Did Brancaccio swing by and drop offf a little sumfin?

My earlier post:  Brancaccio's Benton fetish: Lou, you need help, likely garnered a response from Brancaccio's biggest fan... himself:

Me thinks that whoever writes this blog has a short dick syndrome. How could you write so much nonsense? Wouldn't it be more productive to give your opinion on why this guy Benton is the right person for the job? I bet you would not have the courage to say what you write in front of the people you attack so cowardly. You need and ounce of humility and a pound of maturity. You sound very angry. Me thinks that the problem is in your head. There must be a serious battle between your ears. No doubt! Turn this attitude around. Try at least. Show your contempt with ideas, with well founded opinions. Try harder, you are failing miserably.

Like most who stop by to tell me how, what and when to write, the content was anonymous.

See, here's the thing, Lou.  You don't mind if I call you Lou?

There is precisely and absolutely one person I write this effort for: me.

Rule 1 around here is this: if you don't like how or what I write, then feel free not to read it.

Rule 2 aroun d here is that if I need your advice, I'll ask for it.

Rule 3 is that when you write shit like this, at least be man enough to sign it.

Your IP is 67.182.131.225, shouldn't be too difficult to track down.

But the"dick" thing goes to your "fetish" thing: hardly fit for a family blog.

Here's the thing that you, apparently, don't get: The justification that matters is that the commissioners have the authority to hire anyone they want for a management position, even people you don't like.

But then, you knew that.  And that's the only justification they need... and that's good enough for me.

In fact, I have no difficulty telling any of these people what I think of them in any way imaginable.

Further, every single person I go after knows exactly who I am and how to contact me directly.

It's my policy that anyone of the subjects of my analysis can feel free to comment unedited... as long as they identify themselves.

Which leads me to the irony of your little effort here:

"I bet you would not have the courage to say what you write in front of the people you attack so cowardly."

Since you failed to sign your name, I would venture to say that the cowardice here is a problem you seem to have... not me.

And, of course, the fact is that you have offered absolutely nothing to refute anything I wrote.

So, if you might consider taking your own advice, and show YOUR contempt with ideas, with well founded opinions instead of this sort of babble.

This is, of course, the last time you get published here without a verifiable name.

But I occasionally put examples of stupidity, hypocrisy and anonymous cowardice up to reiterate this blog's policy.  And it must have some impact since it's read by people in the US Senate, US House, and the Washington State legislature just about every business day.

Not bad for a "miserable failure."

On second thought, it's probably not Brancaccio.  He, at least, rarely sinks to 3rd grade grammar.