Lou puts up another nonsensical self-serving poll:

.
What a total crock.

Did former Vancouver State Rep. Jim Jacks do the right thing by going public on why he suddenly resigned from office?

Yes. Not only did he have an obligation to do so, most members of the community will rally behind him now. 55% 94 votes

No. As soon as he left office he was a private citizen and had no obligation to tell the community anything. 35% 61 votes

No opinion at this time. 8% 15 votes

170 total votes

It's this variety of self-serving crap that makes Brancaccio ooze the way he does.

It's a variety of "heads I win, tails you lose" questions that, once again, completely ignore Brancaccio's complete lack of journalistic integrity and the fact that he's let Jacks skate like Jacks was paying him. 

The questions Brancaccio SHOULD have asked?

We all know there's much more to this then Jacks has told us; no one resigns and moves out so fast they leave a vacuum behind.

1.  Was I right to violate any tenet of fairness and integrity to let Jacks off the hook so I can cover for him?

2.  Will This paper EVER have any respect for the unvarnished truth instead of just continuing on as a left wing swindle sheet?

3.  Should I have asked him about specific examples of misconduct instead of letting him control the interview and blow me off like a rookie cub reporter?

4.  Should I resign immediately as well?

These questions would save Lou SO much wear and tear on his shoulder from patting himself on the back as if he was actually doing his job, instead of bending over for the leftists... again... like he usually does... keeping the public in the dark on those subjects that make the left look bad... which is most subjects.
.