So, Brancaccio pleads guilty to wanting to shove yet another tax or fee down our throats so 99% of US pay for something HE wants.
What he's NOT "guilty" of is volunteering his rag to be taxed to pay for this waste of money.
So what if you don’t like baseball or don’t plan to go? Could that still be a win for you?
Some would argue no. Fair enough. I respect that view. But I’d argue yes. There simply are certain things — like this ballpark and a professional baseball team — that show a certain coming-of-age aspect to the area. That would be good.
But what about this needed tax support to help build it? Aren’t we cutting back just about everywhere?
Yes we are. And that’s a valid point. But that’s the beauty of an entertainment tax. Essentially, only entertainment would be taxed.
You buy entertainment, you help pay for entertainment. Unlike a sales tax that impacts everyone, this impacts only those who use entertainment.Gee. What a surprise.... Moron.
Where have we seen that before?
How about this, instead:
You buy newspapers, you help pay for the newspaper. Unlike a sales tax that impacts everyone, this impacts only those who buy a newspaper.I sure don't see him volunteering HIS rag to help pay for this. Why not?
While Brancaccio's babble is frequently bereft of sense, this kind of self-serving garbage is just that: self serving garbage.
What this REALLY means is that like every other downtown mafia type, he believes that this means their ability to steal our money for their uses has "come-of-age."
Of course, that also makes him guilty of being a hypocrite.
As a permanent member of the downtown mafia, Identity Vancouver types, Brancaccio is guilty of a wide variety of things.
He's guilty of a rank leftist bias.
He's guilty of doing the democrat's bidding like they were paying him by actively covering up Jim Jack's misconduct, pre-resignation, from the legislature.
He's guilty of using his position as editor and the column that position gives him to beat the hell out of those who are wise enough to oppose his utopian view.
He's guilty of running a paper that lies, exaggerates and avoids every tenet of journalism to push a position.
He's guilty of other rank hypocrisy: demanding that we pay yet another tax after his newspaper received a tax cut while the rest of our small business taxes were increased.
He's guilty of wanting to bury us under billions of debt for a bridge and loot rail that we do not want, do not need, and cannot afford.
He's guilty of slamming bloggers when THIS blogger has scooped his exulted rag on a few major stories, namely the fake Baird death threats, the Bittner arrest,and the Jon Russell, fake college degree scam.
He's guilty of demanding "civility" that he uses whenever HE feels like it, all the while unleashing his pit yorkie of an editorial page editor, my mentor, John Laird, who taught me everything I know about attacking opponents to an agenda.
He's guilty of a MASSIVE democrat bias in endorsements.
He's guilty of continuing to lie about the rag's lack of bias.
He's guilty of censoring and banning those from commenting on the paper's frequently pathetic efforts to slant the story... and an institutional failure to include the opposition to his positions in the paper.
He's guilty of shilling the lie that replacing the bridge will "ease chronic congestion."
He's guilty of failing to understand and seek out the opposition to his bizarre views on the massive waste of a bridge replacement until the level of hatred towards his view became so overwhelming he COULDN'T ignoring it any more.
He's guilty of running what amounts to fake polls and using their pre-ordained outcomes to support a false conclusion.
He's guilty of full-out public relations and damage control efforts on behalf of those he supports, such as rehabing Brian Baird's image after Baird's fake death threat, Nazi, Brown Shirt nonsense; a long term project that ultimately failed for him.... and that he continues in his efforts to rehab Leavitt over his months long, multiple lie-campaign on tolls.
He's guilty of shilling Baird's bogus 72 hour scam, never once holding him accountable for routinely violating his own rule.
He's guilty of failing to hold Baird accountable for voting on bills he hadn't read.
He's guilty of attacking the veracity of bloggers when his own is MORE than under question, like he did Koski over his paper's failure to report on Baird's bogus death threat nonsense.
He's guilty of failing to hold Tim Leavitt accountable for his fraudulent election and subsequent lies.
He's guilty of using double standards in endorsements: one moment, talking about a candidates experience or the lack thereof, the next moment, not even mentioning that experience, like they did in the Mielke-Brokaw race... as he endorsed the completely IN-experienced Pam Brokaw... twice.. over experienced candidates... who happened to be, you guessed it, Republican.
Coincidence, to be sure.
He's guilty of supporting a corrupt, gerrymandered C-Trans vote, both in the past and in the future, where tens of thousands of us will be cut out of the vote... but not paying the tax... all while his paper enjoys the largess of the democrats he supports so strogly and often through the B&O tax cut they're still working under.
He's guilty of failing to hold candidates who don't bother to vote, even thought THEY'VE been elected (Leavitt) or those who have NEVER voted (Janet Seekins, Van Nortwick's opponent) accountable in any meaningful way.
He's guilty of using this blog as a source for stories, and then failing to credit the blog or me, or link to this blog as the source.
He's guilty of protecting Jim Moeller by refusing to remind people that Moeller (and his unbelievable arrogance) authored the moronic "some things are, some things aren't" candy tax, destroyed at the polls last November.
He's guilty of using the Storro story as a campaign piece for TV Tony Golick.
He's guilty of attempting to professionally destroy Brent Boger, Peter Van Nortwick, and, well, me.
Brancaccio is guilty of a long list of crimes to this community. And to that list, sadly, we can add theft, as he works to steal our money to pay for his ballpark under nebulous crap like that published in his despicable propaganda sheet that would put the fricking Nazi's to shame.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment