Saturday, December 19, 2009

The sickening politics surrounding Herrera: "Long on style, short of substance.”

.
The fake outrage over the inaccurate remarks about Republican Opportunist Jaime Herrera is just another of the reasons why I've left the party.

It's not that I agree with Pelz's remarks. When he said "'Herrera is “'Palinesque'" and called her “'long on style, short of substance,'” even THAT was an exaggeration.

Herrera has neither style nor substance. And she's not fit to carry Palin's luggage.

I'm surprised that Pelz gave her so much credit.

And this nonsensical garbage that these remarks are somehow "sexist" just goes to show how utterly clueless Herrera supporters actually are.

There was NOTHING "sexist" about that description. Inaccurate? Yes, because it gave Herrera far too much credit.

Sexist?

No way.

While Pelz's description on the style and substance front DOES accurately describe that empty suited, anti-American racist bigot running the White House, there was nothing sexist about it. The GOP'ers know this; Fredi Simpson SHOULD know it, but the fact she doesn't is just one of the reasons why I worked so hard to keep her out of the party chairmanship.

But I have referred to and described our president in far worse, more accurate terms; and none of them could be labeled "sexist."

We have a long road ahead of us. Far more and far worse will be said about Herrera before this is over, a great deal of it from this blog. And when I back my positions with facts, to call them "sexist" is to call those making the allegations "moronic."

Herrera is frighteningly shallow, a person shoved in here for the greater glory of Cathy McMorris-Rogers; a person who, for example, when appointed, refused to keep the legislative assistant, Loreen Pier on the job because she was "too old."

Giving credit where it's due, I completely agree with Pelz here:
In an interview Thursday, Pelz said, “I stand by my comparison. Jaime Herrera is a political novice and a right-wing Republican, and I think she has a lot in common with Sarah Palin.”

Pelz also said: “I compared her to Sarah Palin, and the Republican Party apparently thinks that’s an insult, so they must not think much of Sarah Palin.”

The moronic, scatter-brained response to this observation is precisely what Pelz was hoping for. He played Simpson and Herrera like fish, hooked through the nose, and this was the best they could do?

Is it any wonder the democrats own this state?
.

No comments: