More Columbian Laird idiocy.

(FULL DISCLOSURE: I have not and likely will not be endorsing in this race. I freely admit that I am totally opposed to Marc Boldt's re-election since he's completely sold out to the left, forgotten/ignored GOP principles, supports the CRC scam in it's entirety and wants to hang tolls around our neck for the next several decades that will destroy a great deal of small business in Clark County as a result.

NO candidate or campaign or anyone involved or in any way concerned with any candidate or campaign was aware of or approved or had input into this post.

Further, Marc Boldt is my brother in law, and I worked for him as his legislative assistant for 6 years while he was in the state house.)

As the Columbian continues to act as Marc Boldt's campaign arm, did you ever notice how they have no problem linking to the, I outed her 18 months before the Columbian did, left wing pap of Temple Lentz... but would rather dive into a vat of boiling hydrochloric acid before they'd link to, say, Lew Waters or me?

I actually like Lentz.  Who can forget Lentz's reaction to Brancaccio's hissy-fit?

“Dear Lou, Go F* yourself.”

I've been hammering Marc Boldt like a nail.  Purely in the interests of fairness, the democratian doesn't wonder why Boldt's own brother-in-law opposes his re-election... and certainly wouldn't dream of mentioning my opposition to his continuance in office.

But let a leftist use something as stupid as harpooning a candidate because they self-finance?  You know, like many on the left do?  (And, of course, no mention of Joe Tanner's self-funding.  He's a democrat, of course, and that's "different.")

And it gets top billing in that fringe-left whack job's sewage pipe.

So, let's take a look at something that REALLY matters... Laird's CRC fetish.

Hinton asks his online visitors: "If you wanted to make Clark County a better place and you had ten billion bucks to spend, what would YOU buy?"

He offered these choices:

• 500,000 years of tuition and books at Clark College?

• 400,000,000 backpacks of food for hungry kids through Share's backpack program?

• 3,000 years of overnight shelter and food for 744 individuals at the Winter Hospitality Overflow shelter?

• A vanity political campaign that emphasizes lies, ignores facts and wants to screw the people?

MUCH better.

Laird goes on to ask "Why would any registered voter in Clark County choose to live elsewhere?"

Well, scum like you and Brancaccio play a part in that.  The damage you and your fellow fringe-leftists cause would be reason enough, and I actually look forward to leaving this rat hole you slime are building.

And then, Laird goes on to move the numbers any old way he wants:

Taking back those insults to the 47 percent — On Thursday, Mitt Romney said he was "completely wrong" to proclaim that 47 percent of Americans "believe that government has the responsibility to care for them … believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing," and that "I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

On Friday, CNN reported statistics from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, that for tax year 2011, "if payroll taxes are counted, the number of nonpayer households drops precipitously to an estimated 18 percent."

Turns out Mitt was right … that he was completely wrong.

As a fringe-left whack job, lies by Obama and his ilk are perfectly fine... because you will NEVER see this putz hold Obama accountable... for ANYTHING.

That said, in response to his idiocy above:

"if payroll taxes are counted, the number of nonpayer households drops precipitously to an estimated 18 percent."

If frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their asses every time they jump.

Obama has lied... repeatedly... about a wide variety of crap.  And we have yet to see this leftist moron bring ANY of it up.

And, he ends with this complete lie:

Pot meet kettle — When a Democrat leads in the polls, liberals revel in the wisdom of the people while conservatives assail the polls' flawed methodology. When a Republican leads in the polls, conservatives revel in the wisdom of the people while liberals assail the polls' flawed methodology. Meanwhile, leaders of both parties wonder why so many Americans remain independent.

That it's a lie is obvious.  The methodology REMAINS "flawed."

The problem isn't that Romney is actually ahead in the polls: he was likely ahead all along.

The problem for the politically stupid, inept and incompetent like Laird is that even WITH the "flawed methodology," Romney now SHOWS as being ahead... which means that he's likely much further ahead than even THESE polls show.

So, as much as Laird fantasizes about his unsupported assertions, the reality is something quite different.

But then, when have reality and Laird ever occupied the same space simultaneously?

This rag simply cannot go bankrupt fast enough.