Democratian continues democrat-slate endorsements.

.
As mentioned time and again, the leftist hacks at the Democratian only endorsed their fringe-left buddies for election in open seats in 2008 and so far, for 2010.

Tony "Union thug" Golik is no exception. Golik, now the subject of a bar complaint investigation for ethical concerns over his mishandling of and use of the Storro case as a campaign prop, is also a union president.

Thus, the "impressive list of endorsements" the rag babbles about is primarily based on unions endorsing a union president. Does the despicable cancer on our local society mention that?

Of course not. "Inconvenient Truths" like that are worthy of mention, because after all, you the reader are incapable of thinking for yourself so why cloud your considerations with full disclosure?

Democrats endorsing democrats. Union thugs, who have sacrificed so little while the rest of us sacrifice so much to keep their outrageous pay checks coming, endorsing a fellow union thug.

The rest of this trash about Golik is smoke and mirrors. Contrary to the rag's endorsement, Golik's use of the Storro case for self-aggrandizement and political purposes only makes him worthy of our contempt... as does the fawning, cloying political ads masquerading as news coverage of this case, where Golik wastes our time, effort and money prosecuting someone perfectly capable of being prosecuted by someone besides a "major crimes" prosecutor.

The rag, of course, doesn't care. Golik is the prototypical, fringe left union hack... democrat.

And to the rag, as the democrat, Golik was the choice from the beginning. Everything else is a justification of that pre-ordained choice, just like the rag's bridge position was their choice from the beginning on the loot rail/bridge project, followed by frequently untrue, inaccurate and outright false coverage designed with one purpose in mind: to support their desire to replace the I-5 Bridge.

This endorsement is no different. Because, I've got to ask myself: when was the last time Art Curtis was in a court room... prosecuting anyone?

The Democratian's endorsement is a lie. It actually takes an administrator with all kinds of experience to be a county prosecutor. And Golik is wholly unqualified for the job.

The Parker endorsement just continues the riff. Sherry Parker has engaged in outright contempt for election law with her completely illegal campaign signs (resembling DOT transportation signs in direct violation of campaign law) and her contempt for the law shows her to be unfit for elective office, given her repeated violations and deliberate failure to follow the laws she is allegedly sworn to, and required to, uphold.

Weber is the obvious choice, if for no other reason then Parker's arrogance. The other reason is that, like Golik, Parker's campaign is financed by union dues... where just over half of the cash she's raised comes from, you guessed it, union donations.

I'm not surprised. The Democratian lacks even a pretense of fairness or a lack of bias. And they are certainly meeting my low level of expectations.
.