A day or so ago, there was a mass shooting at a birthday party in Stockton, CA, where 4, including 3 children, were killed in what authorities are claiming was a targeted attack. Additionally, several were wounded. There were several witnesses.
Authorities claim it was a "a targeted shooting."The shooter(s?) are still at large. Authorities insist they're doing everything they can to track the shooters down.
Are they?
So... where's the description of the shooters?
Doing everything they can except provide a description? Or police sketches of those pulling the trigger?
There's nothing out there beyond the height (5'6") and one of the shooters was wearing black pants?
Why is that?
They obviously know more. They likely have cell phone video of those involved (they seem to conclude there may have been more than one) yet they've released no pictures and no video of the incident.
How come? How does keeping the pictures/description of the shooter(s) secret increase the chances of finding him/them?
If the shooter(s) were white, they'd already have videos, pictures and posters up. We all know that.
"Doing all they can" does not include keep the identities of those involved in this horrific crime a secret.
Why?
This article is an example: Stockton mass shooting: Manhunt underway after 4 killed, 11 injured at child's birthday party
Why would you put out an article about a "manhunt" with no description of WHO you're "manhunting?" KCRA3?
Stockton Police Department? Stockton Mayor Fugazi? California Governor Gavin Newsom?
No comments:
Post a Comment
If I cannot identify you, then your post will be deleted.
No threats (Death or otherwise) allowed towards me or anyone else. If you have allegations of misconduct, they must be verifiable before I will publish them in comments.
Enjoy!