Showing posts with label spending. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spending. Show all posts

Thursday, June 05, 2025

Is Trump screwing up with TBBBA? (Big Beautiful Bill)

Sometimes, a Republican Congress can be just as bad as the democrats. This bill is one of those times, I believe.

Uh oh.

I've got a hard time dealing with vote-buying. I condemned Biden's vote-buying efforts with his student loan scam, I condemned Sideshow Bob Ferguson’s unemployment for striker’s vote-buying scam and now I'm going to condemn Trump's vote-buying effort of $5000 for each steel worker.

Picking out certain segments of society to benefit with cash payments over every other segment is, IMHO, an unjustifiable vote-buying scam no matter who does it... or which president is in office.

We are staring at a $37 trillion dollar deficit that no one in government seems to care about. Musk and his gang discovered several billion dollars of waste, fraud and abuse yet oddly, that money doesn't seem to be much reflected in what has become known at TBBBA, aka, The Big Beautiful Bill Act.

The Administration has taken a lot of heat over Musk's effort, and Musk, rightly, points out that TBBBA doesn't seem to reflect much of any of it. Musk is standing on principle, the principle that he, like many of us, believed that Trump also shared... Now? Now they trade threats. Trump threatens to cut Musk's contract. Musk threatens to end supply rockets to the Space Station.

What was the point if the budget Trump is advocating doesn't seem to reflect much, if any, of what Musk and his group discovered?

Is it coincidence that Musk is exiting government the day after expressing his concerns over a budget which, by itself, will increase the deficit by between $2.4 trillion and $3.8 Trillion? And what about follow-on budgets and that inevitable deficit spending?

This is not, I believe, how government is supposed to run. It wasn't for Biden. And it isn't for Trump.

That is not to say the entirety of the bill sucks; on the contrary, it has a lot of good stuff in it, kinda like every budget that preceded it.

But a huge part of Trump's platform was to get deficit spending under control. This is not him, doing that.

I, for example, appreciate $5000 as much as the next guy. But how is this justified? Right or wrong, it's not going to be an expenditure appropriated by Congress.... so why was it, legally speaking, bad when Biden did the same kind of thing for student loans, but fine for Trump for steel workers?

I think this is a mistake. I think it hands an issue to the democrats who are masters of class warfare and who now find themselves in a position to point out that certain segments of our society outside the billionaire class are being picked as winners while others are left to wonder: why steel workers and not us?

I can't explain it with a straight face. And this action fails that test.


Sunday, December 13, 2009

Many thanks to senate democrats for helping to bury the next several generations in even MORE debt:

.
I just makes me feel warm and tingly all over that the socialists are bankrupting us.
December 13, 2009
Posted: December 13th, 2009 03:28 PM ET

Washington (CNN) - The U.S. Senate on Sunday approved $447 billion in spending for several Cabinet departments and other agencies for the 2010 budget year - money needed to fund the federal government after the coming week.

On a mostly partisan vote of 57-35, the Senate approved the compromise omnibus spending plan worked out with the House, which passed it last week. The measure now goes to President Barack Obama to be signed into law to succeed the previous funding resolution that expires December 18.

The vote occurred in an unusual Sunday session as the Senate worked for the second consecutive weekend in a push by the Democratic leadership to complete work on a sweeping health care bill and also get the appropriations bill passed.

The omnibus bill, which combines six separate appropriations measures, provides money for for non-defense government agencies including the departments of Transportation, State Department, Veterans Affairs, Commerce and Justice for the fiscal year that started October 1.

A separate defense spending bill is expected to be considered later this week.

More