His latest stupidity?
The video game medal, aka, the "Distinguished Warfare Medal," moronically rated ABOVE the Bronze Star with Combat "V" device.
Distinguished Warfare Medal
The Distinguished Warfare Medal, which could go to servicemembers who never set foot in a combat zone, but launch drone strikes or cyberattacks that kill or disable an enemy.
Dysfunctional Veteran's take on what the medal SHOULD look like. ^
Nice looking medal that should not have ANY higher rating than any medal that can get the "V" device.
There is no "Valor" in playing with a joy stick and pushing some buttons. To rate this video game medal higher is rank, pogue, stupidity.
And here's the thing: some in Congress already know that.
Lawmakers introduce bill to demote Pentagon's new medal
By Joyce Tsai
Stars and Stripes
Published: February 27, 2013
Related
Lawmaker asks for review of Distinguished Warfare Medal
Troops use humor to disparage new medal
New medal for modern warfare sparks strong reaction
Pentagon creates new medal for cyber, drone warsMore:
DOD's memo and award criteria for the Distinguished Warfare Medal
WASHINGTON — Lawmakers are lashing out at the Pentagon’s creation of the Distinguished Warfare Medal - intended to honor the contributions of drone pilots and cyber warriors who haven’t set foot on the battlefield - by introducing legislation that would ban it from being rated on par with or above the Purple Heart.
A trio of veterans serving in Congress, Reps. Duncan Hunter, D-Calif., Tom Rooney, R- Fl., and Tim Murphy, R-Pa., introduced the bill on Wednesday, in response to what has been a public outcry against the creation of the medal, which was announced on Feb. 13.
“Combat valor awards have a deep and significant meaning to those who serve in America’s military,” said Hunter, a former Marine, in a statement. “These awards represent not just actions, but also the courage and sacrifice that derive from experiences while in harm’s way. And those engaged in direct combat put their lives on the line, accepting extraordinary personal risk.”
No comments:
Post a Comment