Unfortunately, Clark County is cursed with a lowlife GOP party chair with the integrity and character of an MLK hooker.
We just recently got rid of a self-delusional narcissist when he finished 8 horrific years as president. He babbled many things during and after his horrific term in office, but one of THE most outrageous things that waste of skin has said to date is this:
This article points out a mere 18 or so.
In fact, among other nicknames this clown has garnered is the descriptive "Davey Delete" because he was known for brutally attacking his opponents and then, having been humiliated by the facts, making his lies simply disappear by simply deleting his many attacks against those wise enough to call him out.
But he HAS been accused of 4 counts of Theft 3. He HAS been accused of failing to appear in court and he HAS had to deal with warrants for his arrest as a result.
He HAS been accused of multiple counts of DUI.
After all, do mug shots take themselves?
And the "I've never been evicted for failing to pay rent (or any other reason?)"
The fine folks at "Riverstone Residential West, LLC" may take a different view: an eviction lawsuit based on nonpayment of rent, case number 09 205630 1 filed in Clark County Superior Court, alleging Theft was behind in his rent in 2009 for a total of $2,150 tends to, well, cast a different light on Theft's claims. Theft did a pretty good job of avoiding service, simply by, allegedly, refusing to answer the door.
Ultimately, the rent finally got paid. But Theft would have the casual observer think that no effort was ever made to get him evicted. The record indicates that such is not the case.
Not that Theft, such a sterling fellow, would EVER post something not absolutely truthful, right?
And THAT was such fun that less than a year later, they had to do it again: Clark County Superior Court number 10 2 03417 3.
Having shown the pattern that has served Theft so well in handling party legal issues, a default judgment against Theft and others was entered when they simply failed to show up. $3,900.88 for unpaid rent and various other fees.
Theft, BEING Theft, filed suit against Holland Residential in Small Claims Court, for $5000.
The grounds?
That Holland "Purposefully filed false information on (his) credit and refus(ing) to correct it. Damaging (his) credit rating, costing (him) a great deal of time and money."
The suit was tossed, of course. That's the nature of the beast.
Now, clearly, Davey has had issues. Here, he holds himself out to be as pure as the driven snow, so to speak.
Much of his other fanciful self-flagellation has nothing to do with much of anything. His expenditures of Party money may be somewhat more problematic.
Odd, that:
Apparently, Brent Boger (who is an attorney) takes a somewhat different view:
How confusing.
He sticks to a great many numbers... Was it $74,000 or $51,000? Did he lie to the executive board when, as I understand it, he told them he would appear at the AG lawsuit and then failed to do so?
He ends his babbling by claiming he "... has never made ridiculous false allegations and slander... (which is an outright lie, of course) which landed (him) in court."
Well, the idiotic case HE filed against Colwell doesn't provide cover for Theft; he's lied about and slandered others, including me, on numerous occasions. That it wasn't worth suing him over?
Since he's got nothing to pay, what good would it do?
And then this idiocy:
The irony of Crain carrying this scumbag's water is hard to overstate, given that Theft feed me information to trash her with. It almost seems like the political version of domestic violence: Theft beat her up to me, and she still supports the guy doing the beating.
For her part, clearly Crain is even more delusional than Theft.
And anyone reading this can see that Obama and Theft have the exact same mindset when it comes to their actions.
Nothing bad that's happened is their fault. They're both completely innocent. They're both victims. Overwhelming evidence to the contrary... neither of them did anything illegal or, for that matter, even wrong.
And in Theft's case, he's spent a thousand percent more time trashing conservatives than he has his leftist, democrat buddies... which is zero time at all.
And frankly, instead of doing his best to shatter the party base, isn't going after the democrats what he's SUPPOSED to be doing? Instead of wasting all this time trashing a PCO, shouldn't he be spending more time trashing democrats?
One wonders: what has he done FOR Republicans... instead of TO Republicans?
We just recently got rid of a self-delusional narcissist when he finished 8 horrific years as president. He babbled many things during and after his horrific term in office, but one of THE most outrageous things that waste of skin has said to date is this:
"We didn't have a major scandal that embarrassed us"Is it possible the worst president this country has ever known actually believes that?
This article points out a mere 18 or so.
President Obama and his mouthpieces have embarked on a bizarre scheme to hypnotize America into forgetting the many scandals of his presidency. They seem to think that intoning “this administration hasn’t had a scandal” over and over again will make history disappear. It’s the lamest Jedi Mind Trick ever, and is being pushed on people who know Star Wars is just a movie.Obama also said, at major fund raiser in California:
Speaking to donors at a private fundraiser in California, Obama railed against former House Oversight Committee Chair Darrell Issa for calling his administration corrupt.
“Here’s a guy who called my administration perhaps the most corrupt in history — despite the fact that actually we have not had a major scandal in my administration,” he said, referring to Issa, according to a transcript of his speech.
And when he hasn't been babbling that nonsense, his posse has been mouthing the words:
Sunday on CNN’s “Fareed Zakaria GPS,” President Barack Obama’s close friend and longtime adviser Valerie Jarrett said, “The president prides himself on the fact that his administration hasn’t had a scandal.”Sadly, this is the pattern favored by Theft 3. Yesterday, on Facebook for example, he portrayed himself as being as pure as the driven snow.
"And since being made aware of that rule, I do my best to abide by it."Which, apparently is his effort to excuse his past conduct of lies, exaggerations, misstatements, character attacks... the list is endless.
In fact, among other nicknames this clown has garnered is the descriptive "Davey Delete" because he was known for brutally attacking his opponents and then, having been humiliated by the facts, making his lies simply disappear by simply deleting his many attacks against those wise enough to call him out.
 |
| Smile, Davey! |
"I have never been accused of GRAND theft, larceny, or embezzlement by any reasonable human being" (my emphasis added)Seriously.
But he HAS been accused of 4 counts of Theft 3. He HAS been accused of failing to appear in court and he HAS had to deal with warrants for his arrest as a result.
He HAS been accused of multiple counts of DUI.
After all, do mug shots take themselves?
And the "I've never been evicted for failing to pay rent (or any other reason?)"
The fine folks at "Riverstone Residential West, LLC" may take a different view: an eviction lawsuit based on nonpayment of rent, case number 09 205630 1 filed in Clark County Superior Court, alleging Theft was behind in his rent in 2009 for a total of $2,150 tends to, well, cast a different light on Theft's claims. Theft did a pretty good job of avoiding service, simply by, allegedly, refusing to answer the door.
Ultimately, the rent finally got paid. But Theft would have the casual observer think that no effort was ever made to get him evicted. The record indicates that such is not the case.
Not that Theft, such a sterling fellow, would EVER post something not absolutely truthful, right?
And THAT was such fun that less than a year later, they had to do it again: Clark County Superior Court number 10 2 03417 3.
Having shown the pattern that has served Theft so well in handling party legal issues, a default judgment against Theft and others was entered when they simply failed to show up. $3,900.88 for unpaid rent and various other fees.
Theft, BEING Theft, filed suit against Holland Residential in Small Claims Court, for $5000.
The grounds?
That Holland "Purposefully filed false information on (his) credit and refus(ing) to correct it. Damaging (his) credit rating, costing (him) a great deal of time and money."
The suit was tossed, of course. That's the nature of the beast.
Now, clearly, Davey has had issues. Here, he holds himself out to be as pure as the driven snow, so to speak.
Much of his other fanciful self-flagellation has nothing to do with much of anything. His expenditures of Party money may be somewhat more problematic.
He has, he claims, "never failed to appear for a court hearing" (which, of course, he HAS: the judgment in Case Number 10-2-03417-3, one of the eviction cases, clearly states "no appearance by Judgment Debtors" as the basis for the case outcome.
And yes, I recognize that he qualifies his bogus claim by writing "thereby allowing a default judgment to issued against an organization for which (he) was the principle fiduciary."
Really?
Odd, that:
Apparently, Brent Boger (who is an attorney) takes a somewhat different view:
"I cannot defend anyone ever allowing entry of a default judgment in a judicial proceeding. I am critical of David Robert Gellatly for that.Odd that Theft claims he hasn't done what Boger claims that he HAS done.
How confusing.
He sticks to a great many numbers... Was it $74,000 or $51,000? Did he lie to the executive board when, as I understand it, he told them he would appear at the AG lawsuit and then failed to do so?
He ends his babbling by claiming he "... has never made ridiculous false allegations and slander... (which is an outright lie, of course) which landed (him) in court."
Well, the idiotic case HE filed against Colwell doesn't provide cover for Theft; he's lied about and slandered others, including me, on numerous occasions. That it wasn't worth suing him over?
Since he's got nothing to pay, what good would it do?
And then this idiocy:
The irony of Crain carrying this scumbag's water is hard to overstate, given that Theft feed me information to trash her with. It almost seems like the political version of domestic violence: Theft beat her up to me, and she still supports the guy doing the beating.
For her part, clearly Crain is even more delusional than Theft.
And anyone reading this can see that Obama and Theft have the exact same mindset when it comes to their actions.
Nothing bad that's happened is their fault. They're both completely innocent. They're both victims. Overwhelming evidence to the contrary... neither of them did anything illegal or, for that matter, even wrong.
And in Theft's case, he's spent a thousand percent more time trashing conservatives than he has his leftist, democrat buddies... which is zero time at all.
And frankly, instead of doing his best to shatter the party base, isn't going after the democrats what he's SUPPOSED to be doing? Instead of wasting all this time trashing a PCO, shouldn't he be spending more time trashing democrats?
One wonders: what has he done FOR Republicans... instead of TO Republicans?
No comments:
Post a Comment