Columbian does another piece on Jim Moeller's candy tax; again fails to mention Moeller is behind it.

.
So, the local cancer on our community did another article on Communist Representative Jim Moeller's tax increase which will, of course, make our economy worse while, like the cigarette tax increases, drive SW Washington consumers over the bridges into Oregon to make these purchases.

The idiocy of such a bill is, of course, self-evident. But that's perhaps a subject for another post.

The idiocy of the Pravda Columbian's coverage of that bill and it's implementation? That's why we're here today.

The Columbian has done an editorial "jeering" the tax in question. But in that editorial and today's article, what did they FAIL to do?

Why they FAILED to mention who was behind this tax increase... one Jim Moeller (Socialist-49)

Yeah, this tax is indefensible. Like his buddy Pridemore, there can be no doubt this is an attempt... but only an attempt (there is absolutely no way this tax will raise the projected revenue. People will buy these products in larger quantities in both Oregon and Idaho, or they won't buy them at all. But who ever put reality and Moeller in the same room?) to "balance the budge on the backs of the poor and the powerless."

How they can babble about this tax and its impacts without also naming the idiot behind the whole thing?

Well, they certainly don't want people like me to come along and remind them that they, in fact, have repeatedly endorsed this clown ever since his political shadow has darkened our doorway.

I'm sure it was just one of those deliberate oversights that the rag will set right at some point, aren't you?
.