Calling Obama's foreign policy a trainwreck is to do a disservice to train wrecks everywhere.
His mishandling of our foreign affairs even exceeds his documented and obvious incompetence on the economy.
The multiple lies, the numerous failures, the negligence... all of that begs the question:
Why is it this idiot has time for Lettermolester and Whoopsy... but not world leaders?
Chris Wallace Asks Obama Adviser 'President Has Time for Whoopi Goldberg But Not World Leaders?'Instead of another multi-million dollar taxpayer paid vacation, maybe this clown could spend a night in a Holiday Inn Express.
By Noel Sheppard | September 23, 2012 | 10:22
Fox News's Chris Wallace on Sunday asked senior Obama campaign adviser Robert Gibbs an absolutely delicious question about the current White House resident's schedule.
During a Fox News Sunday interview, the host said, "The President has blocked out time to appear on The View on Tuesday. So, he has time for Whoopi Goldberg but he doesn’t have time for world leaders?" (video follows with transcript and absolutely no need for commentary):
CHRIS WALLACE, HOST: I want to go back to the UN though and New York this week. You say that he’s got schedules, that foreign leaders have schedules. But the President has blocked out time to appear on The View on Tuesday. So, he has time for Whoopi Goldberg but he doesn’t have time for world leaders?
ROBERT GIBBS, OBAMA SENIOR CAMPAIGN ADVISER: No, Chris. Look, the President is going to be actively involved at the UN General Assembly.
WALLACE: He’s not meeting with any private leaders. He's giving a speech.
GIBBS: Chris, they have telephones in the White House. Last week, he talked to the President of Egypt. He talked to the leader in Libya. We don't need a meeting in Washington just to confer with leaders. We’ve got a strong...
WALLACE: But he does need the time to be on The View?
GIBBS: We have a strong diplomatic – I’m sure if he was doing an interview with you on Fox News, you’d have no problem with that.
WALLACE: Well, he hasn't, but that’s not the point.
GIBBS: I’m sure that’s not the point. No, look Chris, he’s got a strong schedule. He’s actively involved.
WALLACE: You don't have a problem with the fact that he’s not meeting with any world leaders, but he’s going to appear on The View?
GIBBS: I have no problem with that, because, Chris, you’re the President of the United States every minute of every day.
You know, so he could learn how to be president?
"World leaders" is code for Netanyahu. I don't want Obama meeting with that bully any more than I want him meeting with Ahmadinejad.
ReplyDeleteI not only don't so talking points, I don't do code.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure that being president entails doing all sorts of things he'd "rather not do."
When he's not playing golf or wasting millions on a vacation, that is.
Bibi, I'm sure, would likely rather dive into a pool of hydrochloric acid then talk to this clueless waste of space. But it comes with the territory... and Whooper should get in the way of that?
I'm sure Obama would rather chat with the Muslim Brotherhood. But it appears their brand of "bullying" is OK with you?
In this instance, I'd have some modicum of respect for that clown if he'd just come right out and say he's throwing Israel under the Arab bus instead of dicking around with Whoopy.
But then, this is the same guy who claimed the terrorist attack on Benghazi was a result of that video, right? So I'm sure his priorities are in order.
I mean, after all, shouldn't a president be proud of everything he does?
Honesty and Israel seem to be incompatible - no one says the truth in public:
ReplyDeleteChristian support of Israel is all about The Last Coming, and the Jewish sense of superiority at being God's Chosen People justifies their unconscionable actions.
p.s. If you're pleased Jews are killing Muslims & are going to war with Iran, dude, I just can't debate out there.
Well, there is *something* we can debate...
ReplyDeleteI'm of the opinion that if the U.S. does not get involved, and Israel attacks Iran - Iran will crush them.
That's why Netanyahu wants to hit them before the election - he thinks he can drag Obama in. I wouldn't be on it, Bibi.
Well, what's problematic is your misinformation about Israel's capabilities and your supersizing of Iran's military abilities... which are practically, essentially, non existent.
ReplyDeleteWhat's problematic here is that if the outcome were the "crushing" of Israel, why would that outcome be changed by the election?
Israel can defend itself. Israel can defeat any or all countries in the Middle East. What it's looking to avoid is interference from the Sino/Soviet block.
Relatively speaking, the Iranian Air Force is piper Cubs and biplanes while Israel has the best Air Force on earth.
Israel has the ability to END Iran as as a country. It sucks for Iran, and begs the issue because Iran knows all of this already but that's the way it is.
See, I knew there was *something* on this issue to debate!
ReplyDeleteI'm assuming you'd be okay with the U.S. staying out of it (except for wagging a finger at everyone else)? Good riddance whoever wins.
Achmadinjab today: "Israel sill be eliminated."
ReplyDeletehttp://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/24/us-un-assembly-ahmadinejad-idUSBRE88N0HF20120924
Nope. Israel shouldn't pay any attention to that kind of crap.
They should ignore a budding nuclear power with a total whack job's finger on the button who has publicly made it his mission to destroy them.
Perfect.