And what, exactly, do I consider a definition of a Paulbot ?

Well, everyone may have their own definition, but here is mine:

A Paulbot is an individual typically politically ignorant, devoid of situational political awareness, who is completely taken in by the glittering generalities the "Revolution" provides.

A Paulbot seems unable to think for themselves. They appear to be taken in by catch-all phrases that frequently lead them, and those actually leading them, into believing that Paul has a chance to 1. Get the nomination when no such chance exists, and 2. even if nominated, he has better than a snowball's chance in hell of getting anywhere close to elected.

Throughout history, there have been radical fanatics who have been blinded by those with the gift of propaganda: democrats generally, Maoists, Nazis, Soviets and the like... not the rank and file, you understand, but those who manipulated the system so THEY could assume power and control over the very people they're persuading into doing their bidding.  Think in terms of the scum running al Qaida, for example.

In a nutshell, a Paulbot is unable to grasp the reality that Paul has no support, no chance, and no way to get elected, to become the GOP nominee, or to have any impact on the platform.

And that's the problem when your good ideas are simply overwhelmed by the idiocy and insanity of the bad ideas... like voting for gender-based abortion like Paul did a few days ago.

The result? Idiocy such as suing the GOP everywhere, claiming such garbage as "intimidation" and doing all they can to exploit the weaknesses in the system in an attempt to usurp the will of the GOP as expressed at the polls... all the while wrapping themselves with those parts of the Constitution that suit them while ignoring those other, somewhat pesky parts of it they DON'T like.

Conflicting justifications: it's organized, it isn't organized; it's spontaneous, it's planned.

They lie whenever and however it suits them, as long as they believe it gets them closer to the goal. They attack everyone, as they are now in their effort to depose every PCO that disagrees with them, because, well, as innately superior as they believe THEIR political positions to be, why persuade people to a point of view when you can just make an effort to get rid of them altogether?

At the end of the day, Paul has failed to win anywhere. On the local front, he's a later day version of Ellen Craswell... and we all know how well THAT worked out. Typically, his followers show that same level of intolerance, fanaticism and ignorance.

Recently, Lew Waters left a comment on the democratian web page that went something like this: "The only thing dumber then kicking a dead horse is betting on him." This was after the Paulbots were destroyed politically at the state convention.

The result?

Literally HUNDREDS of comments from Paulbots who attacked everything imaginable about Lew, from his age, to his military records, to his family... you name it. And the more I read that crap, the more I despised the reason for them and the man who causes people who follow him like Christ to act this way.

And yes, the turncoat Santorum types who were lead like lambs to the slaughter are also Paulbots, since, in fact, their manipulation at the conventions did absolutely nothing to further the aims of THEIR candidate, instead, aiding and abetting the idiocy of Paul.