A quick quiz for Lou Brancaccio. So Lou, what's it mean when an organization like ICC (aka Identity Vancouver) has a speaker like Jim Jacks?

.
It wasn't that long ago that local media bully sprayed a few hundred gallons of ink my way by attempting to hurt Ann Rivers by beating her over the head with me.

A classic case of attempting to infer guilt by association.  In fact, that punk was so enamored about his one-sided mud-slinging that I rated two consecutive weeks of his babble.  Later, he was loading up to crucify Brent Boger the same way, but stupid enough to tip his hand, and he was beaten senseless as a result.  Naturally, he ran away with his tail between his legs, having FINALLY crossed the line.

That brings us to this situation: the ongoing democratian cover-up of the escapades of a drunk, serial harasser by the name of Jim Jacks.

Jacks was a state representative invited to get his ass out of the House of Representatives most-riki-tik because of his final straw shattered over the back of a camel last St Patrick's Day.

While Jacks has publicly confirmed he has an alcohol problem, he has never publicly disclosed the extent of his misconduct with female staffers in Olympia.

The Columbian is well aware of the misconduct in question, but they hide behind the lack of a paper trail due to Frank Chopp's well-orchestrated cover up of the whole thing.

Jacks, of course, lied about his departure in ways that are, in fact, easily verifiable.  But when you don't WANT to report the truth, you wind up like our local rag... ignoring it.

I bring all this up because I stumbled across a YouTube presented by Lew Waters.

This is it, showing yet another step of Jacks' image rehabilitation.  We can, no doubt, expect more in the future.



As mentioned, this was Jacks in front of an organization he was, and perhaps still is, a part of: Identity Clark County.

If Ann River's association with me was such a huge negative... what does that make ICC's association with a drunk who harassed women he worked with?

I'm guilty of writing a letter 16 years ago.

I'm guilty of writing letters to the editor using a fake name to protect the Rep I was working for.

I'm guilty of failing to live up to Brancaccio's standards when it comes to this blog.

And most important of all, I'm guilty of opposing most of what the democratian writes and most of their agenda... the horrific and unneeded bridge replacement/loot rail that they won't be paying for... Moving the Yakima Millionaires over here at taxpayer expense so they can earn money off our backs, etc.  I have, perhaps, taken the rag and those working for it to task 100's of times for their lies, exaggerations, insults and belittlement.  Also, I'm not a leftist.  Because if I were as rabid in SUPPORT of the democratian's crap as I am in opposition, we never would have heard a word out of Lou about little ol' me.

The result?  Brancaccio tried to hammer me like a nail.

Jacks is guilty of breaking the law.

So... what difference does all of this make to the democratian?

Here, Lou, let me save you the trouble: it makes no difference at all.

See, when a "friend of Lou's" gets stupid... that's different.  The standard is different.  The mindless, robotic water-carrying by Jacks when it came to the democratian's agenda... is different.

Ann was somehow bad because I support her candidacy and her election and her service to our community.

Again, what does that make Identity Vancouver?

Does that mean we'll see a kind of drunk column where Brancaccio trashes THEM?

Hardly.  As an organization, they could commit armed robbery and Brancaccio wouldn't utter a peep.

Because well, that's how he rolls.

And, apparently, that's how ICC rolls.  And Brancaccio?

From him, we'll get nothing.
.