When democrats, as they all too often do, get stupid:

Originally published June 7, 2014 at 2:58 PM | Page modified June 7, 2014 at 6:34 PM

• Share:
  Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on linkedin More Sharing Services 
• Comments (98)
• E-mail article
• Print

Was public railroaded in trail deal?

Government officials said they bought the Eastside rail corridor for use as a trail, but it turns out that wasn’t quite true. Now the courts are making them pay substantially more for it — at taxpayer expense.

By Danny Westneat

Seattle Times staff columnist

RELATED

• Eastside property owners sue over proposed power-line route

READER COMMENTS

HIDE / SHOW COMMENTS

Just remember when you vote on all the new tax levies coming this year- this mistake by King County would have covered... (June 7, 2014) MORE

Maybe Stoel Rives law firm should put up the $35M fee. "Nobody could have imagined" the easement issues? Evidently... (June 7, 2014) MORE

Thanks a lot Ron Sims and Kurt Triplett. Not only did you destroy a working railroad and family wage jobs that serves... (June 7, 2014) MORE

Read all 98 comments

Post a comment

Six years ago, King County and Port of Seattle officials gathered in front of the Wilburton railroad trestle in Bellevue to announce what they said was a historic purchase.

They were buying a rail corridor along the Eastside from BNSF Railway to convert it to “the granddaddy of all trails,” as then King County Executive Ron Sims called it. They also hoped to run commuter trains on the tracks someday.

Officials for the two local governments fist-bumped on that May 2008 day as the sale papers were signed. The deal cost taxpayers $81 million.

Except there was a huge red flag in those papers — a sizable legal caveat that was glossed over in pitching the deal to the public:

“Port and County acknowledge and affirm that BNSF may not hold fee simple title to the Property, that BNSF’s interest in all or part of the Property, if any, may rise only to the level of an easement for railroad purposes,” the contract read. “Port and County are willing to accept the Property on that basis.”

Meaning: The railroad didn’t own a lot of the land. For parts of the line, it was selling only the right to run a railroad. Nothing else.

“In a sense the railroad sold them the Brooklyn Bridge,” says Tom Stewart, a national plaintiffs lawyer.

As a result, last month the federal government agreed to pay out a huge settlement, $140 million to 253 property owners along the Eastside rail line from Renton to Woodinville. The money is compensation for using their land for the planned hiking and biking trail. A whopping $35 million of that goes as a fee to the lawyer, Stewart.

More: