The lead off line explains it all:
Really? Gee, from all of your efforts to save this moron from himself, we'd have never guessed that.
The guy's a democrat. In open seats, you only endorse democrats. YOU endorsed THIS clown, and you'll CONTINUE to endorse him and support him as long as he runs.
Face it, Lou, you'd dive into a vat of hydrochloric acid before you'd endorse anyone running against Baird, this eyewash notwithstanding. Anyone else in the seat would be likely to ignore your agenda... and you can't have that.
"Baird isn't stupid. Quite the opposite. So there really is something else at play here."
What's at play is he, like you, have been infested with the Obama bug. Both of you wrongly believe that you can support any leftist deal you want. With Baird, he thinks he can FINALLY show his true, cowardly leftist colors.
So he is.
Instead of merely calling on him to take YOUR advice (as if it's better than anyone else's) you SHOULD be demanding the Cowardman's resignation.
But if Baird turned out to be an axe murderer from Pawtucket, Rhode Island, you'd STILL support this clown.
You're such a leftist that you can't help it. And while I get that you can't help it, while that may excuse YOU, it doesn't excuse your continued employment at the paper.
Treat Baird the same way you'd treat a Republican.
Somehow, I think the tone and tenor of this column would be quite different then warm, fuzzy pap you spewed today.
No comments:
Post a Comment