The hilarity of the bankrupt democratian telling us what's good... or not.... about "cutting costs."

.
Few things in life can be more hilarious then a corrupt, bankrupt company telling others what's good... or bad... about finances generally, and cost cutting specifically.

The rag has made it their mission to bury us in debt for upcoming generations for a bridge and loot rail that we do not need, do not want, and cannot afford.  Their bankruptcy, which unfortunately, didn't put them under,

For these people, these Loot Rail Weiners, to even comment on "saving money," considering the billions they want to extort from us on the bridge, and the millions they want to extort from us to subsidize their ad revenue stream from the ballpark for the Yakima Millionaires... both without a vote, you understand (If the Chief Loot Rail Weiner, John Laird's words are to be judged... and their arrogance and belittlement ARE judged.)  and not to mention their recent and most spectacular bankruptcy, is to have an Obama tell us how to fix the economy: a laughable, moronic joke.

Of course, the main reason for this column isn't to talk about the relatively speaking, chump change savings of $300,000.  The main reason is to do a puff piece on Mike Ciraulo, Battle Ground Mayor and The Next Big Thing.

After all, they've go to have something to replace serial drunk and sexual harasser Jim Jacks and Ciraulo fits the bill.

He's carried the rags's water precisely like Jacks, has done nothing to block the loot rail scam and has remained silent on the ballpark rip off.  Others are tainted by their record of lies on loot rail and the bridge, such as Leavitt and Stuart.  As damaged goods, well, no amount of image rehab will be able to cover their perfidy.

So, that leaves fellow democrat Ciraulo... who is mentioned in this column with glowing terms... though he really did nothing to merit it.

The hillarity of it all.

So, what they're doing is a little early campaign puff piece.  We can expect many more to come.

In our view: Cutting Costs

Local governments react to Great Recession; different strategies are necessary

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Some strategies in response to the Great Recession fall in the category of “Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!” Others are more like, “Well, gosh! Guess we have to hunker down and do the best we can with what we’ve got left.”

A good example of the first is the recent decision by three fire departments to consolidate their training programs for a combined savings of $300,000. Such a tactic — relying on economies of scale — should apply in all economic conditions, and it’s good to see savings reinvested in other fire-protection services and programs that have been put at risk during the all-too-slow economic recovery.

.