now perhaps the most drug infested state in the country have voted for legalization had they actually seen the REAL impacts of drug use before their vote?

The Real World is frequently brutal. And in this country, much of the brutality is because we ALLOW it. We ALLOW gun crime. We ALLOW the sale of these drugs that are killing us. We ALLOW our troops to get engaged in wars we have no business in. We ALLOW shootings, rapes and assaults because we, as a nation, rarely see the true reality of what these things do. We ALLOW and DO BUSINESS with China who uses slave labor and imprison hundreds of thousands of people because they happen to be Muslim. We do NOTHING except to continue to shovel hundreds of millions of dollars to Iran who is beating their own people to death merely because they can and these people happen to disagree with archaic rules used to oppress an entire gender.

Would the Gay Lobby be so supportive of these people if they could get a close up look at what happens to people thrown off roof tops of buildings because they happen to be homosexual?

You know, TRUE oppression and tyranny? The real thing? The irony of gays supporting Palestine pegs the meter: what would happen to these same people if they were gay and actually IN Palestine?

I believe that many of the American perceptions of these things are based on an imposed level of ignorance. I believe that this is just one of many areas where we are deliberately kept in the dark so we don’t KNOW.

Because to KNOW is to be OUTRAGED. Because what are the impacts on government if the American people became truly enraged?

And we can’t have that.

Can we?

OK, CNN, can you explain why this clown still has a job?

A few days ago, on another propaganda effort designed to keep people on the leftist plantation (King-Charles on your network) they were discussing a snippet of a comment made by Mr. Trump who had indicated that at least part of the black voter reaction to his legal issues included seeing blacks wearing t-shirts with his mug shot on them, Charles Barkley, a long retired former NBA jock who at one point, back in his "I'm not paid to be a role model," days, indicated he'd play for the Klan if the money was right:

“I can be bought. If they paid me enough, I’d work for the Klan.”

Said this:

“First of all, I’m just gonna say this: if I see a Black person walking around with a Trump mug shot, I’m gonna punch him in the face.”

When King responded the way you'd expect a normal cohost to respond: “Charles, you can’t say that because you don’t mean that.”

Barkley replied: “I mean that sincerely,”

“And then you will be arrested for assault and then what?” King asked.

“I’m gonna go bail myself out and go celebrate,” Barkley said.

For my part, I also would have asked: "and how much can you afford with the lawsuits that follow," since this guy's major motivation is clearly money.

But that's neither here nor there.

In 2024, Mr. "I'm not paid to be a role model" ripped the scab off the unpleasant reality of leftist hatred and bigotry in the current campaign.

Does anyone reading this remotely believe that if a WHITE talk show cohost on CNN said that they'd be employed on that network (or any other) today... or ever?

Of course not. And I get that it's OK in the minds of some for blacks to threaten each other much like they shoot each other these days and no one does anything about it.

But this is the kind of remark where Mr. Trump is blamed for the non-existent insurrection the left keeps lying about.

Leftists demand that Trump be imprisoned because in their hate-filled minds, they've already convicted him for something he has never even been charged for.

Barkley is, in fact, guilty of stirring up race-based hatred because Trump, of course, is white... and how dare any black anywhere support someone white who is to the right of Mao?

How can this guy still be on TV? How can anyone be threatening violence, who said, of his own volition, that he "meant it sincerely?"

Barkley, who is his own biggest fan by far, needs to be held accountable.

But he won't be.

And we all know why.

Meanwhile, a few very large black men, including Mike Tyson, have shown up on social media wearing the shirts in question suggesting that they "understand Charles Barkley is looking for" them.

Barkley, for his part, is now on the apology tour and even speaks to certain political realities: mainly, that democrats have done nothing for blacks and that the only time they care about them is every 4 years around election time.

He knows that. He clearly understands that. But he insists on continuing the insanity of devotion to a political party that has not gone beyond taking black voters completely for granted... while seemingly expecting a different outcome as a reward for black voter devotion to leftist racism.

This video from The Black Conservative channel on YouTube explains it: