Thursday, June 23, 2011

A moment with Moeller.

.
We all know Jim Moeller, neo-Communist from the 49th District.  Typically, if there's a fringe-left position politically, Moeller's all over it.

Over the years, Moeller's reputation as an arrogant ass is legendary.  He typically insults and belittles those wise enough to disagree with him and his bizarre antics, most recently, he's earned the sobriquet "Candy Man" for his moronic "this-is-candy, this-isn't" tax, a tax thoroughly trashed at the polls last November, so I wasn't terribly surprised when I read the following garbage on the Lazy C this morning:


Lew Waters · Top Commenter · Works at Curmudgeon & Blogger
Plans move forward even though the vote from citizens if postponed.

Obviously, the loot rail mafia has no intention of listening to citizens and will shove this entire scam off no matter what.

Downtown fatcats will increase their wealth off of our backs.
...
This is not representative government.
See More
 
  • Kage McClued · Owner/Writer at Clark County Politics Blog
    These people don't care what we want. They just demand that WE pay for it.... since they won't have too.
  • Jim Moeller · Friends with Marcus Griffith
    Lew: Name calling and impugning the character (...the loot rail mafia..") of those who oppose your opinion ("This is not representative government...") doesn't elevate the debate. It only inflames it. What is your motive? Engender debate of the issue or inflame it?
Good God. I spit up all over my keyboard when I read this from Moeller. Jim, do you want us to list all of the examples of this very thing coming from you?


Hypocrisy does nothing to further Moeller's position, either. The motive? A vote on this entire sorry, inexcusable waste of billions of dollars. Those who ignore this fundamental right, such as Moeller himself, particularly when they do so based on their self-professed arrogance; or those who lie to get elected and then do all they can to KEEP us from voting (Leavitt and Stuart) deserve a hell of a lot more than just "name-calling;" and the accurate description of their character... because it's only "impugning" if the facts don't support the conclusions. When they do, as they do in this called "truth."

Moeller's insulting behavior and rank arrogance is the thing legends are made of.  For him to berate someone else for the very same behavior he ROUTINELY engages in puts him at the top of the rank hypocrisy list.

1 comment:

Lew said...

Apparently Jim forgets his many exchanges with Larry Patella and even Sound Politics listed one of his snitty replies back in 2005 over the Gregoire election steal.