What happened to THESE democrats warning us about illegals?

A minute long video of democrats... Clinton, Schumer, Reid, Jordan and closing with Clinton, warning us about illegal aliens and claiming we have to put a stop to illegal immigration.

That was then, of course.

This is now.

How quickly the open-borders left forgets.

All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected, but in every place in this country,  are rightly disturbed by the large number of illegal aliens entering our country 

Our immigration policies are a shambles. Plain and simple, and right now our borders are amazingly porous to people who shouldn't be here such as terrorists, drug smugglers, etc. 

If you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. citizenship and then we wonder why we have an illegal immigration problem.

Unlawful immigration is not acceptable.

We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws that we have seen in recent years and we must do more to stop it. 

Washington Secretary of State, Steve Hobbs, whines about efforts to require proof of citizenship to vote.

One of the DNC media outlets in Portland, KATU ran a Facebook post with the byline: 

Voting fraud is incredibly rare, and there have been 15 cases of noncitizen voting in Washington between 1982 and 2025, according to Secretary Steve Hobbs.
Horseshit. Hobbs claimed "15 prosecutions on cases" that are known.

What about the unknown cases? How could he possibly know if illegals are voting or not?

It's not like they write on their ballots, "I'm an illegal."

See, here's the total weakness of the case put forward by fringe-left scum.

How is this clown going to tell the difference between a legal vote and an ILLEGAL vote, PARTICULARLY WHEN HE NEVER LOOKS? Particularly when he NEVER CHECKS?

Prosecuting rioting leftists in Portland for the last 6 years? "Incredibly rare."

Well, that must mean rioters never attacked anyone. Never burned anything. Never looted anything. Never assaulted police or the feds. Never damaged or destroyed anything. Never blocked traffic. Never violated noise ordinances. Never vandalized anything.

Right?

Prosecuting shoplifters in Portland?

Essentially unheard of.

Well, hell... that MUST mean shoplifting is "incredibly rare" and that it's not really any kind of issue.

Right?

I mean, if you apply his "reasoning" to illegal voters, i.e., few prosecutions equal "not a problem," then you must also apply it EVERYWHERE ELSE.

Must mean all of the stores that closed because of theft, and all of the items locked up in cases in stores and locks on merchandise in the remaining stores are unnecessary.

Right?

But leftist liars in the media never do that. No mention of that sort of "incredibly rare" occurrence.

I wonder why?

I get leftist media isn't concerned about illegal voters (well, as long as they vote PROPERLY) but because leftists do not WANT proof of citizenship TO vote, that effectively means anyone in either Washington or Oregon, for example, can do it.

And to suggest they aren't is insane.

Further, if it's so rare, then why do fringe-leftists fight so hard against proving citizenship? What other alternative do they offer? Or is it, obviously, that they WANT illegals to vote?

After all, if it's "incredibly rare," as you leftist politicians assert, how could requiring proof of citizenship make any difference in actual voters voting?

The harder fringers like Hobbs fight against efforts to prove citizenship, the more obvious it is that they WANT illegals to vote, just like Obama did back in 2016 when he famously said that even if illegals voted, they typically can't be caught... an open invitation.

In the end, the claim that "prosecutions are incredibly rare" is utterly meaningless and just another effort by fringe-left pols and their media lackies to blow smoke up our asses as they insist on demanding that we accept that 2+2=5 and math is racist. The main questions Hobbs needs to answer are simple: Does he WANT illegal aliens to vote in our elections? (of course he does) And if he says "no," then what does he intend to do to make sure they don't, followed by, why hasn't he acted to implement that plan (which he does not have?)

My polider (political+spider) senses are beginning to tingle.

 Promises are being ignored in the name of political expediency. The last administration used the same "justification."

During the campaign, a variety of pledges were made. Among those were the release of the Epstein List (which certainly does exist) the removal of all illegal aliens (which the majority of the entirety of this country supports) and ending military aid to Ukraine (which I have vociferously opposed on these very pages)

Among other promises.

Here's the reality as I see it: on the matter of illegal aliens, we either want to end the problem, or not.

Like pregnancy, one either is, or one isn't. There's zero middle ground.

There cannot successfully be a carve out for illegal farm workers.

We cannot, as a country, begin to classify illegals based on the illegal hirings by companies breaking federal law to reduce prices.


Hiring an illegal for any job violates federal law. 8 U.S. Code § 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens and 8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens is specific in that regard.

If the United States is to ever end, or at least severely curtail the illegal alien issue, then the elimination of the illegal alien destination resort we've built must be Job 2 after Job 1, locking down the Border.

That resort includes the waste of hundreds of billions of dollars spent by government and paid for by US, that continues to draw illegals like flies to honey.

To permanently control the influx of illegals, every effort should be made to eliminate any reason they would come here to begin with. At the top of this list, second only to the massive waste of billions on illegal alien welfare programs, is a "job." or any variety of employment.

Trump's development of a carve out is a "camel's nose under the tent flap" approach to governance. Any such program, rule or law will always, ALWAYS result in a gradual mission creep as OTHER illegals are added to some sort of "critical" job set.

It will become a justification for the left to defend ALL illegal alien/open border policies as the merely point to what appears to be an exception for "some," but not for all. It's a matter of time before an increasing number of job classifications would be added to such a list of illegal alien employers to justify their continued exploitation of those who have zero legal right to have ever set foot in to this country.

And yes, I have noticed the reality that to date, illegals are arrested/deported while those hiring them suffer no apparent ill-consequence of any kind.

What kind of message is that sending to employers who's business model depends on the illegal hiring of illegal aliens?

Ending the issue of open borders, illegal aliens and criminal activities they engage in was one of the biggest platform planks Trump used to get elected. As were the release of Epstein List, which this nation's attorney general claimed at one point was "sitting on her desk", as well as the ending of aid to Ukraine (which, I reiterate, I STRONGLY oppose)

Tap dancing on this issue for ANY reason is unacceptable. It's handing the left a major wedge issue, it's short sighted and while Trump abhors the "amnesty" term in reference to this select group, at base, it appears that no other noun seems to cover the root action.

Amnesty: the act of an authority (such as a government) by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals.

What other term applies? People are watching. And people are noticing. And many are getting pissed.

Immigration, Epstein, Ukraine: Trump’s moves roil MAGA base

The LA rioting circus.

Watching the leftist riots in LA, the thought occurred to me that leftists generally and elected democrats ALWAYS excuse/justify these riots, never holding those actually engaging in burning, looting and assaulting responsible, always siding with those same rioters and always lending at least tacit approval of those riots by blaming others generally, and Trump, et al, particularly, as if he is responsible for every fire, every police officer injured, every bit of vandalism and all destruction resulting from the actions of the political allies of those in charge.

Why not blame the rioters? Because elected democrats see them as political allies. Burn buildings, block freeways, assault police officers, fail to hold rioters accountable? That's the democrat standard de jour as we observed all too frequently during the THREE MONTHS of unfettered riots in the Oregon capitol of leftistism, Portland. 

Newsom, for his part is not making demands of the rioters. In fact, Newsom's latest debacle is to placate his rioting political allies by wasting additional taxpayer dollars to sue Trump for deploying federalized troops in his formerly great state. Since he supports them, he's shifting all the blame to Trump, as if that abrogates his responsibilities as governor.

It doesn't.

Those in charge all took an oath to enforce the laws of their respective cities and their state. Yet, they're doing essentially nothing to enforce that oath or those very laws.

Instead they whine and snivel and blame Trump for doing what HE is REQUIRED to do.... and they then blame those brought there to enforce the law instead of blaming any of those responsible for breaking it.

Count on the left to continue to be supportive of the scum rioting. Count on them to staunchly defend the 20 in the 80/20 equation on issues the American people do not support.

As usual, ala their Tesla debacle, leftist politicians either remain silent or come out directly in support of those who would damage, burn, loot and assault, using the arrest and round up/deportation of those who have no legal right to be here and who, in many instances, have shown a proclivity to use our laws as toilet paper generally and then, once here, engage in every conceivable crime from murders on downwards, specifically.

Those in leadership on the left have proven their disregard of their constituency by fighting harder to return an illegal alien criminal to the United States than they fight for the safety and the rights of those same criminal's victims.

And how does the left respond?

Well, the Governor of California is far more concerned about the presence of federalized National Guard troops in his state than he is over the actions of those that were the cause of their deployment in the first place. His latest political kabuki theater? Suing Trump for the obviously needed deployment of Guard troops.

The democrat’s political priorities have ben screwed up for years. Doubling down on those priorities to the determent of the people they're in office to protect (which does not include illegal aliens, BTW) will not improve their standing at the polls, where it matters most.

Supporting the abhorrent, hate-based criminal activities of their supporters will not avail them the success they so desperately seek based on the blood and destruction they so obviously foment and crave to achieve their political agenda.

Yet, that is precisely what democrats are doing here... never allowing a serious crisis to go to waste. Meanwhile, they continue to provide support and assistance to their illegal alien voter base in violation of federal law as they directly aid and abet illegals violating the laws of the United States.

This is them, doing that.