Why the democratian jihad against Wulle?

Look; I'm voting for Wulle.

At the end of the day, the democratian's endorsement system is much like that of the Bar Association's: if you're a leftist judge, you're much more likely to get their support.

Wulle's opponent opposes caps on liability, provided campaign contributions for Jay Inslee, Tony Golik, and Sharon Wylie, as well as a pretty fair amount to the Western Washington Trial Lawyer's PAC.

And, well, the democratian is acting like Wulle's opponent is paying them.  Perhaps he ought to file all this as an "in-kind" campaign contribution.

I was sort of ambivalent about the whole thing, really, until I discovered a moronic story where a couple of supporters of Wulle's opponent commented after the latest character assassination by the democratian... on Facebook.

Imagine.  Facebook comments become their own story.

That, combined with Wulle's opponents rather massive PDC violations, and, well, there's no alternative.

Generally, if the rag supports someone or something, the community is best served by opposing that person or thing/project/tax/special interest rip off/downtown mafia hucksterism that the democratian is so enamored of.

So, I hope you'll join with me in supporting John Wulle... because frankly, I don't give a damn that he yells in his courtroom... and I don't see that as a reason to elect yet another leftist.

Just sayin'.