A few words concerning the WNBA discriminating against men, i.e., defining what a woman is.

A few words concerning the WNBA discriminating against men, i.e., defining what a woman is.

Under federal employment law, they can't exclude/discriminate based on race, religion, national origin, age, disability, genetic information or gender.

They have to be an equal opportunity employer.

Limiting it to women only would be a civil rights violation.

If it were THAT simple, chances are they'd have already done it to put an end to this discussion.

"Under the laws enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), it is illegal to discriminate against someone (applicant or employee) based on their race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, sexual orientation, gender or genetic information."

That is the main reason the conference the WNBA held concerning male players resulted in nothing.

In short, the WNBA has no choice in this matter, their protests and "unnamed sources" notwithstanding.

The saga of the WNBA, Enes Kantner Freedom and Royce White.

 Matt Walsh lays it all out in this post "White said he'd be "unstoppable" in the women's league — and says a discrimination suit is coming if he goes undrafted."

WNBA basketball... which is worthless as a sport regardless, given that any big city high school boys team would destroy the WNBA Champs... was never worth watching and now has devolved into a racist, back supremacist soap opera... will now get the opportunity to put up, or shut up.

Men claiming to be women is a joke. No amount of mutilation/butchery/chemistry changes biology.

Trans women are men.

Trans men are women.

The WNBA has turned into a thug factory, where racist, bigoted black women believe because of the level of melanin in their skin, they're entitled to assault white women, and then express dismay at consequences; a not altogether foreign concept among younger blacks these days.

And leftist white women, including Caitlin "whites have privilege" Clark agree with black women as victims.

Now, at least two MEN, both former NBA players, have left the closet and are acknowledging their feminist side by demanding to be drafted by the WNBA in their upcoming draft, including Enes Kantor Freedom and Royce White.

Clark, for her part, has credited black women for building the WNBA, apparently both leaving out massive NBA subsidies that allow the league to exist as well as leaving out the part where those same women have built it into a debacle losing $40 to $50 million per year, most recently in 2024.

The woke WNBA (just another reason to ignore those clowns) has come out in full-throated support of fake women, but has with rare exception (Griner) not had to deal with the issue of men in their locker rooms.

Now they will have to.

Both Kantor and White are light years ahead of the best WNBA players in skills and abilities. And the WNBA has neatly painted itself into a corner where they MUST translate their support for the fake women's movement into action where now they MUST draft men posing as fake women.

White, for his part, has indicated he'll sue if he's not drafted. And if he and Kantor ARE drafted, then the end result will be an all trans basketball league where women will, once again, be hoisted on the petard of their own making.

A league with Kantor and White in it would be the harbinger of things to come and might finally, FINALLY drag the league into profitability instead of their continued existence being the punchline in a joke that's getting old.

I would dare the black supremacist women to attempt their thuggery on these two guys.

Why can't women figure this out? (fake women athletes...)

The people making the most money off  the insanity of fake women polluting women's sports have put out a new informercial.

It's not on YouTube as yet, so this is the best I can do for now:  

It shows a variety of adults doing adult stuff, advocating for what I believe is the only sane response to the stupidity of fake females being given the same consideration as the real thing:

I responded to it thusly:

When you KEEP DOING THE SAME THING, OVER AND OVER, WHILE EXPECTING A DIFFERENT OUTCOME, WHAT IS THAT CALLED?

Insanity.

Here's the thing.

You can take control of this situation now... and END it NOW... or you can continue to get your asses kicked for however many more YEARS it will take to fix this through channels.

You can continue to have men in your locker rooms. Men on your teams. Men invading your spaces and taking your awards for YEARS to come.

OR... you can stop it RIGHT, FRICKING, NOW.

This is not what is "right". If it was about what is "right," you'd never have had to face this insanity in the first place.

The question now is how do you deal with TODAY'S REALITY?

Wishing, hoping, praying, waiting for a system that acts like you're pushing a string AIN'T GONNA CUT IT.

You do you. But don't try and play victim of a system YOU ALLOW TO EXIST.

Nope. I'm done.

ONLY WOMEN control who is involved in women's sports.

No one else. And I'm done supporting a profit-based cause whining about women's sports when women could end it all in one day.

YES, it will suck. YES, it will hurt.

BUT NOTHING ELSE WILL GET IT DONE.

And you damned well know it.

ALL women/girls have to do is simply refuse to play with or against fake women. Forfeit. Walkaway

You know it. I know it. Everyone reading this knows it.

And instead of whining about men not doing what you want them to do, you never advocate for what women have the power to do NOW as WOMEN control this entire issue.

Why?

Not because you want to see this succeed.

But because if it DID succeed, it would destroy your T-Shirt/Hat swag sales.

In fact, I'm getting sick of your incessant whining because you fail to focus on the one indisputable fact you have ignored:

WOMEN control this issue. No one else.

ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE"S MONEY TO BE MADE OFF THE SWAG.

And buying your stuff hasn't/won't change anything.

How many more years to you want this to go on, The Riley Gaines Show Riley Gaines?

I have ALWAYS been opposed to males invading female sports.

But I've also watched people take advantage of this situation... not to change any of it.  But to make bank off of it.

XX-XY Athletics is one such company.

And as a result, it's not in THEIR best financial interests to accomplish the stated goal of allowing ONLY biological women to engage in women's sports and spaces.

There's HUGE money to be made. And this company is making it with their swag

XX-XY Athletics has seen revenue growth in 38 countries. (There does not appear to be any company valuation or revenue figures available. And I get why that is.)

Their stated goal is:

At XX-XY Athletics our mission is to empower female athletes and take a stand for fair competition.

But that tends to beg the issue.

What happens to the company if their goal is ever achieved?

 Is it in the company's best interests to keep things as they are?

Or is it to achieve their stated goal?

With "fairness" actually achieved, why would anyone buy their branded products?

They wouldn't.

As I stated above:

ONLY WOMEN control who is involved in women's sports.

No one else. And I'm done supporting a profit-based cause whining about women's sports when women could end it all in one day.

YES, it will suck. YES, it will hurt.

BUT NOTHING ELSE WILL GET IT DONE.

And you damned well know it.

ALL women/girls have to do is simply refuse to play with or against fake women. Forfeit. Walkaway

You know it. I know it. Everyone reading this knows it.

And instead of whining about men not doing what you want them to do, you never advocate for what women have the power to do NOW as WOMEN control this entire issue.

Why?

Not because you want to see this succeed.

But because if it DID succeed, it would destroy your T-Shirt/Hat swag sales.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out what XX-XY Athletics refuses to point these facts out... instead, sending out what is presumably a teen aged female demanding "Maybe more adults could stand up for us?"

I spent 35 years in politics. I long since learned the difference between "Motion," and "Action."

And this company does not, in any way, believe in "Action." They do little to nothing to actually ACHIEVE their stated goal.

And while the reason(s) are obvious, it's clear that their main motive isn't their stated goal of female athletic empowerment.

It is, instead, profit.

Profiting off the pain of women who encounter the sickness of fake females invading their lives while most authority doesn't care or actually supports that invasion.

There's money to be made in pain, ladies and gentlemen. 

So, let's skip the actual, only realistically available cure of surgically ending this charade and keep the pain going.

THAT should become their mission statement, because THAT is what they're doing.

Time to put the fake women issue to bed: Unite and go on strike - refuse to compete

When is enough... enough?

When will females realize that no one is helping them? That no one cares? That no one in authority will do the right thing on the issue issue because they know they don't HAVE to?

In fact, school districts in Washington State who rebel against this fringe-left insanity find themselves at legal risk as the state is threatening to cut off ALL funding if they don't implement and/or stick with their trans ideology.

These scum are willing to hurt ALL students in school district rebelling against this cult.  They refuse to abide to the state effort to ram their social engineering down the throats of these kids while refusing to care about actual females.

Government not only allows female's personal spaces to be invaded by males, they demand it. They've forced girls to undress in front of males claiming to be girls... and that has happened in our schools.

There's a large group of videos out there showing fake women crushing the real thing. Smashing skulls, throwing them down... destroying them competitively for one reason: they're males.

They know it because women will continue to do the only thing that, were they to stop, would end this horror show practically immediately.



Women/girls getting hurt because some man portending to be female is injuring them without a second thought.... sometimes, permanently.

I have no sympathy for women or girls on this issue any longer. 

I recognize they didn't ask for this insanity to be imposed upon them.

However, since the start of this idiocy, they've have had the power to end it.

For whatever the reason, they've chosen not to do so.

All women/girls have to do is refuse to play against... or with... fake women.

Simply refuse. Forfeit. Quit.

Will it suck? Of course. Will there be massive pressure, trumped up allegations, lies, media assassinations, retaliation by teacher union thugs? Absolutely.

But had the females on these teams or in these events... refused to play or otherwise compete? The problem would disappear overnight.

Women control this. They make these choices to become punching bags for fake women.

And we're supposed to be upset over these women/girls deciding to compete against men/boys? When they do NOT have to?

They can either stand by and change nothing... or they can get active and change everything.

But what's the alternative?

There is no other way.

Men beating women boxers senseless. Why don't women put a stop to it?

 Here's a video of a fake woman boxer beating the hell out of a real woman boxer. Of course it's outrageous. Of course it's insane.

And I felt terrible about it for a minute as the crickets continued to chirp from the feminist hypocrites and leftists everywhere.

But then I was reminded of this one fact: women and women alone have the ability to stop this insanity.

What would have happened if every woman athlete in the entire Olympics banded together and refused to participate as long as fake women were allowed to beat them senseless?

And I mean EVERY woman in EVERY sport.

What would the IOC have done?

They would have caved. Immediately. But they take women for granted because they can. And women are getting beaten to a pulp as a result.

It's on you, women. I don't feel sorry or angry at all now. If you want to get hammered like a nail competing with fake women, that's on you.

YOU can put a STOP to this. That you don't and you risk your life competing against men?

That's your choice. Riley Gaines

Video at the link: `

https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1818271404510310763

The time has come for the military to remove women from ground combat MOS's.

Army’s top enlisted soldier backs ACFT as Congress mulls future of the fitness test

Soldiers take the Army Combat Fitness Test at Blue Mountain Track at Fort Indiantown Gap, Pa., on Sept. 9, 2023. (Kate Kramer/U.S. Army National Guard)

Of COURSE this guy backs Army stupidity.

I'm happy that Congress has stepped in to deal with this insanity.

There needs to be only one fitness standard, regardless of gender.

Infantry qualified women, for example, need to be just as strong, just as fast and just as agile as the men. Otherwise, if they ever are allowed on the battlefield in an infantry role (Although there have been infantry qualified women since 2017, first, they do NOT have to meet these requirements in the infantry and second, no woman that I can find has ever been awarded the Combat Infantry Badge, which indicates that no woman has ever been deployed, trained or not, in the infantry ground combat role.) they will cause more of their own and others deaths in their unit than they will cause enemy deaths.

The Army's Command Sergeant Major would not have been given the job if he had not promised, directly or indirectly, to be anything less than a cheerleader for Army policies... no matter how obviously idiotic they may be.

In the House, the GOP plan is to get rid on this insanity altogether.

In the Senate, they opened Pandora's Box by requiring the ACFT to be what was initially promised: gender neutral.

That is, as it is now, women do NOT have to be as strong as men or as fast. There IS a double standard in the area of physicality, no matter how much Department of Defense/Department of the Army claims women are "equal."

If women in the military are equal, it's only in the Orwellian sense that all pigs are equal... but some pigs are more equal than others.

Bullets, however, don't care. And unbelievably, the standards in the Army have been lowered in the name of gender equality to, for example, this:

To pass this test... you need to be able to do ten pushups.

Ten.

I actually do get the Army's conundrum here: On one hand, the Army is well aware of the strenuous nature of combat. On the other hand, when they test women to the same standard as men for a genuine combat-needs physical test, the reality of women being typically unfit for the physical demands of combat becomes clear as the vast majority of women fail... which results in democrats delusionally demanding that women NOT fail... which resulted in this horrific reduction in standards to keep women in the military because of the reality that in a combat environment, women will be inferior, will get killed in greater numbers, will sustain more injuries, will lack the needed stamina and as a result, will cause more deaths and wounds to their fellow soldiers who have to not only close with and kill the enemy, but look out for the women who simply cannot keep up.

The solution is obvious: bow to reality and remove women from any ground combat role. This is the defacto policy of the Army anyway, since no women appear to have ever been deployed in the ground-combat role, even though thousands have allegedly been qualified to perform in such a role.

Leftists, of course, demand equality in all things, even when, for example, that equality is impossible to achieve as a result of physical inferiorities that are well known. Thus, they would rather go through the kabuki dance of claiming women in the infantry are a reality, even if, to date, none appear to have been deployed in the standard infantry unit in ground combat.

Leftists are more concerned with "equal opportunity" than equal qualifications and/or equal abilities.

And they'll stand on a mountain of dead soldiers to try and make their point. Even as they fail.

There's a reason women aren't protesting over the obvious inequity of the draft; where, for example, men have to register and women don't. Some inequalities appear to be JUUUUUUST fine when one is in the "situational equality" business as opposed to the genuine article.

The military's insistence on a false equivalency as equality puts the security of our nation at risk. And the illustrated lowered standards, done entirely to accommodate women and their supporters who simply do not understand nor care about the issue of lethality will, one day, cost us rivers of blood as we continue to waste hundreds of millions of dollars training women who, to date, have not been allowed to do the jobs that we the taxpayers have paid them to do.

Review Marine SGM Justin LeHew's response to the insanity of the Navy ignoring the findings of the only actual ground combat test involving three separate units, one of all men, one of mixed gender and one of all women to get a glimpse of the women in ground combat reality.

The "integrated task force experiment" showed the institutional weaknesses of women in the ground combat role, and Obama's Secretary of the Navy made it clear he'd reject any findings that did not support the derangement of that meme.

In short, facts had no place in the consideration of this lunacy.

https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your-marine-corps/2015/09/14/marine-war-hero-secnav-off-base-on-women-in-combat/

https://ec.militarytimes.com/static/pdfs/Sgt-Maj-Justin-Lehew-Facebook-post.pdf