So, Brancaccio continues on with his pattern of demanding that everyone else in Clark County pay for what HE wants... and he lacks the testicles to tell us if he would have his paper be taxed.
I've known for years he's a cowardly bully, and added to that is his rank hypocrisy.
Here's the exchange under his moronic column telling us how great WE will have it as WE pay for the ballpark HE wants but that WE damned sure don't need.
Lou, you're not answering the question. You want this; your newspaper will make money off the advertising. Your sports reporter will cover it.
Are you willing to have your just-as-optional-as-entertainment newspaper taxed to help pay for it? Or is that only for those of us who won't ever go there?
Lou, you have not answered my question either. Would you still be in favor of entertainment tax if this were for a soccer team? Or is this just because you like baseball?
Lou, Would you support a tax on newspapers to fund the building of a stadium?
Mike Briggs said: "It is not practical to have a public vote on every single item of interest for the public"
Yeah, I agree, Mike, ONLY TAX ISSUES!
What a cowardly, gutless, weaselly response.
I guess I shouldn't have a voice or an opinion unless I'm willing to be taxed gto? Silly.
Lou Brancaccio (Columbian Staff) — May 21, 2011 at 1:43 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal ) | Ignore User )
The answer, of course, is NO. He just wants US to pay for his little game palace, just like he wants US to pay for the horrifically expensive, absolutely unnecessary bridge and loot rail... all without asking us.
It's always been so easy for Brancaccio to demand that WE pay for what HE wants.. Now, when HE's asked.... what does he do? He runs away and hides.
Gutsy, Lou... really gutsy.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If I cannot identify you, then your post will be deleted.
No threats (Death or otherwise) allowed towards me or anyone else. If you have allegations of misconduct, they must be verifiable before I will publish them in comments.
Enjoy!