Looking for another reason to despise RINOs and the Establishment? Here ya go!

EconomyNews

First Senate Appropriations Bill Passed Spends MORE Than Obama Requested

Philip Wegmann / @PhilipWegmann / May 12, 2016 / 36 comments

The Senate just passed an energy and water appropriations bill that spends millions more than President Barack Obama requested. (Photo: Yuri Gripas/Reuters/Newscom)

The U.S. Senate’s first spending bill of 2016 spends more than President Barack Obama requested and lacks significant conservative amendments, but it still sailed to passage in the Republican-led Senate Thursday.

An overwhelming number of U.S. senators on both sides of the aisle approved the energy and water development appropriations bill by a vote of 90-8. Conservatives had objected to the higher spending levels and lack of policy riders in the weeks leading up to the vote.

In the end, it didn’t seem to matter.

It’s a victory for Republican leadership and an initial step toward achieving their goal of funding the federal government by passing 12 appropriations bills.

Moving legislation and avoiding fights has been a top election year priority for Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. The Kentucky Republican wants the GOP Senate to prove that Republicans can govern by avoiding a one-and-done omnibus spending package at the end of the year.

But the energy and water bill received little fanfare from Senate conservatives. They complain that the measure, which funds the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Interior, spends $261 million more than even Obama requested.

Sen. Mike Lee described the legislation as “simply unacceptable in a time of rising debt and slower economic growth.” The Utah Republican told The Daily Signal that “we’re never going to get our nation’s rising deficits under control until we can stick to our previous agreements on spending levels,” referring to the limits set in the 2011 Budget Control Act.

Though Congress has not passed a budget resolution, the Senate started advancing spending bills at levels established in the 2015 Bipartisan Budget Act, which increased government discretionary spending by $30 billion above the 2011 caps.

Still Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., told The Daily Signal he’s glad the appropriations process has gotten off the ground finally.

“This is the first time this appropriation bill has passed the Senate since 2009,” Lankford, who sits on the Senate Appropriations Committee, explained. “To avoid last-minute continuing resolutions, backroom deals and omnibus bills, we must move bills through a regular order appropriations process.”

The bill’s passage also marks a victory for Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Senate Democrats who have labored to keep appropriations bills “clean” of controversial policy riders.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., almost thwarted that effort. His amendment would have barred the federal government from using funds allocated in the spending bill to purchase heavy water from Iran, a key component to the production of a nuclear weapon.

For weeks Democrats blocked the bill, calling Cotton’s amendment a nonstarter that would undercut Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran and automatically trigger a veto.

“The White House had very strong feelings and indicated they would veto this bill if it passed with this amendment,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif, said Wednesday. “How do we start an appropriations process with the presidential veto in the wings?”

To bypass the blockade Republican leadership scheduled a vote on Cotton’s amendment, setting the threshold for passage at 60 votes. It fell just short by a 57-42 vote Wednesday.

Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Alexander were the only Republicans to vote against the amendment. Neither responded to multiple comment requests by The Daily Signal.

After Wednesday’s vote, Cotton withdrew his amendment for further consideration, allowing the appropriations bill to move forward. Though he expressed frustration at his amendment’s failure, the Arkansan thanked both Alexander and McConnell “for working with me to make sure that we have the Senate on record on this very important issue.”

Other conservatives were not as charitable in their assessment, grumbling that McConnell allowed Democrats to procedurally outfox Republicans.

GOP leadership hamstrung Cotton’s measure, a senior conservative Senate aide told The Daily Signal, when McConnell didn’t fight to have the amendment considered as germane, ensuring it would fail.

According to Senate rules, an amendment only needs 51 votes to pass if it is germane, meaning that it is directly relevant to the underlying legislation up for consideration. Under this standard, Cotton’s bill could have passed.

“McConnell said the ‘Senate is open for business’ and if you’re a K Street lobbyist of Democrat interest group that’s definitely true,” the aide said. “But Harry Reid and the Democrats have made it abundantly clear that conservatives policies will not be tolerated in the appropriations process.”
Don Stewart, McConnell’s spokesman, dismissed those allegations as unfounded.

Democrats, not the Republican majority leader, defeated the amendment, he told The Daily Signal. In fact, Stewart noted, McConnell worked with Cotton and even used his parliamentary privileges as Senate leader to advance the amendment.

But by keeping the Senate from ending debate, Democrats stopped the chamber from recognizing the amendment as germane, ultimately killing the measure.

If any conservative aides were unclear on that Senate procedure, Stewart said, “They should just come to me or the cloakroom. We’d be happy to explain any rule they aren’t familiar with.”

Still, the conservative aide complained, this isn’t the first time a conservative measure wasn’t treated as germane and therefore didn’t qualify for the lower 51-vote threshold. A similar episode occurred two weeks ago ending an amendment that would have thwarted the Environmental Protection Agency’s controversial Waters of the United States rule.