So, when do we go to war with the rest of the Middle East?

.
One of the many problems with having an Empty Suit, either in Congress or in the White House, is that when they don't have a clue, nothing they say makes sense and their leadership simply cannot be trusted.

We have that in our congressional representation, and we have it in the presidency.

I've read Obama's speeches and comments.  I've reviewed where Biden said he would personally lead the charge to impeach any president who, well, did what Obama just did: take us to war without asking Congress first.

The problem is that the empty suited, anti-American racist bigot in the White House has no clue.  He has no experience.  He has no idea what the hell he's doing.

So when you hear him speak, you can replace the word "Libya," with the word "Syria," or "Bahrain" or "Yemen," or, well, Iran.

And what, exactly, are we doing in those countries?  They are, essentially, doing the same things to varying degrees.

Why are we staying out of Syria but jumping in to Libya?

Could it be... Oil?

Maybe.  But I'm suddenly reminded of Defense Secretary Gates words here:

"There are American national security interests and American vital interests where, in my view, we need to act decisively and if necessary act unilaterally," he says. "This is not one of them."

Then... why are we there?

And what stops us from going somewhere else?

If we had ANY confidence in our leadership, we might... just might... buy into the "it's a good idea" justification.

But it's no better to risk our lives and blow hundreds of millions of dollars we cannot afford in Libya then any of the other places mentioned above... places doing the exact same thing as Gaddafi... just at a lower volume, more difficult to hear.  And just another quick question: al Qaida has joined the rebels.  What are we going to do about that?

And we have no confidence in our leadership.

They've lied too much, ignored us too much, insulted our intelligence too much.

So, when do we start blowing up the rest of the area?  Because if we're justified in doing it here... and clearly, we are not... then we are justified in doing it everywhere else we feel like it.

And oddly enough, I don't believe that's what the left hired this moron to do.
.

A recent, illustrated history of democratian hypocrisy: Jim Jacks compared to an auto accident

.
Most anyone reading my blog is aware of the Jim Jacks debacle. Some level of his rampant misconduct in Olympia concerning female staffers and alcohol at a minimum and the democratian's cooperation with the democrats; who, through tax breaks, own that rag like they use it to mop up oil in a garage... and their not even subtle efforts to bury this eisode, covering for both Jacks and democrats.

From the comment section of the lame article the democratian settled for:

And then, we go over to an article about a tragedy on I-84:  Names released in fatal I-84 crash

What do we find?

Rampant "speculation" about the DEATHS of innocent people in a car wreck.

So... how come it's OK to speculate about the deaths of people in a car wreck... but it's somehow NOT OK to speculate about the TRAIN WRECK of a political career, now shot down in flames?

We know why.

This rag is doing everything they can to protect Jacks and the democrats.  After all, who cares about speculating on the tragic deaths of innocent people when speculation must be avoided all at all costs when the perp is Jim Jacks and a democrat.

Not so much when it's Jim Dunn or Richard Curtis and a Republican.

Hypocrites.

La Center city government, a wholly owned tribal subsidiary.

.
Irish finally gets his wish.

Jim Irish has been in the tribe's pocket since this issue was first raised, several years ago, so the irony of the headline "La Center, Cowlitz tribe leaders eager for talks" is difficult to get past... since "talks" between that criminal enterprise and Irish never stopped... even when the city council ordered that no contact take place.

Irish's desire to sell out his community and Southwest Washington appropriately centers around sewage... and that's what this deal will be: so much sewage.

The tribe has a history... a history of lies, exaggerations, intimidation. And this guy and the government they obviously own are "eager" to negotiate with proven thugs? Out of state and out of area people who have spent hundreds of thousands to buy local elections, a group of people who will not have to live in the cesspool of traffic, social service and housing needs that THEY are going to require to economically rape US?

And when this issue loses in court... and it WILL lose in court (One rarely succeed by ignoring a Supreme Court decision) when Interior's nonsensical decision is overturned? Then what?

If this fiscal whorehouse is built, and they demand to use ALL of the sewage capacity, leaving none for development out at the junction.... then what?

It's all kumbiyah right now. But the vultures working for the tribes are professionals... Irish and his band of children? Not even rank amateurs.

La Center is about to get its pockets picked clean. And what will these fine people do when they wake up and find their city gone? Who will they blame then?
.

Here's where Rob McKenna lost me: "Collective bargaining (for state workers) is a right."

.
 No, Rob... it isn't. And if you win, it won't be with my support... as if that mattered anyway.

On Other Blogs Today Seattle Times: Republican McKenna Says Collective Bargaining is a Right

By Josh Feit Thursday, March 24, 2011 at 2:21 PM 18 Comments and 0 Reactions Democrats have linked Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna to the anti-union reign of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker with murky lines such as: “His friends in the Legislature have introduced bills to eliminate collective bargaining rights for state workers.”

But Seattle Times reporter Jim Brunner interviewed McKenna last night and got this:

In an interview before the King County GOP’s Lincoln Day dinner in Bellevue Wednesday night, McKenna said he would not replicate Walker’s attempt to undo collective bargaining rights.

“Collective bargaining is a right. It’s not the problem. The problem is politicians who give away too much at the bargaining table,” McKenna said.

If he does get elected governor, McKenna said he’d work with unions, rather than “terrorizing them.”

Collective bargaining, or "collective extortion" as the taxpayers call it, is, of course, NOT a "right."

Public employee unions are not a right, so, of course, anything connected to those unions is not a "right."

Clearly, McKenna will sell us all out to get elected. Public employee unions and their democrat puppets have buried us in debt, with unfunded retirements, pay and benefit increases in the midst of a horrifric recession, law suits to keep screwing us, and a failure to even pay a fair amount for health care premiums. Our income goes down, and our taxes go up. And Rob seems OK with that.

You read it here first, just like you did for Dino.
.

Barbie writes a letter.

.
I spit up coffee all over my keyboard when I read the first line:

I was not elected to Congress because of my foreign policy experience.

This must amount to the political understatement of the decade.

You weren't elected because of ANY experience you have, foreign policy or no. Ever since you looked me in the eye and told me that your extended absense from the district you should never have been allowed to represent in the legislature... your time of parties, and internships and jobs that scrupulously avoided the private sector was the same thing as serving in the military.

It wasn't. But that's when I knew you were unfit to hold office.

You HAVE no experience, knowledge, or education worthy of election. You've never worked in the private sector, never owned a business or a house, never had a family... in fact, when it comes to the experience issue, you've never had a job save a minor, $3200 per month staffer for McMorris.

What you have had is a knack for being in the right place at the right time, and an amazing ability to lie.

You ran a campaign modeled after Obama's in every detail: he had no experience worthy of the presidency (and haven't we suffered because of it?) you had no experience worthy of even being a state representative, let alone a member of congress. He had no specifics, because if he had, he would have been destroyed at the polls. You had no specifics because you're an empty headed, vacuous egomaniac who actually believes she's EARNED whats been handed to her on a silver platter.

He has a history of fringe left, union thuggery, you have a history of fringe left, union thuggery. He lies. You lie.

Our nation is trillions in debt, and you fuss about a paltry $10 billion cut when we must have hundreds of billions in cuts, showing that you have NO IDEA of the depth and breadth of the trouble we're in as a Nation.

I don't give a damn what you think about going to war. In reality, your utter lack of experience, knowledge, or vision concerning ANYTHING military when we had a veteran with Defense experience we COULD have elected just points out what a colossal error in judgment you manipulated the voters into.

Millions of people in this country have forgotten more about the military in one day then you will EVER know. And as for foreign policy, the newest Infantry private in Afghanistan has more foreign policy experience then you will ever have.

Further, sending out a letter that someone else has obviously written while you put your name on it does nothing to increase confidence in your complete lack of experience or vision. And frankly, if you had any conscience at all, you would resign and let someone else who has experience, education, knowledge and a record of achievement take your place.

But then, this isn't about serving your country, is it, Babs? Because if you gave a damn about that, you would have worn a uniform and put your ass on the line for it. But that would have kept you from the parties and your multiple, few week internships that made up the length and width of your professional accomplishments... and we can't have that... can we?

That you were elected our congresswoman is the primary reason I have done all I can to keep my son out of the military. Because if the decisions effecting his life are going to be made by people like you and your hero Obama, then he should have nothing to do with it.

And no amount of op eds written by someone else and signed by you can fix that.

Cross posted at Jaime Herrera Watch.
.