A simple solution for Sen. Mark Kelly's act of sedition.

All he has to do is hold a press conference wherein he would demand of the President and SecWar his immediate recall to active duty so he could request a court martial.

For him, there's no down side.

If he's correct.

Politically, his demand would be explosive. It would either force the President or SecWar to make a decision to act, or force them to shut up about it. Failing to act is an act by itself.

If they refuse, then he can claim he and the other Scumbag 7 (I made Sen. Gallegos an honorary member) were right and the President was merely posturing and playing games.

What does he and his fellow fringe-left nutjobs have to lose? What's the worst that can happen? What possible downside can there be?

If he's correct.

If he faces a court-martial and is convicted... well... That might be bad.

Very bad.

But hey, since leftists believe Sen. Kelly's got nothing to worry about, then what's the hold up?

Put your money where your mouth is, Senator.

If you've got the guts. @MarkKelly @ElissaSlotkin @JasonCrow @ChrisDeluzio @ChrissyHoulahan @repGoodlander @senrubengallego

When a mass shooting doesn't fit the narrative: where's the description of the shooter(s)?

A day or so ago, there was a mass shooting at a birthday party in Stockton, CA, where 4, including 3 children, were killed in what authorities are claiming was a targeted attack. Additionally, several were wounded. There were several witnesses.

Authorities claim it was a "a targeted shooting."

The shooter(s?) are still at large. Authorities insist they're doing everything they can to track the shooters down.

Are they?

So... where's the description of the shooters?

Doing everything they can except provide a description? Or police sketches of those pulling the trigger?

There's nothing out there beyond the height (5'6") and one of the shooters was wearing black pants?

Why is that?

They obviously know more. They likely have cell phone video of those involved (they seem to conclude there may have been more than one) yet they've released no pictures and no video of the incident.

How come? How does keeping the pictures/description of the shooter(s) secret increase the chances of finding him/them?

If the shooter(s) were white, they'd already have videos, pictures and posters up. We all know that.

"Doing all they can" does not include keep the identities of those involved in this horrific crime a secret.

Why?

This article is an example: Stockton mass shooting: Manhunt underway after 4 killed, 11 injured at child's birthday party

Why would you put out an article about a "manhunt" with no description of WHO you're "manhunting?" KCRA3?

Stockton Police Department?  Stockton Mayor Fugazi? California Governor Gavin Newsom?