Why can't women figure this out? (fake women athletes...)

The people making the most money off  the insanity of fake women polluting women's sports have put out a new informercial.

It's not on YouTube as yet, so this is the best I can do for now:  

It shows a variety of adults doing adult stuff, advocating for what I believe is the only sane response to the stupidity of fake females being given the same consideration as the real thing:

I responded to it thusly:

When you KEEP DOING THE SAME THING, OVER AND OVER, WHILE EXPECTING A DIFFERENT OUTCOME, WHAT IS THAT CALLED?

Insanity.

Here's the thing.

You can take control of this situation now... and END it NOW... or you can continue to get your asses kicked for however many more YEARS it will take to fix this through channels.

You can continue to have men in your locker rooms. Men on your teams. mean invading your spaces and taking your awards for YEARS to come.

OR... you can stop it RIGHT, FRICKING, NOW.

This is not what is "right". If it was about what is "right," you'd never have had to face this insanity in the first place.

The question now is how do you deal with TODAY'S REALITY?

Wishing, hoping, praying, waiting for a system that acts like you're pushing a string AIN'T GONNA CUT IT.

You do you. But don't try and play victim of a system YOU ALLOW TO EXIST.

Nope. I'm done.

ONLY WOMEN control who is involved in women's sports.

No one else. And I'm done supporting a profit-based cause whining about women's sports when women could end it all in one day.

YES, it will suck. YES, it will hurt.

BUT NOTHING ELSE WILL GET IT DONE.

And you damned well know it.

ALL women/girls have to do is simply refuse to play with or against fake women. Forfeit. Walkaway

You know it. I know it. Everyone reading this knows it.

And instead of whining about men not doing what you want them to do, you never advocate for what women have the power to do NOW as WOMEN control this entire issue.

Why?

Not because you want to see this succeed.

But because if it DID succeed, it would destroy your T-Shirt/Hat swag sales.

In fact, I'm getting sick of your incessant whining because you fail to focus on the one indisputable fact you have ignored:

WOMEN control this issue. No one else.

ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE"S MONEY TO BE MADE OFF THE SWAG.

And buying your stuff hasn't/won't change anything.

How many more years to you want this to go on, The Riley Gaines Show Riley Gaines?

I have ALWAYS been opposed to males invading female sports.

But I've also watched people take advantage of this situation... not to change any of it.  But to make bank off of it.

XX-XY Athletics is one such company.

And as a result, it's not in THEIR best financial interests to accomplish the stated goal of allowing ONLY biological women to engage in women's sports and spaces.

There's HUGE money to be made. And this company is making it with their swag

XX-XY Athletics has seen revenue growth in 38 countries. (There does not appear to be any company valuation or revenue figures available. And I get why that is.)

Their stated goal is:

At XX-XY Athletics our mission is to empower female athletes and take a stand for fair competition.

But that tends to beg the issue.

What happens to the company if their goal is ever achieved?

 Is it in the company's best interests to keep things as they are?

Or is it to achieve their stated goal?

With "fairness" actually achieved, why would anyone buy their branded products?

They wouldn't.

As I stated above:

ONLY WOMEN control who is involved in women's sports.

No one else. And I'm done supporting a profit-based cause whining about women's sports when women could end it all in one day.

YES, it will suck. YES, it will hurt.

BUT NOTHING ELSE WILL GET IT DONE.

And you damned well know it.

ALL women/girls have to do is simply refuse to play with or against fake women. Forfeit. Walkaway

You know it. I know it. Everyone reading this knows it.

And instead of whining about men not doing what you want them to do, you never advocate for what women have the power to do NOW as WOMEN control this entire issue.

Why?

Not because you want to see this succeed.

But because if it DID succeed, it would destroy your T-Shirt/Hat swag sales.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out what XX-XY Athletics refuses to point these faces out... instead, sending out what is presumably a teen aged female demanding "Maybe more adults could stand up for us?"

I spent 35 years in politics. I long since learned the difference between "Motion," and "Action."

And this company does not, in any way, believe in "Action." They do little to nothing to actually ACHIEVE their stated goal.

And while the reason(s) are obvious, it's clear that their main motive isn't their stated goal of female athletic empowerment.

It is, instead, profit.

Profiting off the pain of women who encounter the sickness of fake females invading their lives while most authority doesn't care or actually supports that invasion.

There's money to be made in pain, ladies and gentlemen. 

So, let's skip the actual, only realistically available cure of surgically ending this charade and keep the pain going.

THAT should become their mission statement, because THAT is what they're doing.

When are the fringe-left governments of the left coast going to start their mandated redistricting at both the state and legislative levels?

Race-based districts at both the congressional and legislative districts are de jour in Washington, Oregon and California.

The Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v Callais, et al 608 US__ (2026), which, in brief, states:

§2 of the Voting Rights Act imposes liability only when the evidence supports a strong inference that the State intentionally drew its districts to afford minority voters less opportunity because of their race.

There is no doubt that the vast majority of congressional and legislative districts within these three states were based PRIMARILLY on racial make-up.

Most recently, here in the Washington Soviet a federal Court ordered the redrawing of 3 districts in the Yakima area ENTIRELY for race-based reasons.

The case in question, Palmer et al v. Dobbs et all and Trevino et al, CASE NO. 3:22-cv-05035-RSL,  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE, was decided by the obvious misinterpretation of the Civil Rights Voting Act, Sec 2, when the court held that:

For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the boundaries of LD 15, in combination with the social, economic, and historical conditions in the Yakima Valley region, results in an inequality in the electoral opportunities enjoyed by white and Latino voters in the area. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in plaintiffs’ favor on their Section 2 claim.

Clearly, given the Supreme Court's recent order, at minimum, the Court's decision in Palmer was made in error and should be subject to immediate recommitment to the prior redistricting the Court subsequently overruled.

At the congressional level, the 7th District, which comprises mainly of  Seattle from the Snohomish County line south to Normandy Park, inclusive of Vashon Island, is 55% white. District 9, which is mainly covering Bellevue west to south Capitol Hill south to Federal Way and Pacific, is 50% white. District 1 extends south from Arlington through east of Everett to Northern Bellevue, 58% white.

Washington State itself is 63.1% white, which indicates the likelihood that racial components were used in these districts.

ALL redistricting decisions based on race are subject to strict scrutiny. And, in fact, ALL redistricting should be reviewed for compliance with the Supreme Court's decision.

The questions are when and how much will the Ferguson Regime obstruct the Court's decision?

Quick reminder on the local CRC/IBR loot rail scam: By POLICY, they didn't WANT public input and completely ignored it on the CRC... just like they are now on the IBR loot rail scam.

Of course. The entire thing is a scam to infest Clark County with TriMet's loot rail.

Or so said the Oregon Supreme Court:

The answer, according to the court: The massive Interstate 5 bridge and freeway project is a "political necessity" to persuade Clark County residents to accept something they previously didn't want—a MAX light-rail line from Portland to Vancouver. (To read the Feb. 16, 2012 Oregon Supreme Court decision regarding the Columbia River Crossing Project, click here: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/or-supreme-court/1608702.html

They didn't have to "persuade" the citizenry. And they never did.

In fact, they planned to IGNORE US ALTOGETHER, EXACTLY LIKE THEY ARE NOW:

Except from the CRC Memo: Columbia River Crossing: Project Sponsors Council Roles and Responsibilities

Two Money Quotes:

1. I assume that each PSC member would be briefed in advance of the decision meetings by senior staff of their organizations. Senior staff is responsible for providing requested information and responding to questions. It is expected that each of the PSC decision meetings would result in a decision with no need for extended deliberations in future meetings. This approach would require extensive coordination among PDT members prior to the meetings.

The decision meetings would be open to the public, but only minimum legal notices would be provided and no display advertising would be placed. We would not encourage public participation. The Task Force chairs would be expected to attend and respond to PSC questions concerning the Task Force recommendations. Task Force members would be made award of the meetings. Meeting notes would be prepared and posted on the website.

and:

2. Non-decision meetings should be treated as opportunities for the PSC members to advise the PDT on key issues. No “official” decisions should be made at the meetings. No public notice would be provided and Task Force participation would not be sought. Meeting notes would be prepared but not posted on the website (the same as RPG and working group meeting notes).

Rest assured, the scum ramming this garbage down our throats no more care about public input, or the public generally now, than they did then.

And they didn't THEN by ACTUAL, WRITTEN, POLICY.

Nope. There was no more persuasion on this scam, then nor now, than the Soviets persuaded women to be assaulted when they took Berlin in World War Eleven.

All they had to do was buy the scum in Washington State and local government.

How to get the SAVE Act passed.

Administratively change the current identification requirements get any Welfare benefits; Section 8 housing, SNAP benefits, food stamps, alcohol, cigarettes, schooling, mortgages, drivers licenses (or any license of any kind) student aid, college admission, financing for any loan or any health care, bank accounts and the like.

Require the same ID the SAVE Act requires to get any government benefit of any kind, and to make any age-limited purchase.

A lot of that can be done without congressional approval through the regulatory process.
Or, in the alternative?  Pass the SAVE Act.

Those opposed to the SAVE Act are, effectively, telling us that if these additional programs required SAVE Act ID, millions more people would be starving, homeless and totally without health care, schooling, loans, bank accounts... you name it.

Which is a crock.

Those needing that ID to get those goodies would walk thru fires and walls to get it, and opponents damned well know it.

There is no excuse for opposing this law, save one: leftist politicians believe the left benefits from illegal voters. Period.

Anything else is horseshit eyewash.

Today's quiz question: when does the state of Washington implement the Supreme Court's decision to get rid of racially drawn districts... like those Clinton appointee Judge Robert Lasnick, a federal district court judge rammed down our throats generally and 12 Republican districts specifically, getting rid of a Hispanic lawmaker representing a then mostly Hispanic district in the process who only happened to be Republican?



The two main districts involved (in the Yakima area -14th and 15th) are not, of course, the only state or federal actually racially gerrymandered districts in this state. So the questions is what... and when... and if... the legislature intends to do anything about it; or once again, do they intend to ignore Supreme Court decisions they disagree with?

I say "if," since the left, which dominates politics in this state in part due to the unconstitutional application of the Voting Rights Act, frequently views state and federal Constitutions as their own personal roll of toilet paper... and it is likely those same leftists will do everything they can to ignore what congressional scumbag Congressman Hakeem Jeffries calls an "illegitimate" court… mainly to give license to all leftist entities to ignore this decision to the maximum extent possible.