The idiocy of the Democratian's snivel about election counts taking too long.

.
Clearly, a brain damaged idiot wrote today's snivel and whine fest in the Democratian.

On one hand, the rag babbles incessantly, giddy over their support of the least secure method of voting available today. Of course, they maintain silence about any effort to make that system more secure. You know, like requiring proof of citizenship to register and of address to vote? Simple, common sense requirements like that?

They do all that to make it as easy as pie for as many people (legal or not) as possible to vote.

Then they come along and hold up the moronic Oregon system that cuts out thousands of votes every year because of the arbitrary, election day cut off.

So, on one hand, these idiots want as much participation, legal or illegal, as possible. Then, on the other hand, they want to disenfranchise military voters and others by thousands... just like they are in Oregon.

Oregon is a slow-motion train wreck. Holding them up as something, anything, we should aspire TO instead of something we should be running away FROM shows just how high the level of idiocy is required to be able to write this kind of editorial pap.

Waiting a few extra days... making sure that as many LEGAL votes as possible are actually counted... isn't going to kill the morons running the Democratian.

Advocating a policy that could very well result in the same kind of stupidity that happened in Illinois, where thousands of military ballots did not count in this last election, is just that: stupid.

The rag's differentiating between the handling of military ballots by making them privileged to come in after the deadline and still be counted does nothing to address their whiny, sniveling little issue.

I want military votes to count. But I don't want them to count any more then anyone else's... and taking it a step further, if military ballots will count after the deadline, then the elections STILL won't be settled, effectively keeping the very goal these clowns are whining about from being achieved.

I really don't care what Sam Reed, arguably the worst elected official in the United States today has to say. Quoting him justifies nothing.

Reed's entire tenure has been spent avoiding his responsibilities vis the issue of felon voting; insuring the citizenship and address of voters, and making sure that elections follow the law (See Rossi - 2004)

This is the money quote:

Kimsey says changing to Oregon’s system would “reduce the amount of time it takes to confidently predict the outcome of close races by one or maybe two days. If a contest is extremely close, it doesn’t matter whether the Oregon or the Washington system is used. The outcome won’t be known until the election is certified, or even longer after recounts or any challenges in court.”

Then why change it?

In a "close race" we might save a couple of days?

Big whoop.

Look, I know and the rag knows that the reason to do this is essentially to reduce the impacts of the traditionally right breaking late ballots. The rest of this pap is smoke and mirrors.

Their desire is to disenfranchise GOP voters by keeping as many as possible from voting. You know... like they do in Oregon?

To the Democratian, I do offer you this alternative: You think their loot rail and election system is so fricking superior?

Then feel free to move your asses over there. We're much better off without you.
.